/p/ - Photography » Page 171

3MiB, 4000x3000, 20250126_195903.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2025 14:09:33 No.4402030 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

Why is film so expensive?
How am I supposed to be trigger happy about it?

76KiB, 894x629, g5x.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Zoomer digicam logic.

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2025 07:35:04 No.4402006 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4402009

Pic related is not cool.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO canon-powershot-g7x-markiii-AP1c.jpg, 150KiB, 1024x683

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2025 07:43:41 No.4402007 Report

Quoted By: >>4402008 >>4402009

This however where the only added bonus is a few more fps which they will never use and crappy 4k video is in their opinion worth twice as much.
So essentially they lose out on an electronic viewfinder, flippy-screen instead of tiltable only, hotshoe and extra dials for better manual control.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2025 08:06:00 No.4402008 Report

Quoted By: >>4402009

>>4402007
yes, women and retards value form over function, are you new or something?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2025 08:14:12 No.4402009 Report

Quoted By: >>4402010

>>4402006
>>4402007
>>4402008
It's a COMPACT camera you shartlords.
Form *is* function.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2025 08:19:01 No.4402010 Report

Quoted By: >>4402024

>>4402009
You're not really valuing it's form as a function if the form doesn't actually have an effect on any real world scenario. Either fit in a bag, either fit in your pocket. There's not really any scenario where you could carry one of these and not the other.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2025 13:19:57 No.4402024 Report

Quoted By:

>>4402010
The G7 is actually a fair bit smaller, the lack of viewfinder hump and that little bit off the thickness makes it just that much easier to slip into a pocket (especially trousers). If you've got a bag then you can likely fit in it something even bigger and better than the G5. You're not really giving up that much, you're not going to be carry a flash around with you as well, you only need a single dial if you're shooting in Av most of the time, I'm assuming the screen tilts all the way up for selfies.

3MiB, 2000x1356, DSC06879-1.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

/rpt/ - Recent Photo Thread:

Anonymous Thu 19 Dec 2024 21:47:32 No.4393321 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By: >>4398537

dead board edition

Last: >>4389147

240 posts and 150 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2025 11:38:34 No.4398584 Report

Quoted By: >>4399628

>>4398535
BurtGummer is one of the best oldfag photographers on /p/

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Jan 2025 16:46:31 No.4399628 Report

Quoted By:

>>4398584
t. definitely not GurtBummer w/ trip off

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Jan 2025 17:36:52 No.4399635 Report

Quoted By:

>>4398347
>F3.2
What
Is it a focus stack?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2025 05:36:36 No.4401999 Report

Quoted By:

>>4393323
this shit fire flames

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2025 05:53:10 No.4402001 Report

Quoted By:

>>4393388
should have been colour you

3MiB, 2715x3394, DMC_2590.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

/rpt/ - Recent Photo Thread:

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2025 04:25:53 No.4398537 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

autism edition
Last: >>4393321

311 posts and 153 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Jan 2025 07:24:51 No.4401055 Report

Quoted By: >>4401065

>>4401054
yeah, dont do this. 4chan lies about storing your email. they do, in fact, store it and use it to track bans. i tested it with autoban text and a router unplug. do not use your email to post here. just wait 5 minutes and whitelist the cookies.

>>4400647
posts with more than i think 5 backlinks are blocked

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Jan 2025 08:20:21 No.4401065 Report

Quoted By: >>4401067

>>4401055
i dont really post outside of /p/ anyway, im not really gonna get banned for things i say here lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Jan 2025 08:38:45 No.4401067 Report

Quoted By: >>4401074

>>4401065
>creating a permanent tie between your identity and 4chan posts
do not

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Jan 2025 09:25:59 No.4401074 Report

Quoted By: >>4401977

>>4401067
schizo much?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2025 00:31:13 No.4401977 Report

Quoted By:

>>4401074
You're as naive as the pattern on a '60s housewife's skirt

1MiB, 976x650, migrant whipping.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Thu 23 Jan 2025 11:01:11 No.4401288 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

What will be the most iconic political photographs of the joe biden presidency?

8 posts and 4 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2025 21:36:06 No.4401649 Report

Quoted By:

>>4401292
not bad, I thought Americans gave up protecting their country

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2025 21:39:08 No.4401650 Report

Quoted By:

>>4401551
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGPSeHvILRo

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 26 Jan 2025 13:49:36 No.4401768 Report

Quoted By:

>>4401292
>t-they're being whipped!
Even with institutional power, lies still have to be somewhat believable.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO biden-trump-guilty-verdict-e1717 (...).jpg, 127KiB, 1000x1000

Anonymous Sun 26 Jan 2025 15:01:59 No.4401773 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO GPdmOgQXAAAE5EN.jpg, 181KiB, 1071x714

Anonymous Mon 27 Jan 2025 12:22:47 No.4401892 Report

Quoted By:

Anything from global geopolitics works

12KiB, 225x225, comet.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 27 May 2024 07:08:43 No.4317828 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

I have been studying alot of ancient history, specifically ancient astronomy.
I am now certain that all world events can be predicted from studying the skies.
Anybody here using telescopes to photograph comets? I am looking for roughly what I need, and examples of what you guys are getting with your gear?
I really need to be able to see and photograph comets and meteors in space.

309 posts and 111 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Jan 2025 03:23:25 No.4399938 Report

Quoted By:

>>4399889
That edited result looks rather good. Any particular steps you've made? I try and go for similar looks but I always end up making the sky look retardedly noisy or dark

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Jan 2025 03:45:53 No.4399942 Report

Quoted By:

>>4399889
If you're looking for a backdrop image with trees, the trick is to do a short exposure to capture the trees, then a long exposure to capture the sky. Doesn't look like you're using a tracker, so a single second exposure of the trees at a medium-to-high iso for the background, and a low exposure around 100-200 to capture the background, and overlay the images.10 seconds untracked will give you star tracking like that. I would do 5 seconds and multiple exposures and stack them, then recombine the background the still backdrop and recombine.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1729383581475149.jpg, 4MiB, 6048x4032

Anonymous Sun 26 Jan 2025 12:01:09 No.4401755 Report

Quoted By: >>4401764 >>4401821

I fucking hate starlink

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 26 Jan 2025 13:18:50 No.4401764 Report

Quoted By: >>4401821

>>4401755
It's kinda fun seeing all the satelites that would otherwise be lumped in as another star.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 27 Jan 2025 00:09:54 No.4401821 Report

Quoted By:

>>4401755
>>4401764
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1o1PNCjtwE

757KiB, 1440x1084, for-anyone-scared-of-a-little-rain-v0-4ci5rjgwxq8c1.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 04 Jan 2025 12:47:36 No.4396882 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By: >>4400244

Which brand has the most reliable weather sealing? I wanna shoot /out/ but I live in michigan.

Has anyone had their 'weather sealed' camera die on them from heavy rain?

167 posts and 18 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2025 19:18:12 No.4400244 Report

Quoted By:

>>4396882
It's all on price tiers unless you're pentax

Sony's SLR style bodies post-2019 have thorough weather sealing than sony's rangefinder style bodies and GM and G lenses have sealing while non letter lenses do not have the same degree of protection.
Nikon's professional full frame bodies have weather sealing but the most thorough weather sealing is reserved for the Z8 and Z9. Nikon's S line lenses have weather sealing but others do not.
Canon's professional full frame bodies have weather sealing with the best reserved for the R1 and R3. From the R8 down it gets worse. Canon lenses not branded with "L" do not have weather sealing at all.
Olympus bodies market weather sealing heavily but the OM-1/EM-1 series is the only one with actual full fledged sealing. It's downgraded for the OM-5/EM-5 series and absent lower. Only ZUIKO PRO lenses are weather sealed.
ALL modern pentax cameras and their lenses are fully weather sealed! Old lenses from the film days are not.
Panasonic varies by lens, no easy branding to follow.
Just don't get a fujifilm wet unless you're a gambling man.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 19 Jan 2025 21:24:28 No.4400456 Report

Quoted By: >>4400460

>>4400152
Ignore the Sony schizos that get easily triggered over anyone pointing out their gear isn't anything but perfect. She literally promotes Sony products in her other videos. Snoyboys just dont want to admit their color science is horrible.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 19 Jan 2025 21:34:13 No.4400460 Report

Quoted By:

>>4400456
She promotes whichever brand gives her free gear

Sony color science is great. I don't see anyone else having this green issue except on the old a7iii with its inaccurate AWB, not even her, all her other sony colors are really good even with the a7iii which is hard to grade properly, so I'm assuming she cowtowed to panasonics demands for one small, little-watched review where the top comments are all ESLs. Definitely some shilling going on there but it was probably worth the free s9 to her.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 26 Jan 2025 15:48:15 No.4401776 Report

Quoted By:

>>4400041
>optically inferior

Proof?

sinu !!ery8Lh1+tE6

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot 2025-01-26 103729.png, 1MiB, 951x898

sinu !!ery8Lh1+tE6 Sun 26 Jan 2025 18:59:01 No.4401803 Report

Quoted By:

First wedding of the year ended up being the rainiest I've ever shot. Was calm, then downpour started as soon as things got started, and everyone got absolutely drenched.
Didn't think to take a wet gear pic, but here's a crop for the anecdote. Zf and X-H2s held out just fine while getting equally drenched.
The real MVP of the day was my dry bag backpack though, kept all my other gear safe and sound to and from the venue. Most everyone else's bags/backpacks got soaked through just being outside, and even had 1 phone rip. Thankful I stuck with black clothes too.

4MiB, 4032x3024, 20220204_123224.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 26 Jan 2025 15:15:50 No.4401774 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

pic unrelated, if I am having issues with light leaks on a medium format camera, but only some rolls, its likely me fucking up when loading it, right?

313KiB, 732x738, lights.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

So I dove into the printing hole..

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2025 06:10:52 No.4401569 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4401680 >>4401692

and it is no small task figuring out how things end up looking compared to what you are seeing on the monitor and how different paper types affect the print etc, but one can always do a test on a smaller paper before doing the larger prints so that isn't really the worst part about it all. The worst part is presentation and lighting after the fact.
Are there any type of lamps i should look into?

7 posts and 1 image omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO cartard.jpg, 11KiB, 213x202

Anonymous Sun 26 Jan 2025 00:48:05 No.4401680 Report

Quoted By: >>4401687 >>4401766

>>4401569
>I've worked at a print shop which offered c-type, dye sub and pigment inkjet prints, and I can assure you that everyone who brings their printing to a lab is a fucking idiot
Ah yes, the ol' "everyone is a retard except me"

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 26 Jan 2025 01:06:16 No.4401685 Report

Quoted By:

>>4401679
In inkjet, a pigment printer is visibly superior for density/saturation on matte paper. Most B&W prints will also look better from a pigment inkset, regardless of paper, because they have a more neutral tone.
Pigment prints are more UV stable too, but less durable if they'll be handled.
On gloss or lustre though, dye-based printers look just as good or better. Glossy paper has far superior dynamic range as well, and dye based prints can be handled a little bit without much harm. A dye print framed behind glass and out of direct sun will still last for years, but you should keep a duplicate print of anything really important stored in a folio.
Dye printers are MUCH less prone to clogging. This is very important for a home printer which (be honest) will be used infrequently. You may as well yeet your Pixma Pro 1100 into the trash if you don't print anything for 6 months and the head clogs. Ask me how I know.
Sharpness-wise, any of the modern multi-ink Canon or Epsons deliver the same results, and there's not really any consumer technology that beats them. I have a Canon Pro 100S, which is 12-year old technology now; it's essentially equal to the very best and newest 14-pigment Canon models for sharpness.
Commercial-tier machines aren't sharper, they're literally the same tech scaled up for roll paper and bigger ink tanks. What that does mean though is that they will give the same "check details with a loupe" resolution over a 6-foot wide print if your file has the meat in it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 26 Jan 2025 01:24:58 No.4401687 Report

Quoted By:

>>4401680
Civilians can barely wrap their head around the difference between a transmissive and reflective medium, let alone gamuts, light sources, profiles and calibrations for everything.
A person doesn't need to be actually retarded to be functionally retarded in a technical setting.
Mr "I sent my files to 5 different labs and have ranked their results" obviously thinks he's very clever with his calibrated display but doesn't even know how much he doesn't know yet.
If he had a clue, getting a perfect result would be as simple as asking what machine/paper they were using, if it was calibrated regularly and if they're able to print without corrections, and sending them the appropriately prepared file.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 26 Jan 2025 02:28:52 No.4401692 Report

Quoted By:

>>4401569
Dove into you mums printing hole you cheeky monkey sod you

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 26 Jan 2025 13:29:16 No.4401766 Report

Quoted By:

>>4401680
>quotes wrong post

2MiB, 1500x1000, Flores (1 of 1) (2018-04-03T04_53_25.400).jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Thu 23 Jan 2025 18:34:08 No.4401347 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4401410 >>4401433 >>4401663

I haven't taken photos in a while. thinking of just using oneish focal length for a while and putting my other lenses on the shelf. have any of you guys done that and how do you find shit to take photos of?

2 posts and 1 image omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 24 Jan 2025 03:53:51 No.4401410 Report

Quoted By:

>>4401347
Gear won't help you

Days off and new places will. Who the fuck wants 500 photos of the rocks and leaves in one spot, 500 photos of the same cat, etc...

>>4401381
Yeah, they're not photographers, they're sportsmen. It's about the hunt, the challenge. It's about passing up shots and looking for ones that work with the one prime you're limited to for the duration of the game instead of taking lots of good photos whenever they show up. It's about the practice. You are less of a street photographer if your camera has autofocus, less of a street photographer if it has TTL viewfinding, less of a street photographer if the lens is too long and getting in faces isn't necessary, etc.

A lot of them are actually studio photographers, and it's a sport. It's practice so they can get better at working faster.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 24 Jan 2025 04:13:24 No.4401412 Report

Quoted By: >>4401683

>>4401381
picture is hilarious for reasons i cant describe

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 24 Jan 2025 10:52:35 No.4401433 Report

Quoted By:

>>4401347
It's what I do sometimes. Less gear to take around, you have to think about composition more etc so it's pretty good for that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2025 22:48:01 No.4401663 Report

Quoted By:

>>4401347
Yes. I mostly just use my 105mm prime macro lens. It can do macro shots, of course, but works well even for wildlife. Only sucks for group photos and landscapes.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO goy.png, 44KiB, 343x400

Anonymous Sun 26 Jan 2025 00:59:15 No.4401683 Report

Quoted By:

>>4401412
>NOSE: AMPLIFY
>EAR: ENLARGE
>GOY: MAXIMUUUUM

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Threads by latest replies - Page 171

On these archives

Your latest searches

Zoomer digicam logic.

/rpt/ - Recent Photo Thread:

/rpt/ - Recent Photo Thread:

So I dove into the printing hole..