I'm think about grabbing one of these for recording family videos. Anyone have any experience using the osmo pocket 3? What are your thoughts on the device?
Threads by latest replies - Page 151
Quoted By:
I am very seriously considering buying a Sigma fp for photography. Sigma is the only company making digital cameras with soul.
Quoted By:
Anyone experienced with product photography? I have an empty room available in my house and thought of building a setup for that. Building a small side business. Given I know how to compose and take photos as well as having all the necessary gear.. why not? Is this market easier to make some €€€ compared to the standard wedding/portrait photography? Of course need to build a strong portfolio first, website, etc.
Quoted By: >>4412852
What are nice poses for men?
Quoted By:
Why would you spend 3k on camera and lenses if you don't even have a life worth documenting anon?
>Primary: 50MP 1.0″ sensor, 3.2 µm (4-in-1) pixels,23mm equivalent f/1.63 aperture lens, OIS
>Tele 1: 50MP, 1.4 µm (4-in-1) pixels, 70mm equivalent f/1.8-aperture lens, OIS
>Tele 2: 200MP, 2.24 µm pixels, 100mm equivalent f/2.6-aperture lens (periscope design), OIS
>Ultra-wide: 50MP, 1.28 µm (4-in-1) pixels, 14mm f/2.2-aperture lens
Can this thing unironically replace a mirrorless camera kit?
>Tele 1: 50MP, 1.4 µm (4-in-1) pixels, 70mm equivalent f/1.8-aperture lens, OIS
>Tele 2: 200MP, 2.24 µm pixels, 100mm equivalent f/2.6-aperture lens (periscope design), OIS
>Ultra-wide: 50MP, 1.28 µm (4-in-1) pixels, 14mm f/2.2-aperture lens
Can this thing unironically replace a mirrorless camera kit?
Quoted By: >>4412846
Do people really buy these for $1600? You can get a $20 film 35mm p&s for $20.
>bigger "sensor" at full frame
>similar quality lens
>images will actually look like film instead of m43 photos with an s-curve
>saves you $1580
>similar size
Just admit this is a fashion accessory, not a real camera. Same goes for the Richo retards. If you were serious about having a compact, high quality camera you would just being buying a 90s film point and shoot.
>bigger "sensor" at full frame
>similar quality lens
>images will actually look like film instead of m43 photos with an s-curve
>saves you $1580
>similar size
Just admit this is a fashion accessory, not a real camera. Same goes for the Richo retards. If you were serious about having a compact, high quality camera you would just being buying a 90s film point and shoot.
Really impressed with the results.
Quoted By: >>4412629
Quoted By:
Anybody know what camera this is or used tiny cameras in general?
