So my husband stole my camera and decided to go to the Canadian North Pole with an airplane he flies and took a selfie with a stupid animal. What is wrong with him? I need my camera for a project, is he a narcissist?

Has anybody paid to outsource their retouching?
I am considering it.
I have like 100 good photos from a portrait session and cannot be fucked retouching all that.
places like fiverr or model mayhem have lots of people offering retouching services.
How much should I be paying approx for 100 photos for just a quick skin retouch, not the full freq seperation magazine level, just good enough for the average person to be happy.

sup /p/.
I am looking for a full-frame digital platform for adapted glass. But before you start shilling for Sony, let me note a few important catches.
>My EF glass: 24-105/4L, Voigtlander 40/2, Sigma 50/1.4 A, Sigma 70/2.8 A Macro
>My F glass: 35/1.4 Ai-S, 85/2 Ai-S, Voigtlander 58/1.4, and looking to add a 28mm prime here
>I use the macro with my 5DmkIV (current workhorse) to digitize the film I shoot with the F glass
>I am satisfied with these lenses and feel no particular need to upgrade or sell them right now, but would likely look into some native mirrorless offerings in the future depending on the platform I choose
The current top pick seems to be a Canon R6mkII (or mkIII, I can wait). This is because EF glass is reputed to work extremely well with the OEM adapter. 2/3 of my F lenses don't have electrical contacts anyway so I wouldn't urgently need Canon to open their mount to guys like Fringer to make electronic F to RF adapters. Additionally, any of the above lenses will resolve just fine at 24MP. Finally the Voigtlander 40/2 adapted to the R6mkII makes for a very compact setup despite the tube (the stack should be a little under 2 inches long). The downside on the Canon is that nobody makes lenses for full-frame RF besides Voigtlander.
The other competing options appear to be the Nikon Zf and Sony A7iv.
The Nikon sounds like it has the best manual focusing experience (but as long as the R6mkII has focus peaking, punch-in zoom via function button, and automatic exposure with manual aperture lenses, then that's good enough for me), and has the benefit of both EF and F adapters having electronic options on the market (Fringer, FTZ). On the other hand it has lower battery life than both the Canon and the Sony (this is important).
The Sony undeniably has an excellent selection of new lenses from manufacturers the world over. But at the moment I am more concerned with getting the most out of what I already own.
Thoughts bros?

I don't know these people, but they threw fireworks at us and violated our personal space.
I just wanted to share this and I'm waiting for your versions of this trio

It's my birthday today, so give me your best

What are the best photography books? Stuff like araki sentimental journey and winter journey. Todd Hido house hunting. Stephen shore uncomm places and pic related.

even normies are waking up to how bad m43 is now, dont let these hack fucks shoot your wedding day with the professional equivalent of a smartphone camera

can we collectively create a discord to shit post, troll, and shit up /p/ nonstop?

Incels were right. Looks are everything. Look at Peter McKinnon, MFer has almost 6mil subs on YouTube and his photography is ass. He literally puts HDR filter on his photos, is a gaint gearfag and his subject are dudebro tier. Yet he is famous.

He looks handsome because he has nice skull, head full of hair, wears fashionable clothing tattoos, rides bikes and wears cool jewelry. Him being pretty is the main reason for his fame NOT his photography. This is a brutal blackpill hard to swallow.