>>4435051For archiving its good. But an inert gas sealed HDD is going to be just as reliable.
The singular and uncontrovertible upside is that you have physical evidence that the photograph is in no way shape or form doctored (aka AI generated). This will probably become increasingly important.
Otherwise, subjectively, film does look much better than most digital photographs in my opinion. Yes, there is a layer of digital interpretation with scanning, but nobody says the colors you capture with a digital camera aren't "real", or if they do, they are seriously confused. Printing is great. People should optically print their negatives and THEN scan for some very good results for sharing. Otherwise printing is just amazing anyway.
That's really it. Everything else is bullshit. Expense is retarded. Development is retarded. Scanning is autistic. But if you can ignore all of that and make good images, it really is an art.