Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
Threads by latest replies - Page 32
Anonymous
Quoted By:
The worst part of photography school is paying for the fees, but the facilities and tutors are really good where I am. I might drop out after I get what I want out of it. It forced me to learn how to photograph and meter properly, use composition, understand lighting, and edit in post-production—all things that amateurs struggle with because they can’t ask a professional for tips.
Anonymous
>>4482865 What about you post pictures instead of bitching about /p/ and being a loser?
Anonymous
>>4482891 I want to have a career instead of being a hobbyfag like you
Anonymous
>>4482893 >I'm doing it for my mental health because I have paranoid schizophrenia and need art therapy. >I want to have a career instead of being a hobbyfag like you pretentious lying fag still haven't posted any pics of your catalog. Something tells me that it'll be some street shit
Anonymous
>>4482904 Here. Critique it all you want. I am trying to get better.
Wanting a career and doing it for therapy aren't mutually exclusive but I guess I have cognitive dissonance over what I want to do. I just want to get good at photography, and that is it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482908 Meh it's ok honestly, the top left is too empty, you could've shopped the cloud to put it up so you would have a symmetry of the cloud around the cross-pigeon axis. The position of the pigeon is nice you can clearly tell it's taking off from the cross and gives a sensation of leaving the frame. Of course there's the angel symbolism but that's overdone and the bird is a pigeon. For the colour grading it's not bad but the eye and feet of the bird are almost purple and orange. The grains help a lot to give this religious style, I'm sure a smooth version would not be pleasant to watch. Honestly good picture just not that interesting / deep.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Okay so in short, I'm part of a horticultural society that has a yearly photo contest. The voting for the contest recently ended a couple of days ago but the winners won't be announced for a while. I want your opinion on the entrants to the contest. I'm not going to tell you which are mine, because I don't want your bias to taint your analysis. I will tell you that 6 of the 34 pictures are mine, so feel free to guess which are mine. I do have a fairly consistent style.
Here's the images:
https://www.ahsregion4.org/photos/PhotoContest/2025/2025_R4-Cat_1-Single_and_Multiple_Blooms-no_names.pdf
Anonymous
>>4477397 Are the winners announced yet?
Anonymous
>>4477399 No, they'll be announced in the next Region 4 newsletter.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477406 When will that be?
Zach
Quoted By:
>>4477343 I like the 18th one the most.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
What is everyone's least favorite picture from those 34? I wanna see something.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
#1 post ur clouds edition
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482722 This shits me so much.
>Wow this looks like a good photo better get the camera out >BUT it isn't good enough to stop the car and spend an extra 120 seconds of my day to make it look actually decent Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482741 >IMG23058 — Pentax K-1, HD PENTAX-D FA* 70-200mm F2.8 ED DC AW @ 180.0mm f16.0 1_500s, ISO 250.jpg it's internal zoom
I almost certainly just left the rear cap off while I vacuumed or something at some point recently, first time I've seen dust there
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4464658 This picture would be golden if there was only a tree line instead of a house on the right side.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4465726 Enjoying this one.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4466687 This pic is fire
Anonymous
Quoted By:
How do you sell a photo for over a million dollars?
Anonymous
>>4482685 >>4482683 >just go be a politician The thing is people don't have to listen to your impotent crying. Muh beauty is something different to everyone until a set of shared values aka ideology lends it objective weight.
Anonymous
>>4482698 Faggot go on a hike.
Anonymous
>>4482708 You can't build anything on primordial force, if so then top predator animals would have kingdoms, and they do not
Anonymous
>>4482708 >implying "go on a hike" is an insult kek
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482727 As if kingdoms were built by fags like you and not warriors. Even if it was true what's your point ? Are you happier than cats or owls ?
>>4482839 Based retard, read between the lines you've missed the point
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Do you develop and scan your own film or send it off to someone else? AT what point doe it become worth it to develop your own rolls rather than sending it to someone else?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I send my film to a local shop, they charge me only $1.5 (Colour)/$4 (B/W) and $6 for scanning (36 exp.) or $0.2 (colour)/$0.4 (B/W) for each print. I want to try to self develop my own film but the consumables are sometimes a bit difficult to get or quite expensiven in my country.
Anonymous
>$35 AUD to dev and scan one (1) roll of black and white film >Colour film cheaper to dev and scan (@ $29 per roll) but is counteracted by the fact colour film costs the difference so it's not any cheaper actually >a set of 6x4 prints is an extra $8 (wow le poverty size prints woo) >doesn't offer larger prints >they're just fucking digital prints of the scan >Okay it's like $8-12 a roll for black and white film if you buy in lots of 5/10. That's alright >Oh look there's these black and white films designed specifically to use C41 developement so you can use the cheaper colour printing we offer! >C41 black and white film is $25 a roll AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Anonymous
>>4482738 >$35 AUD What city?
Go somewhere else or learn how to do it yourself. $35 is a scam
Anonymous
>>4482740 >What city? Sydney. Granted I've only spoken to two shops, so my data might be skewed.
>Go somewhere else or learn how to do it yourself. $35 is a scam Yes I am
>>4482315 anon and am in the process of DIY.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482743 I am in Melbounre, irohas photo are quick and cheap, scans the same day
ikigai film lab do better scans but you pay more for it (you also can't pick up the negs, post only) , and the bloke is a bit of nutcase on ig
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Buffalo Edition
Please post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.
old thread:
>>4457140 Thread Question: How important is the use of a darkroom to your film photography?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482190 >>4482196 or you can just develop the same, in which case it's called rating, not pushing/pulling
more common with color film which gets color shifts if you change development times
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482196 If he is going -1 it is pulling the film, but you are correct about everything else.
>>4482199 It would be underexposing the film, but then you can compensate for that with extended development time, which is why you get more grain and increased contrast. Most films are just fine with going a stop up or down in exposure with standard dev time although not all. Cheap films like fomapan are already rated about 1 stop higher than they technically should be.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482190 If you want to mess with pushing and pulling film I would recommend trying ilford hp5+. It looks really good shot anywhere from like 12 iso all the way up to 1600 or higher. You just need to develop it correctly.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482196 > and you should shoot the entire roll at this pushed speed. Not to overcomplicate things for the guy that asked, but with black and white technically you can compensate variable iso on the same roll if you use a super dilute stand development, something like one to 100 rodinal or something like that. You get crushed contrast on everything but at least it’s usable. Not that I’d recommend anyone do it intentionally, but if you make that mistake that we all make at some point to change mid roll, then it is recoverable at least.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
PeruAnon here, Feel kinda stuck lately I did some more studio shooting and some nudes (can't share because reasons) but I feel like documentary work is still my way to go However, I feel like I'm on the verge of getting better but can't see where I need to improve in my photography for this to happen Anyone here, who has seen my work over time, with some advice?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
If it's wrong, why is it so good?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4473816 >>4473212 >>4473207 Who are these retards that don’t put a maximum on iso, I shoot P and it’s great every time , when things are fast put it on S, manual mode is for dorks who want to make things harder for themselves for no reason other than ‘I’m a pro now’. P does better than you
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4473212 Retard if you're gonna post Yoshitoshi ABe on /p/ you have to post the drawings with the SMEGMA
>FOVEON WON Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4478172 Eletronic viewfinder.
He's trying to say he's better than you cause he uses a small lens to focus.
Anonymous
For me, it's gotta be Snap Distance Priority Mode. Ricoh Chads rise up!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482474 Real Ricoh chads use af-s with the shutter set to snap on full press, rather than dedicated snap mode, for the best of both worlds
Anonymous
Have any of you working/professional anons had any luck becoming a "high end" photographer/videographer? By which I mean, the kind of person who only works with more discerning, high-paying clients? I run a business that does sound and video recording for classical and jazz musicians (there's some photography in there too) and whilst my skills are pretty good, I've realised that I will never make good money or work make truly great recordings until I get better quality clients. It's not just about money, but rather the willingness and ability of these clients to work under the conditions needed to make a good product, whilst also respecting my work enough to actually cooperate. I've realised half of the issue is just price. Doubling prices has helped get rid of the bad clients however the issue with "high-end" clients is that they are usually rich people who do not live in my shitty area and therefore don't know me. I know full well that a facebook ad will not fix this. I haven't been here in a while so pardon me if this is a faggish question to answer, but last time I was here there was a decent number of current or former professionals.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Is anyone else noticing a big drop in engagement on flickr over the last year or 2? I know its dropped alot since its peak, but it feels like its significantly dropped again over the last year or so.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4479479 >>4481604 This sums it up pretty much.
The only channels still alive are the ones of influencers who get free shit to review and market their lightroom presets. I think humanity is steering to a new trend of less media intake. Truning off phone notifications, no X, no insta. I believe at some point fine art, laid back galleries, craftmanship gonna thrive again. Not in the sense of getting thousands likes but to showcase you as a person to few selected people that care. Not commercialized, not for the money but out of love and passion. In the end for everyone it's much more fullfilling. It's natural and it's human unlike social media like used in the last decade.
Anonymous
We need to cause some kind of an offline revolution desu. Or a campaign against smartphones at the very least. Make the internet a physical location you visit again. Fuck the Thielites and the megacorpos and what theyre doing to humanity. At this rate we'll be some Eloi pet in a generation or two.
Anonymous
>>4482293 IMO*. No idea why is autocorrected to Desu.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482294 /p/ has a couple of autocorrects like s o y > based
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4481603 >people abusing groups for a certain lens/camera model/topic Yep, like when I wanted to look at the K-3 III group’s photos and got blasted with hundreds of pics from some F1 race day or when I looked at the gallery for some PowerShot and it was, literally, all bus pics from some autist in England somewhere. Please learn to share the gallery space.
Anonymous
Got this Osmo for a decent price, is it good for vlogging?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477692 You bought it, literally just try it. No one knows your quality requirements or conditions but I would say yes. Gimbal stabilized footage is much better to watch than the clowns who try to use their dSLR type cameras, even ones with S-tier stabilization like Panasonic and Olympus, for vlogging. But if you are shooting in available light in dark conditions it is not going to look good.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
You couldn't have gotten a worse camera.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477692 Whats the point in asking how good something is after you've already bought it?
The person best placed your question is you.