Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
Threads by latest replies - Page 161
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Why do we even need big, clunky, interchangeable lens cameras when phone cameras already produce images as good as this??
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4404208 Yes. The truth is very cool.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4404208 You better think its cool. You have a canon rebel and dogshit lenses. Not exactly a vintage CCD digishit. Not exactly a nice modern camera. All you can shoot pleasantly is B&W street photography and low ISO deep focus stuff, stopped down to milk as much decency out of crappy lenses that are neither sharp nor characterful - just blurry.
You also need to remember that megapixels are not resolution. They are the digital sampling rate, but not actually how much detail is resolved. You have to account for demosaicing blur, the AA filter, and lens blur. So the actual resolution of your camera could be half the output size. Near full sized images would only good for 300dpi prints, for the internet you should be posting half size instead of displaying blur.
Anonymous
>>4404118 Nikon Chads keep on winning.
Anonymous
>>4404555 Can you help me with my mft camera settings? I would like it to look nicer than OP's pic. Please help me and my poor mft babies. Thank you.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4404141 >>4404561 >purse wearing snoyboy still seething over m43
Anonymous
Opinions on fine art landscape photography?
Anonymous
>>4406641 I would hope so! We are on the pee board. No like the camera the guy used?
Anonymous
>>4406642 Yeah, it's 40mp or something like that. I understand the photo is compressed. I don't mean it looks like an iphone photo in terms of pixel peeping. Moreso tonality and it's framed the way a phone shooter would frame it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4406645 Oh yeah 40MP could get you a nice big print. I like how the lines of trees draw your eyes out towards the mountain and clouds. It has a nice flow to it that makes it more interesting than just a shot of the mountain. Maybe that's just me.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
photos for this feel?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4406710 What's the feel being depicted I'm not sure I understand.
Do you bet on 0? What game is being played? Does betting on 0 convey an decisive advantage thus the smug chud face?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Why do people hate on direct flash photography. I think it looks pretty cool. If you hate it, then post a better portrait photography style if you even have the balls to.
Anonymous
It's not the direct flash that people generally hate on (although it is harsh and unflattering) its Terry's tendency to photograph people against a blank wall, which reduces the narrative of the image down to just the person in it. There is no context. Terry is relying on the celebrity of the subject - set in an ostensibly candid environment, and some people find that vulgar.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4406492 she is wearing a torn wife beater, no bra and the cheapest panties anyone could find. its intentionally trashy and vulgar
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4406468 it doesn't look good, but a lot of portrait styles also don't look very good
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4406468 Terry has a a strong brand identity for taking photos that look interesting in high-gloss and stand out just enough to be part of a magazine spread without overshadowing the text, plus the cache of each person photographed being added to the exalted pantheon of people who have been found worthy by the powers that be to have a Terry portrait taken and publicisized.
You don't have that, so you aren't Terry. Shut up, quit being lazy, and learn standard lighting.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4406468 Not a fan of the Sony-style computer-measured baby-mount vignetting
Anonymous
The great debate>muh primes [spoiler:lit]I actually only own primes, but IMO unless you are doing something where you need a focal length you can't get in a pro level zoom, like 400mm or 600mm pro level zooms > consumer level primes >garbage > consumer level zooms > why are you using a "pro level" prime you weird retard?[/spoiler:lit]
Anonymous
>>4404221 >The great debate Not really. It's an interchangeable lens camera. You don't have to glue the lens on. You can shoot primes and zooms. A better debate is why do Americans feel the need to turn every product into a retarded false dichotomy? Is it because their education system is dogshit, because the CIA puts shit in their water, or because they all have nigger DNA? Surprisingly the answer is a combination of all three.
Anonymous
>>4404869 blame massachusetts
Our entire culture is founded on some massholes deciding to hate tea and start drinking coffee in protest of a tax
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Americans be like: >The San Francisco Snoy Party >Under command of Trump, Americans raided a ship and threw its entire shipment of digital cameras into the ocean. Shortly after, Trump signed an executive order declaring Kodak film the official photographic medium of the US Government.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4404869 why do third worlders who haven't invented the toilet seethe so hard at the US, aka the place that owns the moon and is smarter than the rest of the world combined?
>>4404882 taxes are gay
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4404331 >85mm >minimal weight I dunno about the cheap prime, but the pro rf85 is a fucking kilo, its a brick. When I put 28 pancake on my body its a fucking breath of relief after using pro glass.
Anonymous
Anyone here stick a 105mm f/2.4 pentax 67 lens on a pentax 645 body and was it worth it?
Anonymous
>>4401284 >Triggered by the truth There is no rational reason to shoot film
>its LE ARTISTIC AND UNREAL! learn to constrain the color palette and dynamic range of a photo and add a grain sim instead of paying kodak to do it for you
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4401348 >add grain sim look at what the digicucks need to do to mimic our power
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4401348 you will never understand
just let it go
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4400910 i want a blue camera...
Anonymous
Quoted By:
So I get sticking your camera right up in someone's face looks weird because too close so generally people want 85mm-200mm for head shots. but beyond that, if you are taking nonhead shot portraits, what do the focal lengths do? is it just a matter of you choose closer to 35-50mm if you want the background around the subject and you chose like 105-135mm to use the compression to isolate the subject from the context of the background and the only other big consideration would be how much physical room you have to shoot? IE if you are shooting at a park and have room and want the background to fuck off, the compression of 135 mm or 200 mm will do that the best, where as in a studio with a controlled background you might pick 50mm or 85mm because lol no space to get the 2/3rds or what ever % of the body in shot you want? Let's say I want to do cowboy (mid thigh up) framing, 40mm, 50mm, 90mm and 150mm would all work fine and it would just be a matter of how much physical space I have and how much I want to show the background vs use compression to isolate the subject from the background?
Anonymous
>>4401697 I don't even know why someone would care about edge sharpness wide open anyway. If you want a sharp background you need to shoot at f/8+ anyway
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4401758 One situation I can think of is astro. But other than that I can't come up with a situation where you'd be shooting something flat and also in low light. I suppose there are landscapes where you'd be focussing far enough away that you could get a deep enough depth of field for it all to be in focus at f/2.8, but you're going to be using a tripod anyway especially if you know it's going to be low light.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4401703 >Maybe life is different for crop sensor and a7rv people, with their tiny pixels? I don't own any zooms, but I'll blame it on format. For M43 the 20mm pancake means I can fit the camera in my coat pocket and I don't think there is a zoom that is as fast as the 75mm 1.8 or at least not that fast with that price. Plus I have the 60mm macro but that's a different thing. idk how good old zooms are/their cost for the pentax 645 I have so I just have the 75mm 2.8 kit lens and the 150mm 3.5, that's like a 45mm and a 90mm and I have a 50mm ef, but that's just because I had the lens lying around from when I used to shoot apsc and its the only lens I had that was EF mount and not EF-S so I figured I might as well drop $50 for a film body since its not much and I have the lens and a bunch of 35mm film my brother gave me anyway
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4401553 >The size of objects behind your subject are changed with FL The relative size is changed by your perspective, not FL, which just gives you a particular framing for a given perspective.
Zoom or not, if you want to change the relative size of the background, you do need to move with your feet.
>>4401544 Just depends on the type of portrait you want to take. I like 50 for most vertical portraits, 35 for horizontal, and 85-135 for more narrow / headshot.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Why 85mm, 105mm and 135mm>muh compression I get that, but why those 3 specific numbers. why not like 90mm? or 100mm?
Anonymous
>>4401759 I'm saying why are those 3 arbitrary numbers the most common
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4401759 >anon can't into context Yes, you are retarded.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4401763 They are apparently sweet spots for maximizing performance with regards to historic lens manufacturing constraints and designs.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Have you noticed this weird sentiment being spread lately about how if you take photos, then that means you aren't enjoying life, usually termed as "living in the moment"? It's so strange, what causes this and how do you deal with it? I love photography because I feel it connects me deeper to things, but it seems that's not the common opinion
cANON !!5Dz+C7v45HK
Quoted By:
>>4405695 ngl that's a based shitpost
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4405703 You’ll get out of highschool someday champ. Until then you’ll have an insufferable personality based on the assumption that you’re always right.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4405703 That dudes not coming apart, he’s ripping you apart. You never even answered his question. Why are you defensive? Did the mean handsome normie man in your head tell you "look up from the screen you fuckin sperg" and start banging your waifu? Is that why you made this thread? Lol
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4405703 do "gnostic"fags really lmfao
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4405533 It's true.
Looking at things with your own eyes is more emotionally sincere then any form of secondary looking like photography.
Anonymous
Lookin for LowRes Cameras that mimic the look & feel of a Public Access Show from the late90s-early00s, one w/ HDMI so I can plug them into a Multicam Switcher for a Podcast type setup. Any good recommendations? This seems like the right board to ask, if not sorry. (Pic Unrelated)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
just something that looks kind of shitty
Anonymous
Quoted By:
How about just some cameras I can get for cheap considering I'm gonna need around 4 of them
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4406360 >for a Podcast type setup please have mercy, please don't do it
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4406360 just buy an old camcorder with an analog output and convert it to hdmi
Anonymous
Quoted By:
get a panasonic camcorder and some good mics man maybe a powershot or some rx stuff not to say this rudely nobody will give you anything beyond the vlog bro's version of our "moody cool fx bro" and they won't watch it you are competing with studio grade with literally every podcast bro sadly but you should focus this intent on the content YOU COVER WRITE AND PROVIDE, as clear as possible with some mellow post for segments, maybe a scenes type thing just please always show friends this stuff privately don't be one of the zillion dudes with no need for green screen take your time and make your show great and bring that Kitsch and content and... maybe shots from thoise cameras. want to see you succeed and have fun anon a bunch of social media comments saying nicefx from people that don't really watch aren't going to be that way at all, in fact opposite especially if you ask about an episode and just get yapped