Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 48

No.4438524 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
So which one am I supposed to buy?
Peak Design or Falcam?
15 posts omitted

Un simple apasionado.

No.4438496 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
I love photography.

Or at least that's what I think every time I see a good photo!! I'm incredibly passionate about it and I'm studying to become great at it. I'm going to share a bit of my art with you below. I hope you can genuinely guide me on this path I'm just embarking on with my own hands. Yes, it's personal, it's the only thing that calms me and gives me peace for now.
And as I read somewhere, it's not the weapon, but the soldier who carries it.
7 posts and 5 images omitted

No.4440699 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
>lurk /p/
>all I care about is gear and specs and feel nothing is good enough
>stop lurking
>actually go out and shoot
>have fun and realise basically anything is fine
Gear really is a meme
36 posts and 2 images omitted

OM-1 vs K-1ii:

No.4433450 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
I've spent about 2 years shooting with a beat up canon 70d I got on craigslist and I'm ready to drop some money on a new camera. I've narrowed my choices down to these two because of the following:

- Rugged and actually weather sealed
- I like the build quality, feel and color rendering of the lenses (HD pentax D-FAs and the OM pro f/2.8s)
- Comfortably in my budget used (with lenses)

I'm leaning more towards the OM because I will be backpacking a lot and the weight savings are attractive (especially with telephoto), however I'm willing to put up with the weight if the pentax will have outstandingly better image quality.

My use-case will be travel with a bit of wildlife photography, I will shoot everything in RAW and edit, and all of my photos will be shared online or printed to a max of 11x17". I also never carry a tripod/monopod.

Some of my pros for each system:
OM-1
>lightweight and compact
>m43 wider DOF
>more variety of modern glass
>cheaper telephoto options

K-1ii
>higher resolution (can crop for wildlife)
>better dynamic range and color depth
>better in low light?

I'm sure everyone will tell me to go full frame and go to the gym but I was hoping to get some additional perspective, ideally from someone who has owned both FF and modern m43.

Some additional points:
-I know they are both dead systems
-No I will not get a canon/nikon/sony

Thanks for your time
32 posts and 3 images omitted

No.4419876 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>you no longer need thousands of dollars worth of expensive photography gear, a computer workstation and an adobe suite subscription to create professional quality photos
>all you need is your smartphone and AI
It's truly over, isn't it?
176 posts and 13 images omitted

No.4439654 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
How come we don't have a /p/ magazine/photobook or something? Every month we could give a theme and maybe people vote on what gets in, then we can publish it as a pdf for all /p/ users
I've yet to properly work out the logistics but that's what this thread is for
64 posts and 3 images omitted

Filters

No.4439302 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
So I bought this and am too scared on bringing this with me on my travels due to the cost. I want to go to a rally even and fear dust and stone with fuck up my CPL.
4 posts omitted

No.4440640 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
actually probably the best photo i’ve taken. in hawaii, on maui
6 posts and 1 image omitted

No.4440519 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
just arrived in hawaii, this shit is beautiful AF
6 posts omitted

No.4440486 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
>make a thread about how great m43 is in low light
>banned from all boards
First off why not ban me from just /p/, second why the fuck am I banned for proving how a format so often bullied is actually great?