Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 59

What went wrong?

No.4435728 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Take me back.
43 posts and 13 images omitted

No.4433648 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
>supposed to only use primes
>dude le zoom with your feet
OK so how do I take photos of things further away than I can walk?
25 posts and 2 images omitted
!!Ekfrj1YNcq6

Fuck is this shit again

!!Ekfrj1YNcq6 No.4428886 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
There's a sucker born every minute
23 posts and 6 images omitted

Visual Arts

No.4436352 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
What can drawing and painting and sculpting do that photography cannot do? Similar aspects of composition and arrangement, style and form, techniques and themes, can all be harnessed in photography.
18 posts and 6 images omitted

/GEAR/ Containment Thread

No.4428429 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Dead system edition.
I love dead systems. They all have the lenses I need, no new lenses to tempt your money and cheap AF.

Previous thread >>4424884
419 posts and 47 images omitted

No.4436417 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
As an absolute amateur, should I start with a film camera, learn that, and then learn digital? Or does it not matter to learn film?

Photography School

No.4428698 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Is it worth it? I showed my portfolio and the staff at the college seemed supportive. I'm not sure if they're just trying to get students' money.
Would they really admit me if I had no photographic eye / talent?
26 posts and 2 images omitted

Editing a Photobook

No.4434343 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
I wanna make a photobook. I have 50-60 snaps of cars I've been getting in Bratislava for the last few years. I've been trying to do it with a photoshop doc with a billion layers which I will eventually export to a pdf for printing but is there a better way to do it?
16 posts and 9 images omitted

Why did the 135mm fall out of favor?

No.4429230 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
If you handle any amount of film-era camera gear you will almost always find a 135mm when buying somebody's old kit. It seems to me like it was the second most popular focal length after 50mm. So why is it that almost nobody cares about 135mm today?
28 posts and 4 images omitted