I want that retro film feel that turns head without the headache of viewfinders with manual focus and development/scanning. Is refurbishing the inside with digital the way to go?

Hello
I will be dumping photos from the DTLA Protests on June 8. If you were there and took any photos feel free to share them here too, image limit allowing. comment/critique welcome as it relates to the photos; if you want to discuss the politics of the event there's a different board on this website that starts with /p/. Most shots are on Gold 200 or Ultramax 400 through my SRT200 and a Vivitar 28-210 f/3.5-5.6; a few are from a crappy 90s minolta point and shoot and some are shot with Psychedelic Blues #5 (which is just hand-fogged Ultramax 400).

Is recording the reality of war an important job? How can we talk about foreign affairs without knowing what is really happening on the ground? Can photography speak the truth in times of devastation and disinformation?

I am searching for a vintage lens with character that should fit on my EF DSLR Canon body (future I plan to go Canon R5).

Now I want this vintage to stand out. Some imperfection to make my pictures interesting. At first I wanted wide angle, but I'm not sure if I am just reducing my possibilities of finding something nice. I only have till Friday to decide and would appreciate some info.

>https://amateurphotographer.com/second-hand/best-vintage-lenses/

All info is pointing me towards:
>Helios 44-2 58mm f/2: Soviet-era lens with distinctive swirly bokeh.
>Asahi Super-Takumar 50mm f/1.4: Sharp, radioactive (thorium) lens with warm rendering.
>Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/2.8: High contrast and sharpness, nicknamed “Eagle’s Eye”.
>Nikkor 105mm f/2.5: Legendary portrait lens used for iconic images like “Afghan Girl”.
>Zuiko 50mm f/1.4: Compact, fast prime with smooth bokeh.
>Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 35mm f/2: Wide-angle prime with excellent sharpness.
>Contax/Yashica (C/Y)
>Yashica ML 50mm f/1.7: Affordable standard lens with balanced performance.
>Summicron-R 50mm f/2: Premium optics with sharpness and pleasing bokeh.
>Minox Color Minotar 35mm F2.8
>Pentax Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4
>Minolta 50mm f/1.4
>Canon FD 50mm f/1.4 SSC
>Helios 40 85mm f/1.5
>Jupiter 11 135mm f/4
Any experience with these? Whats your take on it?
>https://strawpoll.com/61gD97qeOZw

anyone else copping? $49 and its photos got such a vibe. can just wear as a keychain so much more portable than crappy old digishits. this WILL be the hot camera this summer. so don't miss out senpai

Help i do not know where to turn. I normally at home in the other boards.
I got married so we hired a photographer to shoot our wedding. We were able to haggle him down to 1500$ for the wedding, feast and the afterparty (He first quoted us for 1800$ first, lol).
So we payed a lot of money for it and the images and the book he provided were amazing.
But he took way more pictures than what he gave us. So i asked him for all the pics. He refused because he got paid for edited pics. So i told him i like the images natural no need to edited them.
He first denied, but i threatened him with chargeback, because i payed him to take images and he withheld them from me.
He sent me 250gb worth of files. All of them .cr3 files. I could not open them at first and needed some complicated software made by Adobe. After i got that (and paid for that) i was shocked: All the images look like total dogshit. The colors are boring and unsaturated they are not sharp.
He either is a scam because he took shit pictures and edited them to fool us OR this is plain fraud because he manipulated the files to look awful.
He blocked me and my wife on Instagram and is not replying to Emails. My wife wants to lawyer up because of the obvious fraud and charged back the payment. But i want to try to salvage the images at least.
So please help me.

When I was growing up, we had to learn about DSLRs in school because they were seen as the next best thing. People thought a new revolution would occur in cinema with independent short films being easier than ever to make. But I hated learning photography on a DSLR, since many videos would come out with heaps of noise.
Do you think DSLRs even changed the world with its ability to make easy short films?

A series of Grimace Eggs. Photography acts as justice, as documentary; it bears witness when eyes cannot. Even in death, the photograph can illuminate the truth, whether that be in the everyday, in the quotidian, in plastic waste that pollutes a cemetery, in what we cannot salvage.

What the fuck is a tariff edition

All video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.
Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.
We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.
In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.

>STICKY - https://text.is/QZ1J
>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ

>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVE

Previous thread >>4407161

Quick FAQS
>what’s the best camera available on a “budget”?
The blackmagic pocket cinema camera 4k, or the Panasonic gh5 (can pick one up for like 500 bucks atm)
>what’s a good beginner video camera?
Anything that works, shoots at least 1080p and preferably has interchangeable lenses. Any recommendation beyond that will cause arguments so read the fucking sticky if that isn't satisfactory.
>What's a good sound solution that won't break the bank?
Zoom h1
>Can I use a zoom lens for video?
Yes
>Do I need cine lenses?
No
>Do I need 4k?
No. 1080 looks great on a cinema screen. 4k looks better.
>Can someone tell me if my video is any good?
Yes, but be prepared to receive harsh criticism. If you're going to waste 5 minutes of our time with a shitty out-of-focus montage of nothing then we'll tell you that it's crap
>Is it okay to dox myself?
...Personally I wouldn't but what do I know?

I'm not even Puerto Rican, but let's go.