Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
Threads by latest replies - Page 13
Anonymous
These faggots should be strictly restricted to class F airspace, with well defined dimension and NEVER EVER LEFT OUT, sick and tired of avoiding them. Yesterday while flying a personal Cessna 310 from a buddy of mine and 3 weeks ago on the Dash 8 with the small airliner I fly for. >23 year old co pilot
Anonymous
Quoted By:
planefag here, paragliders are based as hell i wanna buy a cheap kit biplane with an open cockpit someday for light aerobatics and i think wing walking is exceedingly based, theres a guy who gives lessons and lets you do it in the span of a single day and its not that gay shit where you're strapped on top of the plane for the whole flight, you get out of the cockpit yourself and climb on the wings
Anonymous
>>1948669 I love hot air balloons because it's objectively the most hilariously retarded mode of transport.
BaconRider !yuA7eZE8l2
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1964619 >>1954415 >>1954381 I'd take it with a grain of salt. They almost certainly just let the invasion happen as proven by massive shorting on the stock market just days before, so it's not that paragliders were somehow tactically advantageous and made a difference.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2004292 It was the first flying machine, respect your elders zoomzoom
Anonymous
I need to buy a nipple ring for my bicycle. Is there a standard size or are they all different like hangers?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1997166 If they're hard to turn at all (most wheels), make sure you put a drop of oil on each spoke.
singer oil (sewing machine) is appropriate and comes with a nice little nozzle.
Also if they're bladed spokes make sure you hold the spokes while you turn the nipple.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Subway Police should be allowed to perform wanton brutality on fare evaders, you know, all the people causing the problems in the world's subways. The bums, the drug users/addicts, the smokers, the showtimers, the loud rap music players, the criminals. Riders report these pieces of shit causing the problems, police come in, ask for fare, when they don't have it, the police tase them, beat the shit out of them, physically throw them out of the station, then burn all their homeless belongings. Wanton arrests of all these "people' and throw them in jail without a trial. If fare evaders were eliminated subways would be great places. Why are they afraid to do it? Who gives a fuck that homeless drug addicts are having their civil rights violated? Who gives a fuck that antisocial people with no regard for the comfort of others are getting their civil rights violated?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2002613 >I can't have sex so nobody should >t. sexless virgin I pity you
Anonymous
Quoted By:
la metro now enforcing fares
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1999071 >>huh??? the streets are full of crazy people running around off their meds? WHY WOULD LIBERALS DO THIS!?!?!??! This is because they closed all the asylums in the mid-70's. That's where the criminally insane used to be put.
>>1999070 >Beating them up and burning their stuff isn't really gonna affect anything except make them more unhinged and obnoxious to be around. The vast majority of fare dodgers aren't psychotic. Not every bad person is a bad person because they're insane, some people are just cretins who need to be hit really, really hard immediately after performing the behaviors you want to discourage.
>Psychotic people don't understand consequences so you can't really threaten them into changing their behavior. Yeah, you can. Even people in a bout of genuine psychosis respond to force. And I say "genuine" because the reality is we have multiple generations of adult toddlers for whom public shame has never existed.
On-the-spot corporal punishment is the only kind of threat that the people who need it understand. You could threaten 1 year in jail for fare dodging, but that wouldn't dissuade the people who fare dodge more than a 30-second caning.
Anonymous
>>1999182 Then why bother with fares? It’s just an expensive infrastructure to maintain with almost zero money saved to the government. It would be far more efficient to just remove the barriers at stations cause so many people just can’t be bothered with doing the steps needed to go on public transportation. Yes it would reduce the ability of the state to do its job (a welfare state by definition needs to be a surveillance state in part to know what welfare means in the context of the country, so harvesting data such as public transport ridership can help in determining budgets) but ridership would definitely increase. Us humans are incredibly lazy, you’d be surprised how many people miss out on welfare and benefits simply because they don’t want to fill out a bit of paperwork or procrastinate on it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2008937 Easier to drag someone off for fare evasion than to try to argue some arcane rule in court about "vagrancy" that's going to be in years of dragged out court battles over some constitutional nonsense, though that may be less relevant if the entire country is placed under martial law which seems increasingly likely
Anonymous
how much will i get discriminated for being italian in the midwest though
Anonymous
I sometimes wonder what life is like whilst sailing in the Arctic like in Northern Canada.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2008529 Very few do that so godd luck getting reports here.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2008529 probably quite cold
Anonymous
Anonymous
>The Drive American Act seeks to gut the Biden administration’s electric vehicle tax rebate program, with the first half of the bill undoing the program altogether. In the latter half of the bill, Vance proposes that American taxpayers follow him into a ridiculously circular logic that would instead place up to a $7,500 rebate on all new gasoline- and diesel-powered cars, trucks, and SUVs. Vehicles with larger payloads and more seats would be eligible for more of the incentive. In order to take advantage of this, you’d need to live in a household making less than $300,000, and the vehicle could not exceed $80,000. Both “limits” are well north of average. Daily reminder that right wing Americans are genetic trash and any /n/ arguments made by them are purely out of rubbing their nutsack over the corpse of America.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Gonna use a 6 axle dump truck as my daily driver.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2008845 >seething poor bunkertroon The privately owned combustion engine automobile has won.
Truly the superior mode of transportation.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>live in climate that heavily disadvantages electric vehicles >will now be treated as an equal citizen Feels fucking good,man
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2008845 FFS they may as well just say they'll mandate that all cars are steam-driven and run directly from burning coal, and the EV owners be rounded up and shot.
Fucking braindead fascist pigs. I'd like to see them all rounded up and shot in the head.
Anonymous
Are there any examples of 21st century steam locomotives? Not preserved historical steam engines made in the 19/20th century but original 21st century steam engines. It doesn't matter if it's standard gauge or minimum gauge.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2005168 Seing a website address on a steam engine triggers anachronism.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2005166 >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LNER_Peppercorn_Class_A1_60163_Tornado >completed in 2008 https://youtu.be/-8fp8Gknm0w >the first steam locomotive to officially reach 100 mph (160 km/h) on British tracks in over 50 years Anonymous
>>2005832 Takes lots of heat to warm up that much water. Hotter fire warms it up faster. Gotta have high pressure to work efficiently.
A low temp/pressure might be feasible in smaller scales
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2005855 Propane has more heating value per pound than coal or oil but less per cubic foot, plus it needs to be stored under pressure.
>>2005832 >>2008706 Any fuel can burn hot enough. Flame temperature doesn't really matter unless you're using a radiant superheater, and I don't believe any locomotive boiler uses them (but I could be wrong). The problem in any boiler is getting steady combustion of the correct amount of fuel to keep up with steam production.
Anonymous
Anonymous
I'd rather have a rack or basket than panniers. I think panniers are gay and stupid. Discuss.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2006559 >men >bike purse kek
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2005879 Seconded.
>>2005880 Not true. I use panniers and I'm a weird middle aged man but I never do bike tours.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Reformed pannier fag here. I used panniers daily for half a decade. Towards the end I started jerry rigging my setup more and more. Never really liked the panniers for countless reasons. Installed >picrel bad boys. Sadly I did not have alot of miles for testing due to an injury sustained soon after. But from the few k km I did I can say with certainty to be reformed.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2005875 panniers are for ppl who think baskets and milk crates are gay and stupid. this is the world, particularly now, in a nutshell.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
bob trailer master race laffing at u cargolets
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Be riding electric bicycle around town >See firemen standing next to a van >Me - "Excuse me, which fire extinguisher do you recommend if this thing were to catch fire?" >Fireman - "Run"
Anonymous
>>2008750 >>2008757 This, plus /n/orimono, Japanese for "ride thing."
Anonymous
>>2008766 But why Japanese specifically? Why not Dutch /r/ijden, Tagalog /s/umakay, Chinese /c/héngzuò, or hell, why not Halkomelem /l/épets.
Is it weebs?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2008770 >Is it weebs? Obviously. This is primarly a japanese prawn breeding forum after all.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2008770 because 4chan started as moot's anime buddies and /a/ was the first board.
weebs are literally baked into everything here
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2008770 >Is it weebs? Unironically, it is, realize 4ch has its founding roots based on /a/nime (the first board) and Japanese culture anything else was /b/ ("random"). This is oldfag lore we're talking now
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2003628 Imagine if we donated this to the US Navy. They have such a fuckoff huge budget they could probably convert it into an aircraft carrier if they wanted
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2004622 >foreign military aid is a charity given by bleeding heart liberals My goodness how times have changed, back in my day we bitched about the US trying to stick its fingers in everything for its own (implied to be morally questionable) advantage
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2003628 Break it down, melt the parts and build a new ship.