>Color Science edition

Previously: >>4495130

>ctrl f: sqt
>none
I'm going to start this one off with a stupider question than usual.
Say you were asked to shoot a few wedding shots at the last minute and all you've shot before was rocks, leaves, birds and the odd landscape or building corner... what do? Asking for a friend of course but pls reply quick.

Here we go again

Previously: >>4495770

why is this composition so funny

Insta and whatever else thread for wherever anons post their photos.

https://www.instagram.com/mondatta.photography/

Do any of you tend to go for certain themes and styles? Or just try anything?

Why do some old photos have a certain "look" to them that modern photos don't?

What makes Japan such an desired place for photography? I'm really trying to understand the hype around it. When I visited of course the size of Tokyo itself opens lots of opportunities but I quickly notice that it gets repetitive rather fast. All muh taxis look the same, the buildings have a pattern that repeats a lot. If you've seen a few shrines/temples.. in the end they all look the same. Even if you visit other prefectures you won't see much of a difference. Whenever I see camera vlogs or flickr uploads in Japan I now tend to skip because it's always the same.

My current number one location would probably be Germany. Still safe enough to bring your camera with you, every state has it's own architectural style. Towns are usually a comfy mix between old medieval houses in the center with grim 60s bauhaus constructions that look really odd. Also home of Leica where this sort of everyday compact photography started.

What do you think? What's your prefered location?

i found an app that takes unprocessed raw photos on iphone it actually makes me want to use my phone for pics. no im not a psyop for the app i just like it, its called moment pro camera 2 its paid but theres no microtransactions

ive never seen this kind of clarity out of my phone pics before but at even a mild iso noise is dogshit which i shouldve expected. picrel is the same exposure settings and lighting, left is with apple processing right is unprocessed raw.

dynamic range isnt great but its very usable. if ur shooting full manual the viewfinder is not very accurate the final image tends to be a lower exposure. surprisingly shooting longer exposures under 1/30 is doable cus iphones have sensor stabilization

contribute
mostly wanted to experiment with the 'natural' setting on the K10D
I think I used -2 saturation, 0 contrast, +1 sharpening but I adjusted it here and there
I also played with color correction in the WB but it wasn't too great

also, /digishit/ general bread

bricked edition

>>4492332