Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 13

Nikon FG rating

No.4338290 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Rate my Nikon FG that’s fully loaded with the intended products!
11 posts and 5 images omitted

Rule of Thirds (2024)

No.4337774 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
>While traveling out to the desert for a shoot, Monte Ashcroft a world class editorial photographer meets his new muse in Dakota Thompson, a local server at a desolate diner. Their connection is instant and profound, with the exception of one big secret.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11439124/

What are some notable /p/-approved kinos?
18 posts and 2 images omitted

IsItAI.com

No.4337124 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
This still needs a little work.
59 posts and 14 images omitted

The Leica glow..

No.4333651 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
would be called the shitty rendering of a soft vintage lens if it was manufactured by any other company.
38 posts and 11 images omitted

No.4338787 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
I am planning on hiking significant portions of the pacific crest trail and setting out on a full excursion in the next year or so. What gear should I bring?

I immediately thought of something like a Pentax K1/k3-3 and the 28-105mm f/3.5-5.6. It would give me a complete weather sealed kit with okay battery life.

But I was thinking it would actually be ideal if I could find a film setup. I would save so much weight. No (significantly less) batteries, no laptop, no power banks. I would just stop off at one of the many towns along the route and mail the film out, have them developed and scanned then returned to my parents house. I can have the scans emailed to me and uploaded from my phone.

But I am open to any other good solutions, what is your go-to here? Remember single lens solutions only.
25 posts and 1 image omitted

/fgt/ film general thread

No.4335670 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Massive Dev Chart Edition

yes the app is worth the investment subedition

/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit
>negative film ages better than positive
>black and white better than color
>slow films better than fast
>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years
>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited
>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.
>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 process


Useful links
>[massive dev chart] gives times for home film development
https://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php
>[film dev] shows results of development regimes
https://filmdev.org/
>[news & community links]
35mmc.com
casualphotophile.com
kosmofoto.com
emulsive.org
japancamerahunter.com

Previous thread >>4333649

Thread question(s):
Home or lab development?
Color or b-w development?
Powder or liquid developer?
Gentle and slow or rough and quick agitations?
Always at temp and time MDC says to use or adjust based on your environment?
Plastic or metal tank?
Agitate by hand or get a robot to do it?
Write down your methods or try to remember each time?
Dump your chems down the drain or recycle?
341 posts and 81 images omitted

/fgt/ Film General Thread

No.4339066 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
panorama edition

/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit
>negative film ages better than positive
>black and white better than color
>slow films better than fast
>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years
>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited
>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.
>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 process


Useful links
>[massive dev chart] gives times for home film development
https://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php
>[film dev] shows results of development regimes
https://filmdev.org/
>[news & community links]
35mmc.com
casualphotophile.com
kosmofoto.com
emulsive.org
japancamerahunter.com

Previous thread >>4335670

Thread question:
what film stock is in your camera now?
what are you shooting with it?

No.4333054 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
What makes this photograph so good?
55 posts and 6 images omitted

No.4338816 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
>ovfs being clearly suprerior
>allow you to always frame up and compose, even while the camera if off
>some gay faggot: "B-but I need to preview my exposure!"
>take one shot, look at it and adjust
Are people really this retarded that they can't even get close without a computer holding their widdle, itty-bitty baby fingees?
9 posts and 1 image omitted

New digishits 2024

No.4330724 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
When are gonna nips restart the digishit production? Will they restart the production at all?
While one might think that digishits are no longer needed due to phones, it is not the case. Phones are too small to jam good optics inside, especially zoom lenses.
So argument of "we won't make cameras that can be replaced with a phone" is kinda full of shit.
I think what did stop the sales of digishits, is corona. People bought digishits when they were traveling and realized that their phone kinda sucks. Or alternatively, they didn't just want to drain their phone battery in middle of nowhere in country where they don't speak local language for shit.

Seeing the success of Fuji X100VI or whatever it's called and similar big-ish sensor cameras, I wonder if they will start making bridge or compact cameras with smaller sensor but zoom lenses so you can get in close up and personal?
Or the success (of sort) Taiwanese Kodak digishits that are literally 2012 low-end digishit that is still manufactured today for some reason.

Think about it. Imagine what can you achieve with a modern phone sensor (which are quite big these days, 1/1.7" etc.), coupled with much bigger lens!
19 posts and 2 images omitted