>>22283423>The philosophy encyclopedia linkedWe've already covered the inherent bias of the religious writer, who arbitrarily abuses the term, and the fact that religion is the red-haired stepchild of an entirely different species.
But it is your Paul Draper who says this:
> Gratuitous evils exist.> The hypothesis of indifference, i.e., that if there are supernatural beings they are indifferent to gratuitous evils, is a better explanation for (1) than theism.> Therefore, evidence prefers that no god, as commonly understood by theists, exists. >Ancient Romans literally called Christians atheistsYou have fallen for religious nonsense again. The early Romans wouldn't have used a Greek word. At best they might have called Christians "not-religious' or saeculari and once again your modern apologists misinformed you to fit their fabricated narrative. The Christian religion coined the term 'atheist' centuries later to designate one taxonomy of their many contrived 'enemies'.
This is why people laugh at you.