Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
Threads by latest replies - Page 46
Anonymous
It's a good system that's fun to use. I have a full frame Nikon but I still reach for my OM-1 most of the time. It's just a cool system that churns out great pics and does everything I need it to do while being like half the size/weight. Anyone else like this compact system.
Anonymous
>>4430557 >M43 appreciation thread Any actual appreciators ITT?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4438298 I mean yes. The reality is that everyone appreciates mft. Unironically. Even the schizos...it gives them something to talk about. Me personally, I like the pictures that come out of my camera.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Mft users are the absolute most insecure photographers to ever exist on p. Far far worse than the filmfags that insist 35mm still beats full frame digital. At least filmfags post photographs. All I see are test shots, links to other people's work and charts on here... I bet there would be a lot less trolling if there were legitimately good photographs, but there aren't.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I'm choosing between E-M1 mk2 and G9, your thoughts? I wanna use it with one of the 100-400 lenses for wildlife.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4430619 >Enjoy the colour version Maybe we could have enjoyed the colors if this weren't a 4turds sensor.
Anonymous
I don't remember taking this photo with my drone - I found it by accident on my drone's memory card. I don't recognize this place, although the only thing that seems familiar is the car in the photo, which I think might be mine. What worries me the most is that my drone doesn't take such weird photos. I can't explain it and to be honest, it worries me a little.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4442207 It's just Chinese shit glitching out anon don't worry about it
Anonymous
Anonymous
Why do nearly all modern camera systems use AF motors integrated into the lens? One would think it makes more sense to have one good autofocus motor in the body that each of your lenses can use. Moreover, whenever you upgrade your body, every lens you own gets an autofocus upgrade. Was it a result of Canon dominating the DSLR era, since EF had lens motor AF only, or are there technical problems that couldn't be solved?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4436967 >Compare a 3D printer from 5-10 years ago and one from today. Night and day difference in the speed, accuracy and noise levels of the stepper motors. Nothing changed last 10 years in motor tech. I upgraded my first printer to silent stepper drivers back in 2016. Ultimaker 2 had silent steppers and it came out in 2013. It's just now even cheapo manufacturers realized that silence is worth few extra bucks.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4436957 af in video is for degenerates
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4436891 >Slow as fuck AF >Do AF adapters even exist for these kinds of lenses? >You have to switch both lens and camera to AF/MF, otherwise bad shit will happen. It could be fun, if they packed actually powerful motor. But in reality it's just better to have it built in into lens, motors don't cost much
>>4436936 .>Until you realize that the focus groups of some lenses weigh less than an ounce and others weigh more than a pound.
With powerful motor you could drive both, lens could tell tell the limits for older lenses that didn't tell the limits, it could drive legacy mode. But this is not our reality, only good thing about it is the fact that these screwdriver AF lenses are noticeably cheaper now than as good portion of cameras can't use them with AF.
Anonymous
Anonymous
After being a loser social media hermit, I wanna make a flex instagram. You know, /fit/ pics, /fa/shion pics, /trv/el pics all of that. I don't really have a nice smartphone camera and I do not intend to get an iPhone either, but I do own a Nikon D5300 with a manual 50mm f/2, a kit 18-50mm and a 50-200mm. I also have a friend who's willing to take pictures for me in return for getting him into a new hobby that I know a fair bit about. Here's what I want to know Tell me all about editing. Never done it before since I never intended anyone else to see my pictures. I downloaded GIMP and was thinking about pirating Lightroom but I want my pictures to use as less fakery as possible. Besides, that's the culture from what I can see Is taking shirtless mirror pics with a DSLR too much? Like I said, I don't own a good phone Should I be taking RAW pics? Always did jpeg but if I'm gonna edit may as well do RAW When my friend is unavailable, how do I take pictures. I own a tripod but I don't think it's convenient to take pictures setting a timer and moving back and forth
Anonymous
Buy a remote Use lightroom for now just to get better noise reduction/rendering than shitty camera processors, and fix slight exposure/white balance issues Wait for a discounted capture one perpetual license
Anonymous
>>4437652 if all you want to do is be a vapid whore just buy an iphone on credit like the rest of the artless whores and be done with it
Anonymous
>>4442122 I've always used GIMP cause it was free. But then again I only used to photograph for fun
Remote is good advice
Capture one huh? I could just pirate both
>>4442145 I have a Samsung Note with a stylus, taking a pic with it feels vomit inducing though
I also have a Canon AE 1 program but what has that got to do with anything
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4442154 >I have a Samsung Note with a stylus yeah I told you to buy an iphone. If you want to be a photographer then buy a real camera and start the process. There's really nothing to mention
Anonymous
Quoted By:
if anything this is an anti flex imagine you're talking to someone and show them this instagram they will think you are either insanely gay or insecure now instead imagine you have no instagram and instead you give them your gf's instagram they will be jealous of you and seethe
Anonymous
Wtf is lens "character"?
Anonymous
>>4441694 >I'm an incel who posts his family pictures on 4chan so you have to do! I will rather leave you with the knowledge that every brand that focused on micro four thirds failed and fuji is getting outcompeted by the used FF market and is responding by cheapening their cameras with increasingly bad chinese manufacturing and giving up on R&D entirely.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4441711 >No, I don't have a camera or take photos Knew it
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4433316 like wouldnt it make more sense to get a uv filter with character? like damaged or cratched or muddied and have a collection these uv filters to put on you fav lens? Ive seen nice pics with damaged, cracked uv lenses giving you pic the extra push it needs. Swirly bokeh... fine maybe a vintage but they are all gay manual and I need sharp pics.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4433752 >camera left peak virgin and christian pussy >camera right STD whore dog fucker peanut butter rubbing inside anus chiuahua eating out intestinal worm slut fuck cum dump Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
How often do you buy a new camera? How many cameras do you own? What’s the reason to own more than 3?
Anonymous
>>4442056 What are some cameras you considered "nice"?
Anonymous
>>4442058 the one you have with you
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4442058 The original sony a7c is pretty nice
So is the fuji x-t4 (x-t5 is somehow worse)
Anonymous
Phone camera
Anonymous
>>4442016 Actually I posted the original here a while ago if anyone could help me get them again?
Anonymous
>>4442019 try reverse image search
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4442020 Is there a 4chan archive image searcher?
Anonymous
>>4441994 Did a Sony a7 take these?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4442039 No my sir, it was the revolutionary panasonic lumix gm5, the best camera ever made!
GM sirs!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I have one of these cameras in good shape with all the accessories and apparently these things are an overhyped meme? I had literally no idea. I inherited it and I never use it. Been thinking of selling it and I see that they go for literally $1K+ kek
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4442017 People can hold still for 1/15 which m43 can do at 60mm (120 equivalent) no problem
To do this on canon you need a $1000 lens and an R6
Anonymous
>>4442017 >nobody sane buys a smaller, better performing camera than the canon RP that is cheaper and uses cheaper, smaller, sharper lenses >sane people buy bigger, worse, more expensive camera systems huh?
Honestly if you're a hobbyist here are your options
>poor: E-M1 II, E-M5 II, GM5, 35mm film >poor but IQ autist/part time pro: A7III, A7C, Z6II >less poor: ZF, Z5II, X-T5, X100VI, 120 film >wealthy: GFX100SII, CFV100C+907X, Vintage medium format digital, large format film These cameras are for full time pros only
>Z8, Z9, R1, R3, R6II, R5, R5II, Z7II, A7IV, A7RIV/V, A7CII, A7CR These cameras are scams
>RP, R8, any sony/canon/nikon APS-C, DSLRs Anonymous
>>4442022 You forgot to add the phase on to the pro category.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4442024 Phase one users aren't "pros", they're artists.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4442022 annie leibovitz's assistant here, this is basically it, but i'd nix the gfx, it's a good utility camera but the 'blad is so much better and attaches to 500 bodies
Anonymous
Quoted By:
What cameras would you recommend, that fit on a pocket and have better image quality than Iphones? I will be using it mostly for printing photos to place on memory albuns, and maybe like 1 or 2 profile photos...I have a thing that I hate when the eyes are out of focus or blurry in photos, so I think portrait capacity would be important. Preferably if it's under 600 used and if it has interchangeable lens, even better
Anonymous
>>4441850 sony cant be good
they're flimsy and explode and turn everyone into shrek
sony is not an option you stupid fucking sony shill i am going to kill you stop recommending sony sony is bad sony is not an option you can choose smol and cute lumix or big ugly canikon blob no others SONY IS NOT A FUCKING OPTION PLEASE BUY A PANASONIC ;_;
Anonymous
>>4441850 >that's why you have to flat out lie any time someone recommends sony So what you're saying is that they only sell more cameras when you move the goalposts and add caveats?
>because never, EVER, ever, EVER, can anyone ever accept that there is a better alternative to micro four thirds or the lumix s9 or whatever Once again this one lil fella going apeshit on brands literally no one mentioned
>any time someone recommends sony >someone No it's just you. Stop lying.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4441856 >caveat: not counting canon's walmart ewaste That's the only caveat
Don't you have a fake julia trotti comparison to post
Anonymous
>>4441852 This but unironically
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4441765 very
>>4441895 this but even more unironically.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
going to post some photoseries
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4441289 post some of your photos
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4441291 >i've seen this one a few times and it's still awesome. saved. thanks man. this is a mountain called Matterhorn Peak in the sawtooth range in california. My friend emily was leading the way because i was gassed and thats her in the photo. send me an email at lightwertks.contact @ gmail and i'll send you the high res photo if you want
Anonymous
Do you have an Instagram handle?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4440942 Ever heard of cars? They can get you places.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4441697 @lightwerks.studio