Quoted By:
Quoted By: >>4498570
5.4 is out, what do we think bros?
Quoted By:
So, which of the big companies is going to be the first to offer an affordable 100mp camera?
Fuji is obviously already out there, but this thing is Eight thousand dollars. I suspect that when it happens (eventually) it will be Nikon.
I feel like historically they are the company which has introduced high end features at a lower price.
Fuji is obviously already out there, but this thing is Eight thousand dollars. I suspect that when it happens (eventually) it will be Nikon.
I feel like historically they are the company which has introduced high end features at a lower price.
Quoted By:
Think about it logically.
The A7C series, despite its warts, is:
>responsible for a massive portion of E-mount adoption
>bestselling
>revealing of an enormous market for compact yet usable full frame stills MILCs
Why hasn't anyone else copied the concept?
inb4:
>A7C bodies are e-waste trash
Yes, that's why I want somebody else to try it.
>Sigma, Panasonic, Nikon
They all pussied out hard and catered too much to videofags. The fp could have been perfectly fine if they had traded the heatsink for IBIS and made the EVF solution less massive (ergo, added a hotshoe and copied Leica's Visoflex). Meanwhile, the bf is the fp but even less functional. The S9 caters to vlogfags above all. Without a viewfinder you're more or less fucked if you want to manual focus. Same for the ZR.
For this to work, these faggot product engineers need to get real. A small body, ideally 61MP, with IBIS, reasonably sized grip to not have to skimp on battery life and SD card(s), and a modular tilting EVF. It's really that fucking simple, and Sony has proved that it's not only technically and economically feasible, but also a very good business move. So why haven't they done it?
The A7C series, despite its warts, is:
>responsible for a massive portion of E-mount adoption
>bestselling
>revealing of an enormous market for compact yet usable full frame stills MILCs
Why hasn't anyone else copied the concept?
inb4:
>A7C bodies are e-waste trash
Yes, that's why I want somebody else to try it.
>Sigma, Panasonic, Nikon
They all pussied out hard and catered too much to videofags. The fp could have been perfectly fine if they had traded the heatsink for IBIS and made the EVF solution less massive (ergo, added a hotshoe and copied Leica's Visoflex). Meanwhile, the bf is the fp but even less functional. The S9 caters to vlogfags above all. Without a viewfinder you're more or less fucked if you want to manual focus. Same for the ZR.
For this to work, these faggot product engineers need to get real. A small body, ideally 61MP, with IBIS, reasonably sized grip to not have to skimp on battery life and SD card(s), and a modular tilting EVF. It's really that fucking simple, and Sony has proved that it's not only technically and economically feasible, but also a very good business move. So why haven't they done it?
Quoted By: >>4498566
Ugly
Not sharp
Near black and white
Red eye effect uncorrected
Photo of the decade
Not sharp
Near black and white
Red eye effect uncorrected
Photo of the decade
Quoted By:
This thread is dedicated to close-range photographic captures utilising macro-optical imaging configurations to achieve greater reproduction ratios. Got it? Good now upload some shit.
Last thread: >>4433352
Last thread: >>4433352
Quoted By:
Color Calibration Edition
Please post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.
Also talk about darkroom practices, enlargers, photo paper, techniques like dodging/burning, tools, and equipment related to enlarging, developing, and printing.
Thread Question: How much time do you spend post-processing (or printing) a single photo?
Previous thread: >>4494610
Please post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.
Also talk about darkroom practices, enlargers, photo paper, techniques like dodging/burning, tools, and equipment related to enlarging, developing, and printing.
Thread Question: How much time do you spend post-processing (or printing) a single photo?
Previous thread: >>4494610
Quoted By:
Quoted By:
Ones you've actually used.
Give reasons.
1. Panasonic - pleasing JPEG, best QOL - lots of features that work well.
2. Fujifilm - decent but I didn't like the JPEG detail rendering.
3. Olympus / OM system - decent, but I don't didn't like the JPEG colors (tans pushed to red).
4. Sony - lots of features on paper but they're half-baked and riddled with needless incompatibilities.
Give reasons.
1. Panasonic - pleasing JPEG, best QOL - lots of features that work well.
2. Fujifilm - decent but I didn't like the JPEG detail rendering.
3. Olympus / OM system - decent, but I don't didn't like the JPEG colors (tans pushed to red).
4. Sony - lots of features on paper but they're half-baked and riddled with needless incompatibilities.
Quoted By: >>4498523
Ideally aggressive flash photography.
