Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
Threads by latest replies - Page 21
Anonymous
Post your man bags
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4461465 I currently just carry my camera on a diagonal shoulder strap. I used a camera bag for a while but I haven't found it particularly convenient, and found stashing my camera away is a great way to keep me from taking photos.
I could do with a good all purpose backpack though and some way to store a lens or two and some filters, that type of stuff.
Pretty happy carrying my stuff on the strap right now.
I carry everything from film P&S to an R6 II with 24-70 2.8 and battery grip on a strap.
Anonymous
I'm thinking about getting something that holds a big lens (canon 24-105 won't fit my jeans pocket) for times when I'm shooting at an event but can't be bothered to carry my whole bag with me at all times but still need one lens for change. some kind of milsurp pouch that could go on my pants belt? any ideas?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477453 >(canon 24-105 won't fit my jeans pocket) >>(canon 24-105 won't fit my jeans pocket) >>>(canon 24-105 won't fit my jeans pocket) Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477453 buttpacks, take your pick: us alice, british mod, etc.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
this is how i carry the hasseblad so that its always around my neck even in the bag.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Previous thread:
>>4473842
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477476 >/pol/ schizo injects its pet conspiracy theories into every single discussion, forever many such cases
they are truly NPCs
now say something about jews and trump
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477474 It does say 'cosmetic condition', but yeah they should sell this as 'spares and repairs'.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Menacer, Nightshark or Insurgent?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477474 Would be more honest to list it as "for parts"
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Looking for a cheap 23mm lens for my sony camera There's two TTartisan ones, a manual and an AF one (f/1.4 and 1.8 respectively). Is the AF version really that much better?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
What is it with people that shoot on film? Film is expensive to film, develop and scan. Yet what do they do? They film the most mundane bullshit. Traffic lights. Or some mediocre bullshit to some obscure indie song. Why do they all do this? If you're gonna spend hundreds of dollars. Atleast film something good. But it's like they think the vintage aesthetic will make their shit good. It's like they just want to see what their mundane boring life would look like on film.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477186 >I'm white Post hands.
I find it hard to believe a first worlder would struggle with recharging a battery every once in a while.
Maybe if you live in a backwards shithole like Greece, I'd understand.
cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE
>>4477615 For me, it's 6-2-8.
Anonymous
The idea that I could have fucked up an entire photography trip, and wouldn't even know it until days later scares me.
Sugar !egyYvoBZV2
Quoted By:
>>4477627 >Not 1-4-88 I shiggy diggy rest in peace biggy my niggy
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477712 Back when we were still a functioning society, One hour photo used to be on every corner. How far we’ve fallen.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
The findings reveal that landscape pictures on Instagram echo Romantic era paintings, using similar motifs and aesthetic strategies. Instagrammers, like 19th-century Romantic painters, emphasize themes of solitude, mystification, sublimity, and nostalgia, contrasting sharply with contemporary issues like ecological crises. By staging and aesthetically transforming nature, Instagrammers medially reverse the destruction of nature and create idealized landscapes that evoke a bygone, pre-industrial era and an intact human-nature relationship. Accordingly, landscape images on Instagram can be interpreted as a new idealized, romantic reality or as a postmodern reinvention of Romanticism. Instagrammers seek out photo locations based on their ability to synthesize as many physical elements as possible into an ‘instagrammable’ scenery, creating a stereotypical romantic landscape image.
Anonymous
>>4477801 Maybe they thought your essay insisted upon itself too much, ever think of that?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477817 >was 4 years into a huge nationwide photo essay on immediate environmental issues that affect us all, until >Maybe they thought how would they think that when they didnt see it, did they time travel?
Anonymous
>>4477801 >They've even created gods in their image to enforce and reward their suicidal cultural meme. Such as?
Anonymous
>>4477960 Gau Mata/the golden bull, god of the goyim
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477971 Isn't that a Hindu god?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Alright, /p/. I got my first nice camera JUST IN TIME for a 2-week vacation where I shot over 14,000 photos in various levels of motion, light, and subject type. Throughout my trip I experimented a lot and really started to internalize the exposure triangle to the point where I'm perfectly comfortable shooting manual without any confusion or issues. At this point, I feel like I've learned enough that I just need to practice practice practice, but I have almost zero experience with post-processing photos. I have over a decade of casual experience with Adobe programs, so I'm at least familiar with image stuff, but it was mostly UX design and motion graphics. I'm a bit colorblind, so I fear I'll never be able to do any decent color grading, but I'd really like to start dipping my toes into post-processing photos so I can start shooting in super low light, and generally just touching up my favorite shots. What tips do you have for a beginner here? What software, workflow, techniques, etc. do you use, and what things should you always do, or avoid doing in post?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>SQUARE CROP FROM THE TOP ROPE >>4476171 Don't save your first pass as HEIF because there's no compatibility for it outside of huehue le macintoss. The world runs on JPG.
No harm in converting it to that for your own uses if there's compatilibity but beware the conversion process is making its own assumptions about your image when it does its magic.
Anonymous
I don't understand why people even try to post prod these kinds of shitty pictures. It's literally hurting my eye. You should buy some film camera and learn when not to take a picture
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477850 >learn when not to take a picture this level of intuition is only given by the angels of heaven
Anonymous
>>4477850 >Learning and practicing how to process is completely useless unless the picture is perfect to begin with Well, obviously the answer is that you should share some of your great work so we can all practice our processing with it
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4478033 >let he who is with good photo cast the first rock
Anonymous
Quoted By:
How important is it to study photography through the library? What books do you recommend for beginners? What are the best photo books?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4475940 This kinda happened to me and a couple of friends, it just means you reached a technical level of a pro but also the mind of a drone faggot pro cunt who delivers perfectly good product but nothing that he really likes or cares about, the kind of guy who can answer the hows but not the single why.
If you shoot on auto or something you like (aperture or shutter priority) and just go for photos you like but don't know why you will probably find again your inner, real tastes. The trick is to not overthink, just see shit you like and quickly take a pic, if you start wondering how to perfect the settings then you will bust your mind, just check the composition and there's that.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4475940 You are confused about the D2x, which takes a skillled and intellegent photographer to get consistantly successful pictures from it.
Anonymous
>>4466027 fascinating to see that /p/ can't detect a patently obvious b8 image/post
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4475940 >if I make shit up without evidence people will believe me sure, post your good old photos LMAO
cinefag
Quoted By:
>>4476928 Par for the course really. Most people here are tourists who don't engage with the majority of 4chan and don't know the culture. They didn't even understand Sneed for a long, long time. It's an insular community that doesn't recognize infamous 4chan material that has been posted for over a decade now. You'd think someone interested in photography would at least use /tv/, /ic/ or /lit/ but they're not. You press them and the only boards they tend to crosspost on are the likes of /a/ or even /b/. Which explains why they care so much what a camera looks like, they're trying to cosplay basically. Unsurprisingly being weebs a lot of them are trannies, the pipeline is real.
anon
Quoted By:
R zn gsv yfoovg rm gsv tfm (zmw R xlmgilo blf) R zn gsv gifgs uiln dsrxs blf ifm (zmw R xlmgilo blf) R zn gsv hrovmxrmt nzxsrmv (zmw R xlmgilo blf) R zn gsv vmw lu zoo blfi wivznh (zmw R xlmgilo blf)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477851 Are the first three words "I am gay"? Seems like he repeats them a lot and it would make perfect sense...
Anonymous
>>4477855 if one went back to the 1930s they'd be better off tracking down a few key people's parents and whacking them. Knowing what you know now, getting away with moida in the 1930s would be a piece of cake, and you'd come back to a totally different world.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477910 Oppenheimer was already grown up in the 30s.
Anonymous
>>4477851 And he posted the key in the image.
How boring.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477983 So what did he say? I can't be bothered to spend 20 minutes on this.
Anonymous
Is taking a screenshot and cropping it photography?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477874 Sure. Not that much worse than most of the pictures posted here.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
What's the best film grainy emulation halation dreamy vintage type x mount lens? Just bought an XH2S and want to shoot kino. Preferably under $600 and I only really shoot like somewhere between 16-24mm or something. Thanks a lot
Anonymous
>>4477506 Lenses do cause grain and other effects. You are just objectively wrong.
>need a high bitrate to color grade Do you need high bitrate to color grade. Have you ever traded color grading shitty footage? It's impossible. It looks bad no matter what you do.
>I only shoot video so bought a foolji XH2S is superior to Panasonic/Sony/BMPCC and any of other cameras in the price range.
>>4477497 Nikon mount is better than Canon mount
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477822 >XH2S is superior to Panasonic/Sony/BMPCC and any of other cameras in the price range. Mmh, I don't particularly agree, sure, it's way better than any Sony, but Panasonic has way better menus and the BMPCC shoots objectively better footage if you got like $2000 extra to rig it up.
No fault towards the X-H2S video though, it would be genuinely one of the best pro bodies you could buy if they actually fixed the autofocus. Shame.
cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE
>>4477822 >Lenses do cause grain and other effects. quadrupling down on the b8 huh
Anonymous
>>4477878 Have you heard of vignetting, soft focus, noise, chromatic aberration?
cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE
Quoted By:
>>4477883 That's not grain. Have you heard of tabular and T?
Anonymous
Where can I learn about optics and optical science? I want to know more about cameras to the point I could know everything about a camera’s settings without looking at metadata. I want to know if I can work out a camera’s settings or lens just by looking at a photograph and analysing it. For instance, can you work out the shutter speed or aperture through deduction if you already know the ISO or focal length or distance to subject or depth of field? My question is about the exposure triangle and knowing whether one element in a camera’s setting can give you clues to the other elements. Surely there have been forensics used on this level, in some sort of criminal case. Or do they usually only look for manufacturing clues for the camera’s build and make?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477601 >For instance, can you work out the shutter speed or aperture through deduction if you already know the ISO or focal length or distance to subject or depth of field? My question is about the exposure triangle and knowing whether one element in a camera’s setting can give you clues to the other elements. Yes. There are tons of exposure calculators. Google EV DOF calculator to mess around with them. Knowing the time and place can help you figure out the general light level (EV) which gives you an idea of typical exposures. Perspective helps find focal length e.g. a landscape with compressed features is more telephoto unless it was a crop. Noise levels helps find ISO unless they used a denoiser. Motion blur helps find shutter speed. Depth of field will tell you aperture assuming you know subject distance and it's not a crop or stitch. Dynamic range can help you find out sensor size and color science can help you identify the manufacturer. Without EXIF, just the resolution gives big clues. Chromatic aberration, vignetting, field curvature, bokeh are useful for figuring out the lens e.g. apochromatic, apodization, the swirly bokeh Helios etc.
For optics in general, there are some good tutorials out there. There's a good beginner series by the guy behind the Google Pixel phones on Youtube. 1001 lens nights by Nikon is fun read about the development of their lenses historically and the Zeiss Lenspire site has PDFs from engineers that are great resources for design. If you know a photo was an ultrawide for instance you probably guess it is more recent since those weren't common in the past for example. At some point you'll want to learn about MTF and the articles on Lensrental are good for that. Roger Clark also had a good website on optics. Canon had a lens brochure that was informative. Brandon Dube (sp?) is an optical engineer who comments on Lensrentals and some other photo sites so if you find his profile on Disqus you could probably engage with him.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477608 >Eggers >Visual legacy I like his work but we are in a pretty poor shape in terms of cinema if his visual style is considered legacy
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477601 When I was in college, the head of our photo dept who was only in his late 30s could look at a printed photo and reliably critique your camera settings, lighting scheme, and printer in a single glance. It was pretty amazing until I realized just how many images he'd been looking at for how many years. Did it in the Marines before he was a professor and QC'd hundreds of thousands of images for them as well.
Occasionally a student would have some print shop run prints (still on a nice commercial printer, but not a fine art giclee printer) to make a deadline and he'd just take one look at it, tilt his head, see the colors at the borders, and you knew you were fucked, getting a 0 on that one. No one ever got anything past that guy. And he got that skill level in just over a decade. So, it's possibru OP