Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 6

No.4330475 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Why is no one else currently building a digital rangefinder camera?
I mean, I get that the whole "insignificant niche" argument worked 10 years ago. But since cameras as a whole have become an insignificant niche, why not give people what they want? Because I'm pretty sure many people want a Leica but can't afford it. Just look at how popular the meme camera X100 has become - isn't it time for someone to capitalize on that?
53 posts and 7 images omitted

past few months of memes

No.4331375 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Going to post 12 or so rolls worth of snaps from the past few months. Assortment of Foma 100, Kodak XX, and Ilford FP4. All pushed 2-3 stops because crushed shadows are great.
106 posts and 65 images omitted

No.4331899 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Holy shit.
Rollei is releasing a new film camera. Film is so back and I’m going to buy one.
Rollei35af

You are buying one too right /p?

Manual controls too so it’s not just a point and shoot. I am hyped.
47 posts and 6 images omitted

No.4331994 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Post shit of the same thing in different seasons. Or don't.
20 posts and 9 images omitted

MFT thread

No.4335736 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Foolframe in shambles edition.
We are at a point where MFT has equal or better DR with equivalent lenses and ISO, IN PHOTOS than top of the line FF bodies.
1-2 stops of IBIS advantage only increase the gap.
314 posts and 76 images omitted

No.4317486 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
190 posts and 83 images omitted

/sqt/ - Stupid Question Thread

No.4326474 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
"Dust, in MY lens?" Edition. Sending this one to Canon for cleaning. It's hardly been used and is filled with dust all over. This is lust the top left quarter.
When taking portraits, face or full body, what apertures would you use for a 50mm or 80mm equivalent to get your subject in focus (more than just eyes) but keep the image a little soft elsewhere?
Any rational for tightening the aperture versus keeping it wide open?

Bump limit reached for last thread.
Previous Thread: >>4319497
354 posts and 63 images omitted

No.4336405 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
I spent years buying digital camera gear and shooting digital only to realize that film actually does look better. Well time to start all over again.

Whats a good film camera thats manual, and around the 80s-90s era? I also want something non mirrorless/dslr feeling as I just feel sick with regret any time I touch something like that now.
35 posts and 6 images omitted

phone /p/hotography

No.4289542 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Old >>4260419
197 posts and 127 images omitted