Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 15

— Photo Challenge 59 —

No.4295821 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
• Theme: Imitation
• Deadline: From 17 March to 7 April

Theme:
• Submissions have to try replicate a specific work of art (a painting, another photograph)
• You have to include the name and author of the original
• You are not limited in what works you can replicate. If You'd like you can also replicate other submissions

Rules:
• Photo must be taken during the timeline. Images taken before this thread was started won't count.
• Post images with exif, if possible. If you can't, just state that they were taken during the timeline.
• Three entries per photographer max.
• A day after the competition ends, all valid images will be posted for voting.

Optional:
• You're encouraged to post your images that fit the theme even if they're out of competition.
• You may name your images if you wish.

Other:
• Feedback on the themes or the organization of the competition is greatly appreciated.
• The example is an imitation of Edward Hopper's "Morning Sun"
26 posts and 3 images omitted

No.4299193 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
What are some rules or tricks that will help you get better at taking photos?
The one i have so far is only 1 shot per scene. No more 20 shots burst.
What do you do to help you get better?
1 post omitted

Fumography

No.4274084 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Post fumo photos

old thread
>>4120462
43 posts and 23 images omitted

Copy cat snappers

No.4295609 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Why is it that when I'm spotted with my camera trying to take a picture of something people immediately come up and also take a picture in the same direction using their smartphones? They don't even know why or what I am looking at.

Is this mental Illness of not wanting to be left out?
20 posts omitted

Film General Thread /fgt/

No.4298187 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Home Development Edition

Previous thread >>4296564

/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit
>negative film ages better than positive
>black and white better than color
>slow films better than fast
>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years
>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited
>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.
>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 process


Useful links
>[massive dev chart] gives times for home film development
https://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php
>[film dev] shows results of development regimes
https://filmdev.org/
>[news & community links]
35mmc.com
casualphotophile.com
kosmofoto.com
emulsive.org
japancamerahunter.com

So, gas station battery water, do you use it when you mix your C41 chems or do you just go for that delicious tap?
353 posts and 104 images omitted

No.4297430 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
35mm Summicron ASPH tattoo on my arm and Leica M7 tattoo on my leg (yes, I met a woman in a bar and let her stab me… now we are great friends lol)
55 posts and 3 images omitted

No.4292823 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
what would you call this genre of image?
i find them very pleasing and i want to find more but i dont even know what to be looking for
10 posts and 2 images omitted

No.4303578 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
AI generation will NEVER replace the talent of an articulate human.
3 posts and 1 image omitted

No.4303613 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Why is it that when I film in higher resolutions, the colors become much different (better, more natural looking).

I have a sonya6400, and the 4k footage has tremendously bette colors than 1080p footage. And I now just got a new gopro, and I see the same pattern. 4k has much better (more natural) colors than 1080p, and 5,3k is even better than 4k.

I've also tried youtubing some resulotion comparison videos on the same camera (with the same settings), and it's the same. Higher quality nearly always produces better and more natural colors.

What the hell is going on? I would like to not be limited to the highest possible resolution, but I just cannot unsee how bad the colors look on 1080p.