Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

No.2032098 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
If steel is so great, why do the companies that make the best steel tubing in the world use carbon for their forks?

If steel is so great, why do the finest steel bikes in the world use carbon forks?

It seems to me that steel has an aesthetic value that cannot be substituted by anything else, but as a material for building bikes, its value decreases the more that is demanded of a component.
114 posts and 25 images omitted

Why no motorcycle thread?

No.2061009 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Why don't we have a motorcycle thread?

Recently bought a used KTM Duke and am quite satisfied with it. Started researching about the company and noticed it's another failure of unsolvent european dying manufacturing sector. Pajeets are buying out the entire company with a 51% reacue package right now.

Why did it have to end like this? The bikes are so nice

/jrg/ - Japanese Railways General

No.2035672 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
E10 Series Edition

Old Thread: >>2014518
331 posts and 99 images omitted

/drt/ Daily Ride Thread

No.2054720 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Share your daily rides, post pics and stats. Complain about hills and mosquitoes.
you do actually ride your bike, right anon?

old thread >>2045380
239 posts and 111 images omitted

/pybt/ post your bike

No.2059993 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Post Your Bike Thread
Winter Warriors Edition
Previous Edition
>>>2054430
46 posts and 18 images omitted

John Forester did nothing wrong

No.2054733 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Old thread from 2023 finally hit bump limit >>1955863

New thread. "Cycling infrastructure" is harm reduction. But not in the way you probably think. The anti-bike crowd considers riding a bicycle on public roads as an offense against the interests of motorists. An so, they wish to create infrastructure to reduce cycling (harm). Yes! Those who advocate for "separate but equal" are (whether they admit it or not) working against the interests of bicycle users:

-The American Automobile Association strongly supports bike lanes
-Countries that place responsibility on car drivers have 70-90% fewer fatalities per billion km traveled by bike. This is of course beyond the pale, drivers must always have total immunity. But hey, look, green paint! We solved safety!
-The true purpose of bike lanes is to neutralize the opposition by corrupting the discourse. Don't support bike lanes? Then you must not care about safety!
-Bike lanes have a curious pattern of appearing where they are superfluous, and vanishing as you approach potential traffic conflict zones. This way, when you get run over by a dump truck making a turn, it's your fault! You shoulda been in the bike lane that wasn't there!

In conclusion: bike lane activists hate cyclists and want to eradicate cycling as a form of transportation.
149 posts and 18 images omitted

No.2046124 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>free buses
Cagebros...should I be afraid...?
216 posts and 29 images omitted

/bqg/ - BIKE QUESTIONS GENERAL

No.2060795 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
SDJS-034 edition
Resources:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/
https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/repair-help
Neutral Support News on Youtube

Watch Yumika (1997) - Nagaremono Zukan (1998) - Shiro (1999)

previous thread >>2059551
19 posts and 3 images omitted

Toronto Transit Expansion

No.2058715 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
After years of frustration, Toronto’s major LRT projects — the Eglinton Crosstown and Finch West lines — are finally taking shape. The infrastructure is largely in place, testing is active, and the city is on the verge of a real step forward in how people move across it.

The Crosstown will finally link east and west through midtown, while Finch West is basically a super streetcar in a poor area of the city.
Is light rail still a legitimate form of transit, or were Doug and Rob correct with their subways subways subways mantra?
16 posts and 4 images omitted

No.2060135 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
I think the states whose population don't care about public transit (Dallas, Houston, etc) should get stripped of their federal transit funding and be rerouted to fund the existing transit/infrastructure in Chicago, New York, Boston, Philly or DC.
9 posts and 3 images omitted