Quoted By: >>4486605
Should wild subjects have privacy?
Laughing gull edition
Last thread >>4467818
Threads by latest replies - Page 15
Quoted By:
was this image taken on film or digital? https://files.catbox.moe/9jjcnu.jpg
Quoted By:
what is going to be your next hobby now that no one cares about good photos on any platform at all?
Quoted By: >>4489792
>it now cost $20 to develop film only with no prints or scans
AHHHHHHHHH
AHHHHHHHHH
295KiB, 1000x560, 1000_F_932370754_yvL01hoATRXD5AqTdLv7XRPEbzvVRJLh-759825151.jpg
Quoted By: >>4489728
How do you do it?
I've been getting more active with my photography for a few years now and it's starting to get messy.
On my hard drive I have my pictures in different folder by year and month, so it's quick and easy to just clear out my SD card.
Then in Lightroom I pick the images I like and want to use and put them in a collection. However usually I make one collection per "set" and very rarely group any of the collections. Only have a group for shooting at protests, one for portraits and a few for some multi-week trips I took that resulted in multiple photo-sets.
In my context a set is just a collection of images with a similar theme or from the same day that I post on social media or send to friends or whatever.
Having an ever growing list of collections seems like a problem waiting to happen, especially if I want to go pro one day, so I was wondering how you guys manage it? The only thing I've seen online that might be a good idea is maybe grouping my collections by location to make them a little easier to sort through when I end up visiting the same place multiple times.
I've been getting more active with my photography for a few years now and it's starting to get messy.
On my hard drive I have my pictures in different folder by year and month, so it's quick and easy to just clear out my SD card.
Then in Lightroom I pick the images I like and want to use and put them in a collection. However usually I make one collection per "set" and very rarely group any of the collections. Only have a group for shooting at protests, one for portraits and a few for some multi-week trips I took that resulted in multiple photo-sets.
In my context a set is just a collection of images with a similar theme or from the same day that I post on social media or send to friends or whatever.
Having an ever growing list of collections seems like a problem waiting to happen, especially if I want to go pro one day, so I was wondering how you guys manage it? The only thing I've seen online that might be a good idea is maybe grouping my collections by location to make them a little easier to sort through when I end up visiting the same place multiple times.
Been years since I posted here, photo dump.
Quoted By:
Give it straight to me, /p/.
Are Leica M cameras a meme? Or are they worth it?
Mainly for portraits, and rock and leaves.
Are Leica M cameras a meme? Or are they worth it?
Mainly for portraits, and rock and leaves.
Quoted By: >>4488945
I shoot black and whit 'art' photos.
I print a lot. So i spend a lot of time looking at the details of each photo. especially if they're hanging on my wall.
that being said, i have a conundrum which, surprisingly, isn't well covered on the internet:
>would you say a leica monochrom, or a medium format (with more bits and more sensor real estate) would produce better black and white images?
I print a lot. So i spend a lot of time looking at the details of each photo. especially if they're hanging on my wall.
that being said, i have a conundrum which, surprisingly, isn't well covered on the internet:
>would you say a leica monochrom, or a medium format (with more bits and more sensor real estate) would produce better black and white images?
!!fHCyNHgc7RT
Quoted By: >>4489554
>shot using smartphone
C&C plox
C&C plox
