Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 21

camera /p/urse thread

No.4461465 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Post your man bags
34 posts and 14 images omitted

/gear/ containment thread

No.4475772 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Previous thread: >>4473842
322 posts and 35 images omitted

No.4467935 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
What is it with people that shoot on film?
Film is expensive to film, develop and scan.

Yet what do they do? They film the most mundane bullshit.
Traffic lights. Or some mediocre bullshit to some obscure indie song.

Why do they all do this?

If you're gonna spend hundreds of dollars. Atleast film something good. But it's like they think the vintage aesthetic will make their shit good.

It's like they just want to see what their mundane boring life would look like on film.
78 posts and 9 images omitted

No.4477708 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
The findings reveal that landscape pictures on Instagram echo Romantic era paintings, using similar motifs and aesthetic strategies. Instagrammers, like 19th-century Romantic painters, emphasize themes of solitude, mystification, sublimity, and nostalgia, contrasting sharply with contemporary issues like ecological crises. By staging and aesthetically transforming nature, Instagrammers medially reverse the destruction of nature and create idealized landscapes that evoke a bygone, pre-industrial era and an intact human-nature relationship. Accordingly, landscape images on Instagram can be interpreted as a new idealized, romantic reality or as a postmodern reinvention of Romanticism. Instagrammers seek out photo locations based on their ability to synthesize as many physical elements as possible into an ‘instagrammable’ scenery, creating a stereotypical romantic landscape image.
6 posts and 1 image omitted

Post-processing

No.4475496 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Alright, /p/. I got my first nice camera JUST IN TIME for a 2-week vacation where I shot over 14,000 photos in various levels of motion, light, and subject type. Throughout my trip I experimented a lot and really started to internalize the exposure triangle to the point where I'm perfectly comfortable shooting manual without any confusion or issues.

At this point, I feel like I've learned enough that I just need to practice practice practice, but I have almost zero experience with post-processing photos. I have over a decade of casual experience with Adobe programs, so I'm at least familiar with image stuff, but it was mostly UX design and motion graphics. I'm a bit colorblind, so I fear I'll never be able to do any decent color grading, but I'd really like to start dipping my toes into post-processing photos so I can start shooting in super low light, and generally just touching up my favorite shots.

What tips do you have for a beginner here? What software, workflow, techniques, etc. do you use, and what things should you always do, or avoid doing in post?
15 posts and 4 images omitted

Photography Books

No.4465912 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
How important is it to study photography through the library? What books do you recommend for beginners? What are the best photo books?
64 posts and 4 images omitted

R zn gsv gifgs uiln dsrxs blf ifm

No.4477846 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
R zn gsv yfoovg rm gsv tfm (zmw R xlmgilo blf) R zn gsv gifgs uiln dsrxs blf ifm (zmw R xlmgilo blf) R zn gsv hrovmxrmt nzxsrmv (zmw R xlmgilo blf) R zn gsv vmw lu zoo blfi wivznh (zmw R xlmgilo blf)
4 posts omitted

No.4477874 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Is taking a screenshot and cropping it photography?

No.4477431 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
What's the best film grainy emulation halation dreamy vintage type x mount lens? Just bought an XH2S and want to shoot kino. Preferably under $600 and I only really shoot like somewhere between 16-24mm or something. Thanks a lot
23 posts and 1 image omitted

Optics

No.4477601 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Where can I learn about optics and optical science? I want to know more about cameras to the point I could know everything about a camera’s settings without looking at metadata. I want to know if I can work out a camera’s settings or lens just by looking at a photograph and analysing it.
For instance, can you work out the shutter speed or aperture through deduction if you already know the ISO or focal length or distance to subject or depth of field? My question is about the exposure triangle and knowing whether one element in a camera’s setting can give you clues to the other elements.
Surely there have been forensics used on this level, in some sort of criminal case. Or do they usually only look for manufacturing clues for the camera’s build and make?
1 post omitted