.

This probably isn't the right place to post this but idk...

There's this dicsord clone that's getting really popular because it's open source and a bunch of youtubers are glazing it to jump on the dicsord downfall trend.

It's basically 2016 dicsord now with literally no moderation because it's a small team. Every server i join is full of actual pedos posting REAL CHILD pRoro-n and other disgusting stuff they think is funny.

If there's anyone here who knows how to "take down" sites I wish they'd do it to this one.

I like to eat poop

stirby

I'm shitmaxxing, I've already taken 5 shits today after pillmaxxing magnesium supplements and senna
Mogging your own toilet is the final blackpill

Aryeh incoming edition

>FTL NEWS:
-- Estanque is LIVE! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQHpoErOX-4
-- Some cringe streamstars nigga is there too...
-- CONNOR WOOD CONFIRMED FOR FISHTANK SEASON 5 https://old.reddit.com/r/fishtanklive/comments/1rfn4fk/connor_wood_confirmed_for_fishtank_season_5/
-- SEASON 5 STARTS MARCH 15TH https://x.com/fishtankislive/status/2023951871514149321
-- S5 location: Sandy Springs GA, duration: 30 days, S4 fish not returning, Sam not hosting

>Links:
https://www.fishtank.live/
https://x.com/fishtankislive
https://old.reddit.com/r/fishtanklive/
https://www.instagram.com/fishtank.live/
https://www.youtube.com/@fishtankislive/videos
https://fishtanklive.fandom.com/wiki/Fishtanklive_Wiki
https://elestanque.live/
https://x.com/Estanquedotlive
https://www.youtube.com/@ElEstanque_Live

Previous: >>24054430

Being short is Hell on Earth if you're a man and if you disagree you are genuinely dumber than rocks.

cirno practices the ancient chinese art of boiling trannys in an big enormous vat

INSTITUTIONAL BULLSHIT DETECTOR (MATH, SIMPLE)

Goal: detect when a system “responds” but won’t touch the mechanism.
1. The dodge (why replies go sideways)

Let your claim be x. It has features:

m = mechanism you’re pointing at (the hook)
i = identity salience (protected-category trigger)
c = civility score (forbidden words / tone)
e = effort to answer honestly

The system picks a reply y to maximize:

U(y|x) = Help − Risk − Effort

More explicitly:

U = δ·Help(m) − α·PolicyRisk(i,c) − β·ReputationRisk − γ·Effort(e)
with α,β,γ ≫ δ

Translation: it optimizes “don’t get blamed” more than “address m”.

So when PolicyRisk is high (i high or c low), it chooses cheap moves:

S: talk about PERSON/TONE instead of m
A: shift attention from mechanism to emotion (“u mad?”)
D: demand proof with no update (you pay the cost, they don’t move)

If you keep seeing S + A + D, that’s the pattern.
2. The bad-faith test (works for housing, crime, drugs, schools, etc.)

Define:

M = harm metric they claim to want DOWN (rent, overdoses, crime…)
A = direct fix that would reduce it (measurable): ∂M/∂A < 0
P = their preferred program that grows when harm grows: P = g(M), with g′(M) > 0

Test:

If they BLOCK A (the thing that makes M go down)
while pushing P (the thing that expands as M stays high),
then their revealed preference is not M. It’s P.

No mind-reading. No “conspiracy”. Just:
what lowers M?
what do they block?
what do they expand?

That’s the proof.
—

nigger