My Sony A7Sii started to make this rattling noise when I attach a zoom lens. It seems like it can't decide on one shutter speed and the aperture keeps fighting not sure what to do. The only way it stops is if I focus out all the way but once I do that I can no longer adjust focus
Can I fix this on my own or do I gotta take it into a professional? My issue is I live somewhere rural and closest place is 150 miles away so hoping not to have to go that far
sup /p/ I've started a new project documenting junkyard and pick-n-pulls in my area! I went to one as a kid a bunch of years ago and ever since have been dying to go back. I find them really interesting, its an environment you really never get to experience. Its sort of surreal seeing all the old cars ripped apart, and having free reign to do basically whatever you want to them (as long as you pay) is sort of freeing? I'm also a big car nerd to its fun trying to find interesting cars or just seeing how they work. Anyways, I intend to visit these places and document not only the environments but also the people. I think eventually I'd love to do portraits of the workers, especially with their tools. Last time I went I was too nervous to ask anyone so maybe if you have any tips on asking strangers, especially while theyre working, for photos that would be great. I hope you enjoy these photos and maybe they will inspire you or something. If this isn't your thing, then just pass on by. Thanks!
I recently got access to a lot of family photos from late 90's, early 00's, and I want to scan and organize them. Scanning is fine, but I want a tool or something that allows me to quickly add metadata (date, place) to them since they are analog photos with the date in the bottom corner. Until I don't find something better, Google Photos automatically creates albums, timelines and such after I do that. What software do you recommend for adding metadata and/or an offline alternative to google photos? with the same abilty of automatically sorting them. This is a new datahoarding venture for me but I'm excited.
I just went to a Vivian Maier exhibition, pic related, her Rolleiflex. There were great photos, sure, but negatives were also shown sometimes: from what I've seen on average one or two shots out of a 12 exposure roll were any good, and that made me feel like photography is a numbers game. I'm kinda new to photography, I've learned the technical basics, but I really don't know shit about composition, and seeing the other failed or sub-par shots made me question the whole theory behind it.
Most pictures were full frame prints made in the last 10 years, sometimes the original print she made was displayed alongside showing how she edited the negatives (mostly cropping, but I've noticed some dodging/burning), meaning that all the full frame prints were probably not the intended outcome, at which point I question what I'm actually seeing, whether the actual artistic intent or just an attempt to milk the negatives, which were but a step in the process.
Then there's the whole "she tried getting recognition, but went nowhere, just to be discovered after death by random chance". I knew about the second part, I didn't know she tried to get noticed. How insanely arbitrary that is, which in turn throws shade on the value that is given to her photos.
I'm not a /p/ autist, I know very little and expected to get something positive out of this experience, but it generated more questions and doubts than answers and knowledge. I want to know anons' opinion on the subject.
