/p/ - Photography

103KiB, 828x383, IMG_9373.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 15 May 2024 07:24:37 No.4313918 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

Hahaha, Jesus fucking Christ, what the fuck

6 posts and 5 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1714702111909270.png, 252KiB, 302x324

Anonymous Wed 15 May 2024 10:15:41 No.4313948 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313943
last one i can find for now. seems like snoys are getting adopted quite rapidly

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1693484482973723.png, 483KiB, 935x568

Anonymous Wed 15 May 2024 10:20:29 No.4313949 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313943
I'm actually quite surprised at how distinctive those snoy superteles are even at that distance. the big G badge and single solid black focus ring are a dead giveaway.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1685093611643436.png, 169KiB, 266x251

Anonymous Wed 15 May 2024 10:22:33 No.4313950 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313943
these two are probably snoys too. top is likely the 200-600

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1705836740885433.png, 215KiB, 403x203

Anonymous Wed 15 May 2024 10:23:59 No.4313953 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313943
one more

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1694868838625713.png, 398KiB, 667x888

Anonymous Wed 15 May 2024 10:30:54 No.4313954 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313943
and of course 1/3 of those are black, so nikon. broadcast cameras mostly sony too. you also misread my original quote since I said "Sony sensors" and went into an autistic rage about Canon vs Sony cameras. Every other camera maker caved realizing Sony made better sensors except Canon obviously and they're basically forced to bake in NR to be somewhat competitive.

1MiB, 1080x710, 1712551000848.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

street photography

Anonymous Mon 08 Apr 2024 04:37:14 No.4302214 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

how do i get more photos of people doing things like this?

15 posts and 1 image omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 May 2024 19:24:46 No.4309819 Report

Quoted By: >>4309848

>>4309809
But the street is where the thieves are

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 May 2024 20:55:22 No.4309848 Report

Quoted By:

>>4309819
Go to another street

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 07 May 2024 16:58:42 No.4311361 Report

Quoted By: >>4311510

>>4309804
use a strap don't be a pussy and don't look like a bitch

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 May 2024 00:22:31 No.4311510 Report

Quoted By: >>4313951

>>4311361
Black people will fight anyone, regardless of if they look like a bitch.
Straps don't matter, they'll just sucker punch you while you're trying to compose a shot.

>>4309804
Gun

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 May 2024 10:22:49 No.4313951 Report

Quoted By:

>>4311510
you carry too much fear to be doing anything with street photography. it's all communicated subconsciously when you approach someone. people will think you're a dickhead.

161KiB, 1280x720, used-camera-box-eyexplore.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Used Cameras Shop

Anonymous Sat 16 Mar 2024 00:29:55 No.4295219 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

been thinking for awhile about maybe opening up my own Used Cameras Shop but not entirely sure where to start or what I need to do in order to get it off the ground and not just be an idea but a plan I can get into action with

42 posts omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Apr 2024 16:12:49 No.4308048 Report

Quoted By:

up

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 07 May 2024 20:55:55 No.4311466 Report

Quoted By:

I live in one of the biggest urban sprawls in this country and there's not even a NEW camera shop that has a large selection within 35 miles of me. There's one closer but they don't have a ton of stuff. I'm not sure that's really a good business move. Refurbishing broken shit and selling at a profit is probably a better business

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 07 May 2024 22:41:06 No.4311480 Report

Quoted By: >>4311498

Nice idea, I wish I had one locally desu. How will you compete with international used marketplaces like MPB for example?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 07 May 2024 23:57:30 No.4311498 Report

Quoted By:

>>4311480
Not him but I imagine the only way a shop like this will survive in current day is to offer socialization, like meeting, workshops, competitions ect. It's the only thing that the internet can't do

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 May 2024 09:28:11 No.4313935 Report

Quoted By:

>>4297683
desu yeah. Nobody wants to spend money on old outdated technology. I have a camera i got as a graduation present literally ten years ago and i only used it a couple times. Sad, but, my iphone is probably better now. I do like the pictures it took but idk why i would lug around a big huge camera when I already have my phone. I do like my polaroid but i dont have friends so i never use it lmao

5MiB, 3145x1949, 001.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

some of this year's photos so far

Anonymous Mon 13 May 2024 00:13:19 No.4313146 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

I've selected a couple of photos from this year to share and get some criticism if you guys will
The sequence is not chronological but rather loosely based on themes, whether of subjects or medium experimentations
Anyway, here it is

32 posts and 19 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 22:28:55 No.4313787 Report

Quoted By: >>4313789

>>4313776
oh my, if I were to know how deeply displeased and unsatisfied that random person would be I would never have even taken the lens cap off in the first place, much less would have I taken those photographs

no but seriously, I shoot what catches my attention
so, in short, I shoot what I find interesting, and not what is 'beautiful' or whatever
and those interesting things can be aesthetically pleasing as well, and it's on me as a photographer to portray stuff in a certain light (and it can be pretty or it can be repulsive or whatever)
The dent in the truck photos in the beginning of the thread, for example. It's a dent, it's not pretty, but it makes that truck different from the other ones, and in the context of the photograph I believe I managed to approach it in an aesthetically pleasing way: it has texture, an organic shape that at the same time is conflicting with the sense of 'indestructibility' of a gigantic truck like this one, and also complements its brute aspect

>>4313742
Only shooting conventionally pretty things to me is the equivalent to being a picky eater: it's childish, as if you didn't develop a proper palate, a proper sense of taste
Shooting cats and flowers and little cottages at the hillside can be nice, but only being able to appreciate that is kinda like those kids who only eat candy, cereals and random shit with copious amounts of corn syrup

Photography is not meant to be always pretty, it's a medium to express yourself
You can choose to express a wide range of emotions and impressions, or you can have a narrow and shallow approach of only showing beauty, which is not what I'm aiming for in the first place

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 22:33:00 No.4313789 Report

Quoted By: >>4313792

>>4313787
>no but seriously, I shoot what catches my attention
Well you must have ADHD
>Photography is not meant to be always pretty, it's a medium to express yourself
Well express yourself man, but I am not seeing any intent with most of these. There is no composition, no playing with light and shadows, they are just photos of buildings probably taken at mid day.

Funnily enough the only interesting photo is your self portrait
>>4313173
Because you did played with the light and tried some perspective.

You wanted to be a /p/oster taking photos of building corners but unironically you might be better at taking portraits.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO [0] Ektar 100 - 120_med.jpg, 5MiB, 3000x4500

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 22:46:24 No.4313792 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313789
>You wanted to be a /p/oster taking photos of building corners but unironically you might be better at taking portraits.
kek I can live with that

>no but seriously, I shoot what catches my attention
>Well you must have ADHD
I like shooting urban scenes and its transformations, and its workers
hence why there are so many photos of trucks and machines and people working and the restoration of the museum etc.

>There is no composition
>no playing with light and shadows
I truly don't take criticism personally, I believe it's great for improving, but would you elaborate on that please?
because I'm honestly searching for some in-depth criticism so that I can think about it (and either incorporate that to my work or not, but at least think about it so that I make more conscious decisions in the future)
But just saying "oh it's bad", "you didn't shoot pretty things" is null
>picrel: pretty things

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 23:03:40 No.4313801 Report

Quoted By: >>4313853

>>4313712
By unfocused I mean that they're lacking a clear subject. I didn't even notice the couple to be honest.
Try playing around with light in a scene to pull the viewers attention. In general we pay attention to the lightest parts of an image first. If you place your subject there, the viewer will naturally understand the context of what you're trying to show them.

This is tough to do in wide shots, mostly because wide shots are just tougher to get right. The wider the shot the more other things are in the image to distract your viewer.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 May 2024 01:25:29 No.4313853 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313801
thanks for the feedback
yeah, sometimes in wide shots it's tough to direct the viewer not only because there may be many things going on at once, but also because we have much less control over light
The most I can do for some subjects is select the time of the day (and the season etc.) that I go to shoot it
If I can't control light, I'll pay more attention to "control the light" in terms of the way I frame it

70KiB, 822x666, M42(2).jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

/astro/ - Astrophotography General

Anonymous Thu 11 Jan 2024 14:09:39 No.4272333 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By: >>4313425

Old thread
>>4209257

324 posts and 109 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 020A3918.jpg, 1MiB, 1280x1920

Anonymous Sun 12 May 2024 06:47:15 No.4312939 Report

Quoted By:

Any aurora photos?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_3455.jpg, 388KiB, 2796x1290

Anonymous Mon 13 May 2024 06:20:01 No.4313248 Report

Quoted By:

Finally getting some shots in

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_3527.jpg, 5MiB, 5184x3456

Anonymous Mon 13 May 2024 22:14:27 No.4313425 Report

Quoted By: >>4313467

>>4272333
Canon T5 Rebel
8 second
F/45
6400 ISO
Auto white balance

Extremely amateur photographer here. I took some pictures of the night sky and I see blue and red stars. I was just messing around with the settings to see what I could see. I understand a high ISO is asking for noise, but as far as I understand the coloured stars aren't noise at least? What would cause them to be coloured? At first I thought I was capturing Doppler shift but is that possible with such a simple camera? I can't really find anything online asking the same exact question I am.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 00:39:51 No.4313467 Report

Quoted By: >>4313802

>>4313425
Your Camera is fucked.

Those are dead pixels/ noise...not even stars.

Middle point is most likely a Planet.

Also, for astro you absolutely need to use raw.

also, 500 rule... base iso (which for your camera is probably somewhere between 200-400, long exposure noise comp. off.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 23:05:55 No.4313802 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313467
Thank you, yeah it's noise. Just took one with the lens cap on and with low ISO it's fine but with 6400 the dots come back up.

1MiB, 1500x1009, L1054617.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Film AND Digital

fe2fucker Sun 05 May 2024 00:32:03 No.4310293 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By: >>4313724

No bait this time, lets just enjoy the different qualities of the two mediums together.

80 posts and 65 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 19:16:49 No.4313724 Report

Quoted By: >>4313730

>>4310293
What film were you using? I quite like the look of it.

fe2fucker

fe2fucker Tue 14 May 2024 19:29:29 No.4313730 Report

Quoted By: >>4313737

>>4313724
gold 200 developed in the cs41 kit accordingly to standard instructions, scanned on a Nikon Coolscan LS2000 and Vuescan, inverted in lightroom with negative lab pro

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 19:41:27 No.4313734 Report

Quoted By: >>4313736

Other than some troll setting very yellow auto WB on the leica they rook arike

fe2fucker

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO dis green nuff.jpg, 4MiB, 3662x2634

fe2fucker Tue 14 May 2024 19:47:33 No.4313736 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313734
nah its just me not having an ir cut filter yet, the m8 likes to make fabrics purple and foliage yellow

here, i made an edit just for you, didn't touch the white balance at all, just hue-shifted the yellows into green

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 19:50:06 No.4313737 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313730
Thanks. I might try to bulk buy some gold when I get back into shooting 35mm. Seems like an acceptable quality alternative to portra without the assrape price.

435KiB, 2396x1797, 2133x1600x2.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

pinhole cameras

Anonymous Sun 12 May 2024 23:13:00 No.4313143 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

I've been trying to get into pinhole cameras lately. Does any anon here ever practiced solargraphy? Need some tips and tricks.

4 posts and 3 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO solarografia_2.jpg, 152KiB, 1280x659

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 16:46:20 No.4313690 Report

Quoted By: >>4313704

>>4313685
Here's the one taken with the left one.

Pictures were digitized with a regular DSLR with two lights pointing the photo paper in a 45 degree angle. Exposure checked with a gray paper beforehand.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 17:31:10 No.4313704 Report

Quoted By: >>4313705

>>4313347
>>4313690
How long did you expose these for? Judging by the sun rings I'd guess around 3-4 weeks, right? Also, did you develop them or just scanned them as they are?

>>4313334
I wonder where did those white marks come from

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 17:43:26 No.4313705 Report

Quoted By: >>4313721

>>4313704
About three weeks is correct, since the exposing time was tied to the duration of the course. I scanned them as they were, no need to develop solarographs.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image.jpg, 264KiB, 2048x1756

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 18:45:37 No.4313721 Report

Quoted By: >>4313722

>>4313705
I know some people do develop solargraphs but if I recall correctly that's if you just use one of those semi-diy pinhole boxes for 20-30 seconds of exposure.

Zach

Zach Tue 14 May 2024 18:54:37 No.4313722 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313721
Film photography is chemistry

2MiB, 3888x2608, IMGP1864-2.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

/rpt/ - Recent Photo Thread

Anonymous Tue 23 Apr 2024 13:08:07 No.4306900 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

mind-bending colour toning edition
Previously: >>4304692

229 posts and 151 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 13:43:43 No.4313644 Report

Quoted By:

>>4310824
very cool and well-framed photo anon. I like that every side of the house is captured with something around it (grass, trees or sky) to frame it. you could warm up the white balance a little though to remove the banding around the edges of the tree and the roofline. yeah, I had another look. the white balance is definitely too cold. oh yeah, I also remembered that you should have moved left (maintaining the same distance from the house) to simultaneously elongate the horizontal dimensions of the house and remove the awkward bit of road in the bottom right. still though, you’ve done well to identify this composition anon. well done.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 13:49:22 No.4313645 Report

Quoted By: >>4313648 >>4313649

>>4308074
without a word of advice
you should be ashamed of yourself anon.
>inb4 your advice is shit
>inb4 kill yourself
>after <<don’t you have your own website ken?>>
I’m trying something out of the ordinary. if you believe ken’s style (which I’ve never viewed in detail) is so beneath you, do something better than him or shut up. one picture is worth a thousand words (and I have to reiterate this on /p/, the photography board of all places).

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 14:02:54 No.4313648 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313645
>cryingbaby.jpg

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 14:17:55 No.4313649 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313645
Never posting here again was your advice.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 16:28:33 No.4313677 Report

Quoted By:

>>4310657
Don't feed dogs with edibles anon.

694KiB, 5472x3648, Studio Session-2141.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

budget photography

Anonymous Fri 10 May 2024 18:29:05 No.4312513 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

Hello, I want to start taking pictures but I only have +-200$.
Interested mostly in photography, but it would be nice if it could still shoot video not bad as an add-on

I've seen some videos on YouTube where the GH2 (hacked) showed pretty good quality, is it worth getting it or are there any better choices? What would you recommend for a beginner?

Thanks in advance

41 posts and 2 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 03:06:04 No.4313502 Report

Quoted By:

>>4312912
Judging by the replies he was wrong and got btfo hard.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO GALAXY-S4-zoom-8.jpg, 78KiB, 872x586

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 03:18:49 No.4313505 Report

Quoted By: >>4313536

>>4313500

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Yongnuo-YN455-Micro-Four-Thirds- (...).jpg, 78KiB, 651x442

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 03:22:01 No.4313506 Report

Quoted By: >>4313536

>>4313500
or what about real camera with phone? (even has built-in selfie camera)

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 05:32:37 No.4313536 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313505
Kinda cool
>>4313506
That means I always have to carry my camera

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 08:51:31 No.4313596 Report

Quoted By:

>>4312554
>commodified hobbies
I think I've seen that in a Youtube video essay

34KiB, 648x455, CanonRumorsDead.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

CanonRumors is dead!

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 01:29:21 No.4313479 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4313528 >>4313560

And at the eve of the R5 MkII, when their traffic would be the absolute highest!

Where am I supposed to get my baseless speculation and clickbait now?

1 post omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 05:03:58 No.4313528 Report

Quoted By: >>4313529

>>4313479
based good riddance
canon is the walmart camera

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 05:05:45 No.4313529 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313528
your mom is the walmart woman

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 06:40:57 No.4313559 Report

Quoted By:

canon sent a hitman to cover up allegations of the r1 being delayed yet again

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 06:41:49 No.4313560 Report

Quoted By:

>>4313479
She probably worked for boeing

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 May 2024 07:06:11 No.4313572 Report

Quoted By:

My only sadness is that it makes it harder to know when preorders will open. The R5 II will likely be sold out for months, so preordering immediately is a must.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Threads by latest replies - Page 21

On these archives

Your latest searches

street photography

Used Cameras Shop

some of this year's photos so far

/astro/ - Astrophotography General

Film AND Digital

pinhole cameras

/rpt/ - Recent Photo Thread

budget photography

CanonRumors is dead!