This is the post for stupid questions that don't deserve their own thread.

Your worst nightmare edition

Previously: >>4468045

Lately I have seen a lot of studios offering this kind of service now. It looks a good way to make some extra money.
People use different kinds of setups and I'm trying to figure it out the best one for a better result. So far, I think a macro flash is the best option. Also, after the photo of the eye is taken, an intense photoshop edit is required to clean up the eye and ingest it in a template to achieve the final picture as this one.
What are your thoughts about it? Let's talk.

I saw that message bout gear, that gear threads are not wanted, however I have nobody to ask so here's my question. I just bought Hoya HD MK2 protective filter for my canon RF 100-500 L because I am going to do photos in extreme conditions so I don't want my front lens to get dirty or scratch etc. What do you think about this filter is it worth it, or I should've bought Zeiss T* UV filter or other. Thanks in advance!

contribute

>new camera for $99
>better build and image quality than $600 Pentax 17

How was that softness of 1980s centerfolds shot on Ektachrome achieved? Was it lens itself or was dude using some filters on his large format camera?

previous >>4467976

ᕕ(ˊωˋ)ᕗ

hey /p/rotogs, how do you think this photo was taken?

it dates from 2010, but based on the debris and vignette it was shot on film - so I'm thinking a monopod is more likely than a drone

I also just think this is a really cool image and captures the vibe perfectly