>maximum file size allowed is 5 MB

Why is the number so small even to this day?

Why do older photos taken by top of the line cameras look more colorful and feel very different then what's taken now? is it all just lighting tricks?

I got this from a thrift store years ago for super cheap. I can't afford to buy a better one right now. Is it worth using or should I just put it in storage and wait until I can buy a new one?

Grusky mooched off Koyaanisqatsi. Fuck that hack. Fuck Dusseldorf school of Photography. I am done with this shite.

This was the view from my balcony yesterday

Post the view from your window/balcony

So this videography lens can be used in 15mm up to 35mm ? Is that right? Can the f stop go higher than 2.8?

Anybody know what exact camera gear setup this guy is using?

Looks like a sony but unsure if FX3 or FX30 or A7CR etc

Either way, the video quality & audio for youtube blew the fuck out of the video quality that the Sony DSLR vlogger team faggots were using. (A7s3 or around there)

Video quality here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSiRv7Nek0c

photos that convey movement edition

Previous thread:
>>4380134

/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit
>negative film ages better than positive
>black and white better than color
>slow films better than fast
>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years
>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited
>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.
>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 process


Useful links
>[massive dev chart] gives times for home film development
https://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php
>[film dev] shows results of development regimes
https://filmdev.org/
>[news & community links]
35mmc.com
casualphotophile.com
kosmofoto.com
emulsive.org
japancamerahunter.com

>thread question
do you have friends that like analog photography as well or do you just do your stuff by yourself?

is taking a photo really that hard? I don't get it

Hey lads, I need actual advice for a genuinely tricky shot.

I have this idea for an album cover that I'm doing which involves having a bird to perch atop the scroll ("headstock" for you guitarists) of a violin or cello. I live in Australia so we're hoping to use one our more iconic species (blue wren in pic related) which are quite tiny but plentiful.

Now the question is, is this something I can realistically do or should I just photoshop it? I live next to one of the biggest bird sanctuaries in the area, so there's no shortage of birds. I do wildlife photography all the time and understand these birds quite well, but I can't just sit here for hours every day for a month, I would need some sort of strategy.

If I do photoshop it, how do I make not look awful?