Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 8

On these archives
Your latest searches
Capcode
Show Posts
Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts
Post Type
Results
Order
Anonymous
2MiB, 1258x806, Colorgrading.png
View SameGoogleImgOpsiqdbSauceNAO

Editing skills > photography skills

Anonymous No.4298607 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>4306020
So if I understand correctly, it's not the camera gear or composition of the photograph that makes a good photo nowadays. It doesn't even matter how bad your snap shits are. Not even the quality of SOOC needs to be of value. The entire image is dependant on your photo editing skills entirely, better yet color grading skills.

>Just like this dude, you can take any shitty picture and turn them in to master pieces.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpwMlDtqbK4

>Here her portraits are amazing but are only really elevated one she applies color grading.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mC8ol2-V7Ck
16 posts and 2 images omitted
Anonymous
51KiB, 640x503, IMG_8929.jpg
View SameGoogleImgOpsiqdbSauceNAO

Anonymous No.4305971 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>4305981 >>4306167 >>4306183
You now remember that time when Olympus went full retard and made a non-detachable lens DSLR.
Anonymous
301KiB, 1849x1655, 1713436774136.png
View SameGoogleImgOpsiqdbSauceNAO

DXOMARK is dead

Anonymous No.4305428 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>4306179
>DXOMARK
>the latest medium format camera they bothered reviewing is from 2016
>Only 2 fullframe camera reviews in 2023 and nothing after that
Are these fuckers dropping everything to only review phones now?
What other website has a better review and measured stats database? For things like measures dynamic range of sensors for example
43 posts and 3 images omitted
Anonymous
3MiB, 4000x3000, 20240328_160125.jpg
View SameGoogleImgOpsiqdbSauceNAO

/gear/ Thread - Compact Edition

Anonymous No.4299018 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Quoted By:
Just received this. Going to give it 2 weeks and then probably sell my XT4 and lenses if I love it.
310 posts and 42 images omitted
Sarabande
4MiB, 7672x5115, DSCF1.jpg
View SameGoogleImgOpsiqdbSauceNAO

Fotos

Sarabande No.4296914 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By:
49 posts and 22 images omitted
Anonymous
360KiB, 1600x1257, s-l1600.jpg
View SameGoogleImgOpsiqdbSauceNAO

Sports Photography

Anonymous No.4305199 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>4306011
I feel like I am looking at a Renaissance painting when I look at this photo.
8 posts and 4 images omitted
cinefag !CiNE/YT/e6
784KiB, 2168x1734, 1488574368482.jpg
View SameGoogleImgOpsiqdbSauceNAO

cinefag !CiNE/YT/e6 No.4305874 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By:
There's a gearhead game that consists of naming a car brand and two words that describe it, with a conjuntion in the middle.
Some examples:

Alfa Romeo -> Soul and passion
Audi -> VW with leather
Ferrari -> Class and style
BMW -> Plagiarized a Kia
Skoda -> VW but reliable
Lamborghini -> Rebadged an Audi
Volkswagen -> Dishonest yet successful

Why not do the photography equivalent of it?
I'm going to post the first:

>Garry Winogrand -> Hack with connections
11 posts and 3 images omitted
Anonymous
57KiB, 590x415, GRIII_HDF_Angle.jpg
View SameGoogleImgOpsiqdbSauceNAO

Anonymous No.4298840 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>4303471
After pranking us twice, Ricoh finally just released the all new Ricoh GRIII HDF and GRIIIx HDF. What do you think about it? Is it the X100VI killer? Does it mean we have to wait another 5 years for a Ricoh GR IV?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQk3yb83h8E
32 posts and 1 image omitted
Anonymous
294KiB, 1200x1200, thomas-lang-contact-sheet-5_gestalt.jpg
View SameGoogleImgOpsiqdbSauceNAO

Film General Thread /fgt/

Anonymous No.4302680 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Quoted By:
The We'll actually post photos edition

Previous thread >>4300690

/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit
>negative film ages better than positive
>black and white better than color
>slow films better than fast
>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years
>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited
>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.
>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 process


Useful links
>[massive dev chart] gives times for home film development
https://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php
>[film dev] shows results of development regimes
https://filmdev.org/
>[news & community links]
35mmc.com
casualphotophile.com
kosmofoto.com
emulsive.org
japancamerahunter.com
334 posts and 124 images omitted
Anonymous
785KiB, 1500x1012, img (1).jpg
View SameGoogleImgOpsiqdbSauceNAO

some photos

Anonymous No.4301745 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By:
I hope just posting some photos like this is not against the rules because I don't see other threads like this but I also think it's too many pictures to post into the general threads.

I haven't taken photos in a while so I am going by instict and I would not be surprised if these are all pointless but I would still appreciate feedback even if it's all negative to know what kind of direction I should go.
17 posts and 15 images omitted
×