I learned about the isolation triangle, aperture, ISO, and shutter speed, not by using an old film camera but a DSLR with manual mode. Am I just slow at learning this all? I needed immediate feedback by checking the preview on the display LCD. But, with film cameras, the labs adjust your photos in post-production before sending them back. It was just too hard to learn it all in my head, without any way to review what I had taken. Am I dumb? Is photography not for me?

I am going to buy one as soon as they hit the market in early Novemeber. I hope I get the 1987 edition. It's fire.
Which one are you hoping to score?
You are going to be getting one right /p/?
You aren't gonna be a contrarian try hard no Charmera /p/haggot are you /p/? ISHYDDT

ᕕ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ᕗ

>He doesn't export all his photos as .dngs onto hard drives to have timeless, future proofs for when proprietary "RAW" files become obsolete
NGMI

Took these yesterday with my Galaxy s24, 30 second exposure, ISO 3200. Will post the originals as well.

Please post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.
old thread: >>4460704

I just copied and pasted the old OP because no one would bake a new bread

Thread Question: To what extent do you digitally edit your film scans?

What are your favorite Lightroom presets to work with? I have a hard time finding something because they either turn the photo in a depressive nightmare with dull dark colors or they change skin colors to yellow. Looking for something more vibrant, happy with punchy colors and still natural, not overprocessed.

>2025
>no fast 28mm af prime for mirrorless Nikon Canon Sony
what gives?

>2025
>no fast af 28mm prime from mirrorless Nikon Canon Sony
what gives?

What is the point of liminal aesthetics? It's supposed to be spooky but most of the photographs are just blurry, oversaturated, with fucked up shadows and highlights, yellowish vibrance.