Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 15

Underexposing to protect highlights

No.4481100 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
As a relative noob to photography, I'm afraid I may have made an early overcorrection. There's a style I'd like to learn to shoot (picrel), and what I've basically gathered is that in order to preserve the details of shop signs and neon lights in dark environments, you can underexpose your images by 1-2 stops to protect the highlights, and then you pull up the shadows in post.

I was amazed by how much detail was hiding in the shadows when I tried it, despite my photos seeming unusably dark in preview. But now I've gotten into the habit of basically underexposing EVERYTHING regardless of light situations, and I can't help but feel like I'm leaning too much on post-processing. Barring stylistic choices and just focusing on getting photos to be as 'correct' as possible, should daytime photos generally look serviceably decent right out of the camera, or is it typical to preserve highlights to the point of being dark? Is there a typical amount of information loss that's tolerated in standard photography, or is the goal to only allow the sun to be pure white?
11 posts and 7 images omitted

No.4473689 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
any fellow third world photography aficionados? how do you deal with the fear of your gear getting stolen? what kind of precautions do you take?
20 posts and 1 image omitted

/gear/

No.4473842 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
ASMR edition

Last: >>4472265
336 posts and 58 images omitted

The camera of our time

No.4464164 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Own and have used them all - Sony, Canon, Leica, Fuji. Nothing compares to this little guy. Has reignited my passion to shoot and is now always in my back pocket. Any other shooters feel the same?
313 posts and 68 images omitted

No.4480026 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
What events/activities/resources do you use to find good subject matter? I don't want to hire models because that's pervy, but I want to take better photos of people. Pic not related
8 posts omitted

Online portfolio

No.4463791 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Where do (you) host your /p/ortfolio?
26 posts omitted

Canon r6 mark 3

No.4477191 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Currently have the Canon 90D and am searching for an upgrade. Goal was... to purchase the Canon r5, but hearing that the r6 mark 3 will be announced this autumn and for the same price of 2500, I'm not so sure anymore. I love the 90D but I need something for low light photography when doing landscape up north. Also I would like something fast for night rally sessions (CER 2025 was planned at awful times when the sun was gone). Dont like ISO below 400 on my 90D and had to cheat using video mode at 4k and frame grabbing.

What have you heard about the r6 mark 3? Would you pick it over the r5? I really want to get into full frame using my old lenses. Hopefully it's going to be too much of a change.
19 posts omitted

No.4476309 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
photos of my cat Rupert that i took on my phone which at least trace amounts of thoughtful composition, as per the board rules


I like this shot because it really focuses on his face, which is cute
57 posts and 25 images omitted

Books / Resources

No.4479680 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Post books about photography that you have enjoyed. This could mean but is not limited to:
>Photo books
>Guide books
>Repair manuals
>Camera history books

I will post what I have, if you want a .pdf of any of these I'm happy to put them up on catbox. I would love to hear what you all have been reading.
20 posts and 11 images omitted