Is recording the reality of war an important job? How can we talk about foreign affairs without knowing what is really happening on the ground? Can photography speak the truth in times of devastation and disinformation?
I am searching for a vintage lens with character that should fit on my EF DSLR Canon body (future I plan to go Canon R5).
Now I want this vintage to stand out. Some imperfection to make my pictures interesting. At first I wanted wide angle, but I'm not sure if I am just reducing my possibilities of finding something nice. I only have till Friday to decide and would appreciate some info.
>https://amateurphotographer.com/second-hand/best-vintage-lenses/
All info is pointing me towards:
>Helios 44-2 58mm f/2: Soviet-era lens with distinctive swirly bokeh.
>Asahi Super-Takumar 50mm f/1.4: Sharp, radioactive (thorium) lens with warm rendering.
>Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/2.8: High contrast and sharpness, nicknamed “Eagle’s Eye”.
>Nikkor 105mm f/2.5: Legendary portrait lens used for iconic images like “Afghan Girl”.
>Zuiko 50mm f/1.4: Compact, fast prime with smooth bokeh.
>Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 35mm f/2: Wide-angle prime with excellent sharpness.
>Contax/Yashica (C/Y)
>Yashica ML 50mm f/1.7: Affordable standard lens with balanced performance.
>Summicron-R 50mm f/2: Premium optics with sharpness and pleasing bokeh.
>Minox Color Minotar 35mm F2.8
>Pentax Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4
>Minolta 50mm f/1.4
>Canon FD 50mm f/1.4 SSC
>Helios 40 85mm f/1.5
>Jupiter 11 135mm f/4
Any experience with these? Whats your take on it?
>https://strawpoll.com/61gD97qeOZw
