Quoted By:
What the fuck is wrong with these mongoloid slackers? They completely underschedule longhaul trains everywhere outside the NEC so almost no one can use them for shorter trips and then wonder why ridership is in the shitter. Each route should be minimum 3x a day per direction.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2052493 if it's long-distance you're not getting wifi anyway
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2052493 No, but I make sure to bring a bottle of bourbon with me personally to help pass the time.
You're allowed to drink in bedrooms/roomettes as long as you don't disturb anyone.
Anonymous
I have to say this is pretty much the GOAT way to travel. And yes there is wifi
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2043515 >rail priority News about some of that:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/norfolk-southern-agrees-give-amtrak-trains-highest-priority-over-freight-trains-and-make-its Norfolk Southern will give Amtrak the highest priority on the Crescent route.
Now we just need this on every route.
one (1) fucking accident and they were gone, I don't get it
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2040378 >no (0) fucking accidents and they were gone, I don't get it >international passenger scamjet .jpeg Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2052812 It's pretty amazing how profitable an airline service can be when the manufacturer sells an aircraft for £1 each and the government swallows all of the R&D costs
Anonymous
>>2048526 Especially since passengers tend to care more about fares and comfort nowadays than speed.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2052969 I mean I care about both, I'll pay 30% more for a slightly more comfortable seat, I'll pay 50% more for a nonstop flight, but there are limits. I'm not paying 10000% more to save 3 hours
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2040378 Should have made a military version. The ability to transport elite troops and light equipment at supersonic speeds could be very useful for certain shock operations. It would need to be altered for paratroopers.
Why did hydrofoils never take off?
Anonymous
>>2047789 >Blocks your path Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2053304 I’ve actually been on one of those. It was incredible and much smoother than I was imagining. Smoother than the usual boat ferries you get today
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2053192 Agreed. An SRN4 would not pitch up more than if it hit a bug though.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2044074 I took the JR Beetle hydrofoil from Busan to Fukuoka and it was a pretty good experience. Apparently they replaced it with a slightly slower but larger trimaran now.
what bike do i buy with $2000?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Get a Kona Rove
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2053370 use the /bqg/, dork
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Used swerks sl6
Anonymous
Quoted By:
90s mtb and rice it out
Anonymous
Quoted By:
cmon you fags, give me serious answers.
THIS is why public transit systems are never going to work in the west. Who wants to roll the dice for life vs death in order to save the environment? It only works in homogenous high trust high IQ societies.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2053425 The other 5 threads weren't enough?
Anonymous
>>2053425 >It only works in homogenous high trust high IQ societies. Like Japan? But you get gropped there by Incels all the time if you're a woman.
Separated wagons in high trust societies would be the best thing to do.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2053425 It's the elephant in the room that you can be jailed for noticing. But sadly true.
Sadly you just can't have safe clean public transportation when third worlders are involved. We know this because we had safe clean transportation in Europe right up until the flood of mass immigration destroyed it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2053427 Vastly overblown problem. It happens in the West too, but it's overshadowed by the frequent beatings and murders.
Anonymous
The newest development after gravel bikes with suspension forks: Gravel bikes with suspension forks and flat bars. I simply have to have one!
Anonymous
>>2052928 What's the difference between this and hardtail XC mountain bikes?
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>2052928 >r gravel bikes with suspension forks so a mountain bike?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
you know theres poorfag coping around when fs bad because it's less efficient
>>2053090 and also because its more efficient
>>2053186
Quoted By:
infrequent poster here is there any room on this board for a city builder vidya general? there's a general on /vg/ that includes city builder games but it also includes a few other genres so city building is rarely talked about i just wanted to get the opinions of my fre/n/s on this topic pic related is cities skylines 2, btw
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2053285 What do you like about 3 more than 4
Anonymous
>>2053285 SC3k isn't much more than a prettier version of SimCity 2000, which is really obsolete at this point, zone a patch of residential, make sure it doesn't go three tiles past a road (or whatever), zone commercial and industrial not too far away, make sure to expand just enough that you can replace your power plant every 50 years in-game.
SimCity 4 has the cooler mods while not letting you cheese the simulation by just throwing all your schools and hospitals in a corner of the map until your advisors stop bitching about it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2053321 It's too bad SC5 was a bust, it had some interesting ideas (like behind able to do minor mods to buildings to increase their capacity so you don't have 10x of the same school on the map). Having every person/car precisely mapped out with things to do and places to be was its death knell, that really wasn't integral to city simming. They were getting too heavy handed with the environmental browbeating as well.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
The genre died 5evr with the death of Maxis. It's the same reason The Sims 4 was terrible and killed the franchise.
Workers and resources looks very cool but I haven't played it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSv37HwwojU Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2053285 Baloney. Simcity 4 lets you build a whole region of cities
Theoretically speaking, if I was an entrepreneuring billionaire and I wanted to bring back one of the great American passenger trains (Super Chief, California Zephyr, Panama Limited, Empire Builder, City of Los Angeles/San Francisco, 20th Century Limited, Broadway Limited, Powhatan Arrow, Coast Daylight, etc.) to run on a regular basis (let's put it at at least two times a month for a start), which option would be more feasible from an economic/technical/legal perspective? 1. Acquire all of the surviving rolling stock (sleepers, dining cars, dome/observation cars, baggage cars, etc.) from the original consist from private owners, heritage railways, and museums, as well as matching surviving locomotives (can be from ones different railroads since thousands of functionally and aesthetically identical EMD F and E units were sold to all Class I railroads). Renovate them as necessary to make them FRA-compliant, obtain waivers wherever possible. Put them into service as a part-luxury train, part-mobile museum. 2. Commission the construction of a replica consist. Building entirely new streamlined cars from scratch, designed to match the internal and external appearance of its original as much as possible, with changes only being made when it's literally required to make the car FRA-compliant/modern user friendly (updated wiring, HEP, power outlets at seats, WiFi support, replacing wooden paneling with MDF paneling etc.). Motive power consists of custom-built Siemens Chargers designed to resemble the original E and F units (streamlining, bulldog noses, matching paint schemes, etc.) as much as legally possible. 1/2
Anonymous
Quoted By:
There just aren’t enough wealthy boomer train autistes to make this feasible. There’s these luxury cruise trains in the Canadian and Colorado Rockies but their primary clientele isn’t foamers. You can take short rides on vintage equipment at rail museums, or just get drunk or high enough on Amtrak to imagine yourself in the golden age of rail travel.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2011902 >>2011903 Option 2 if you want longevity
Anonymous
>>2048155 Thank God this baby got preserved
Anonymous
>>2053389 This thread's been up for over a year and most of the replies are just you bumping your thread. Not much interest in it. Let it go
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2053390 nta but I've ghost bumped it a couple of times
Quoted By:
Dia dhaoibh I've been directed here to inquire as to why ebikes are bad. My opinion as of yet is that if I get to work safely (for me and others) without needing to take a shower, it's good. Cycle lane availability means I don't need to go near pedestrians and don't mix too much with cars. This all adds up to me pointing to that ebikes are positive, could anyone explain to me their viewpoint as to why they would be negative? I personally hate escooters as they are always ridden by knackers unstably and in dangerous manners. Go raibh míle céad maith agaibh.
Anonymous
>>2053204 >Dangerous because of CARS Anonymous
>>2053204 Actual bikes and ebikes share the same roads here (except when the ebikes are on the sidewalk) and the ebike fatalities outnumber regular bikes by a roughly 14:1 ratio. And it's not because there are 14x as many ebikes.
You actually nailed it earlier when you said it "takes no skill to ride an ebike (at 25mph)" but you were trying to make a totally different point at the time. But you actually got it. So let's just meditate on that for a moment. It takes no skill to go 25mph, and 14x as many people are dying. I wonder if you can figure the rest out.
Anonymous
>>2053277 I think youre thinking of another anon, that wasnt me talking about skill. Who cares.
Also, you think I give a shit if people kill themselves on ebikes? I care 0. You should care 0. Let freedom ring baby. like this shit is just funny as fuck and I ride a regular bike exclusively:
>>2053269 Bikes don't kill people, deal with it. There's no reason to hate them. And if they remove idiots from the world, then that is FANTASTIC. You think this world needs more people? Fuck, buy em some cigarettes, get em hooked.
Maybe run a PSA to help people realize how dumb they are, but really fuck em.
Anyways, the real reason people hate ebikes is because they slow cars down and make pedestrians worry sometimes but essentially do no harm. But cars kill people which is way worse by a huge margin. banning, or regulating ebikes away is asinine shit. If you wanna stomp on the poor, raise rent prices to keep em from fucking and making more shitty kids. Dont go after affordable transportation.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2053350 Because it's not just people killing themselves, that's just the one measurable outcome. For every 1 ebiker who removes himself from the gene pool there's about 9000 incidents of ebikes hitting people or causing crashes that cause property damage
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>2053350 >Bikes don't kill people, deal with it. There's no reason to hate them. And if they remove idiots from the world, then that is FANTASTIC. You think this world needs more people? I agree, bikes only kill cyclists which is guaranteed to be a net positive for everyone else.