Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 26

Printing thread

No.4479582 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Any Anons printing their photos?
If so, do you prefer larger or smaller prints?
I've just started getting some small somewhat crappy prints, but so far I really enjoy having my photos physically.

iPhone Pro Max Website Macro Lens Zoom-in Shows Figure in Eye

No.4478798 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
The official IPhone 17 Pro Max website shows a macro shot. When zoomed in to the woman’s eye, it shows a figure wearing a hat. I wonder who this could be…

Drop Some RAWs and Let Others Edit

No.4478730 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Here are some DNGs for you to edit. Feel free to post your own edits or own RAWs.
https://drive.proton.me/urls/248V95HC9R#yPWF9Foxzkmg
10 posts and 5 images omitted

favorite wtf lens

No.4479033 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
This is my favorite odd lens. It's a a hundred year old Bausch & Lomb Animar C-mount lens that came on some throwaway 16mm magazine camera a seller threw in my box to get rid of. This this has a poor ape range, f2.7 to 16 only, no other controls, no focus, nothing. It is absoluly TINY, this thing is like an inch long, made entirely out of stainless steel and glass, and rotates with the smoothest feel with the finest firm little indexing clicks of any Lens I've ever felt. I keep it on a body just so I can rotate it because it feels so good, like the barrel is just floating along on teflon roller bearings and somehow the very peak of each click is a microscopic metal spring that just clicks over like a timepiece clockwork. I've got a dozen other fancy-ass collectable C lenses for my Bolex 16mm, and yet I put this on and everything looks sharp as shit and the colors are just fucking dandy. So I got a Z-mount adapter, popped it on my Z7, and now I'm shooting with this fucking goofy antique lens but I swear it outperforms all the other third party Z lenses I've got for snapshitz. Of course you're gonna crop, downsize & recalc it anyway when you develop snapshots so idgaf about the coverage, but I suppose it'd be appealing to you MFT nerrrds bc you'd get full coverage of your sensore.

and no of course you can't see the same colors it produces on Ektachrome movie film on a digital sensor so i'm not even going to pretend, but
1 post and 1 image omitted

No.4479182 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
*snap*
got yo heart, bitch

No.4473027 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Which photographer made the better plea for nature?
16 posts and 3 images omitted

Photography Workshops

No.4478978 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Have you ever paid for a workshop by a photographer? They cost like $2000 just to have them critique your photographs for a few minutes.
14 posts and 1 image omitted

No.4479041 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
is it /p/ approved
7 posts omitted

No.4478767 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Orion looks so sharp tonight. Always makes me wonder how far those stars really are.

help

No.4479069 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
im preparing my gear for a very important product shoot tomorrow and just as i was done my camera decided to fuck with me for the first time since i bought it, just because it can...

whats the problem?
>a7iv
>100 ISO, 1/100 shutter speed and f1.4...
>the room im has lights on and is lit enough even for a chinesium phone to take a properly exposed image.
>my camera? both VF and live view are darker than the general population of London
can barely make up stuff in the image, its so dark... even when i point it into the light on the ceiling, its just a feint ball of light... the image is so dark, its like someone ran down the exposure scroll bar until everything got black...

i have to go up to ISO 8k+, just to get to 0.0 exposure reading... like what the fuck is that?!
worst part is... every time i press the focus button, the image goes light and gets properly exposed for under a second until the camera focuses and then everything goes dark again...

1. first i thought its only VF and live view that show a dark image and that the shot will actually look normally exposed but nope... even when i take an image, its just as dark as it is on live view or through vf...

2. then i thought the lens died or got damaged so i changed the lens but nope, same shit...

3. after that i thought exposure comp... but exposure compensation also is not it, since i cant change it in the options while the camera is in M (manual) mode.

4. then i tried switching the camera into A (auto) mode and sure enough, the image instantly got properly exposed... i tried taking an image to inspect which settings the camera chose to get proper exposure but the values were nearly identical as what i set myself on M mode (shutter speed 1/80, ISO 125, f1.4) and yet the image was not dark, it was properly exposed, whereas when i am on these same exact ISO/shutter/aperture values, i have to go up to ISO 8600 just to get to normal 0.0 exposure reading... wtf?!!

please help... i have to wake up in 7 hours