Quoted By: >>4404501
I have collected bunch of shitty cameras.
>Canon SX160 IS (1/2.3" 28-448 mm eq F3.5 - F5.9. Slowest aperture F8.0 no ND)
>Nikon S32 (1/3.1" 30-90mm eq. f/3.3 - F5.9 aperture options: F6.6 and ND)
>Sony HX100V (1/2.3" 27-810mm eq. F2.8 - F5.6 Slowest F8.0 + ND)
>Fujifilm S4200 (1/2.3" 24-576 mm eq. F3.1 - F5. 2 aperture options F5.9, F8 and F20 (ND) )
>Phone (cheapo $200 1/3.1" 28mm F3.1)
And I've been testing things out.
If subject is far away (say from infinity to aprox 15-20 cm away from the lens), best camera is probably sony, followed by canon, then nikon and phone then fuji.
BUT! When shit is really close, say 3-4 cm away from the lens, all of a sudden fuji performs the best. Followed by sony, canon, nikon, phone.
Why? Makes no fucking sense.
Sony is sharp with chromatic aberration controlled very well.
Canon is shap-ish with chromatic aberration not controlled at all, not it seems to be corrected by the camera. (no aspherics from what I understand, which probably leads to chromatic aberation)
Phone is sharp-ish with chromatic aberration probably corrected by software and in lens too (phone lesnes are usually fully aspheric with like 10 elements inside)
Nikon is sharp-ish and from what I can see chromatic aberration is either controller really well, or just corrected really well in the software.
Fujifilm is a blurry piece of shit, with chromatic aberration being blured by overall shittiness of lens... Except when object is really close. Did they make a microscope by accident?
>Canon SX160 IS (1/2.3" 28-448 mm eq F3.5 - F5.9. Slowest aperture F8.0 no ND)
>Nikon S32 (1/3.1" 30-90mm eq. f/3.3 - F5.9 aperture options: F6.6 and ND)
>Sony HX100V (1/2.3" 27-810mm eq. F2.8 - F5.6 Slowest F8.0 + ND)
>Fujifilm S4200 (1/2.3" 24-576 mm eq. F3.1 - F5. 2 aperture options F5.9, F8 and F20 (ND) )
>Phone (cheapo $200 1/3.1" 28mm F3.1)
And I've been testing things out.
If subject is far away (say from infinity to aprox 15-20 cm away from the lens), best camera is probably sony, followed by canon, then nikon and phone then fuji.
BUT! When shit is really close, say 3-4 cm away from the lens, all of a sudden fuji performs the best. Followed by sony, canon, nikon, phone.
Why? Makes no fucking sense.
Sony is sharp with chromatic aberration controlled very well.
Canon is shap-ish with chromatic aberration not controlled at all, not it seems to be corrected by the camera. (no aspherics from what I understand, which probably leads to chromatic aberation)
Phone is sharp-ish with chromatic aberration probably corrected by software and in lens too (phone lesnes are usually fully aspheric with like 10 elements inside)
Nikon is sharp-ish and from what I can see chromatic aberration is either controller really well, or just corrected really well in the software.
Fujifilm is a blurry piece of shit, with chromatic aberration being blured by overall shittiness of lens... Except when object is really close. Did they make a microscope by accident?