Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

ITT: YouTuber Hate

No.4463667 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Why are photography YouTubers so shit? They mostly churn out boring nontent while dressing like a copy of a copy of a copy of someone who thought he might closet cosplay Ansel Adams. Who are they aping?
Almost all have the cadence and tone of a best buy sales associate either slowly conniving a golden HDMI cable sale or postponing their suicide on a Sunday evening only since their parents are still alive; with no in-between.
I meet smarter and more interesting people IRL at camera club or local stores, so it's not as if this hobby is exclusively for people prescribed Klonopin and SSRIs.
Half of them are just talking head slop direct to camera talking about what gear to buy (micro four nerds)
The ones that do teardowns and repairs of gear are usually fine, but those aren't exactly photo videos at that point.

The only guy that does the "video of taking photos" thing I can stand is Nick LoPresti since he doesn't talk like he's constipated, but lately the lack of constipation has become a problem since he's been diarrhea-shitting up my sub box with low-effort commentary videos sitting in front of a green screen. Idk who he's aping there, 2016 twitch? Don't like it, especially one where he and his wife are politisperging about shit like how "they can't use Google search for inane things because it'll track you" for what feels like several minutes.

Snappiness may be my second favorite even though he looks and talks like a queer (he has kids so I guess he isn't technically). At least he does ridiculous things with cameras that are more interesting than "I walked and took a photo of something and had some ennui about it".

Also, I hate gxAce with a passion, dead horse of a gimmick beaten into dust at this point. 80% of his videos serve no purpose to the modal viewer since they're just a rain-dance to the corporate marketing teams to get them to send him gear. (Also combining sloppy wet deep-throat glazing prose with an aloof tone is uniquely excruciating to listen to.)
282 posts and 34 images omitted

/gear/ - gear general

No.4495130 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
bricked edition

>>4492332
256 posts and 36 images omitted

No.4495304 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Who's your favorite photographer? For me it's Alec Soth
3 posts and 2 images omitted

Ladies with cameras

No.4492310 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
59 posts and 34 images omitted

Hippies, cheap prices and negative scanning

No.4496532 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
I found a hippie in the country who would develop and scan my negatives, but here's the thing, I'm very new to analog photography (new to photography in general, actually) and I needed to know if his offer was a load of crap or not.
In this case, he would develop any of my negatives, whether black and white, orthochromatic, c-41 or ecn22, for the price of 5.73 US dollars and would scan them for 2.50 US dollars, that's for each roll, i.e., 36 exposures.
I won't know the real quality of the photos unless I test them, but these prices make me very suspicious of this crazy guy.
I don't know if it's better for me to develop the negatives at home (if that interferes with the quality of the photo or not) or if I should just send everything to him and that's it.
1 post omitted

/fgt/ - Film Photography Thread

No.4494610 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Furry Critters Edition

Please post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.

Also talk about darkroom practices, enlargers, photo paper, techniques like dodging/burning, tools, and equipment related to enlarging, developing, and printing.

Thread Question: Do you prefer color or black and white photography?

Previous thread: >>4489677
203 posts and 91 images omitted

I have nothing to say.

No.4495973 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
I have never created a piece of art that I like. I never came back to anything I did months later and thought to myself "hey, this is neat".

I can't use my hands to create shit. I can draw geometric shapes. I have nice handwriting. I can play open chords and bar chords on guitar. But that's where my physical skill set ends.

I picked up a camera because my hands are no good. Only to realize that it's probably not my hands, it's my brain. I have little to no visual imagination. I can memorize rules that make photos look more pleasing, but I can not get beyond that in terms of intent with my photos.

Over the last ten years, I resigned to the realization that I can't create anything because I have nothing to say. I have no personality. I have no opinions. I have no stories. Just things I point my camera at.
47 posts and 7 images omitted

Poor man's Xpan (and 16:9) images.

No.4495236 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Since I'm unlikely to ever get any kind of Xpan camera, I thought it might be interesting to post some wide crops from two cheap digicams and a phone (Fuijfilm J20, JX500 and Nokia Lumia 520) taken over the last few years. The JX500 has a scratched lens but nice colours and I think it does OK.

Some of these I've posted before, some I haven't.
11 posts and 8 images omitted

Local Book Fair

No.4486697 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Spent two hours at the local book market today. Reached the place a little while before sunset, pushed through my anxiety and tried my hand at taking some photographs.

Feel free to post any pictures you /p/ros took at any book fair or local market in your area.
63 posts and 14 images omitted

Could this finally make smartphone photography good?

No.4495591 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
> NATIVE 35mm f1.7 main lens with 1 inch sensor
> Dedicated two-step shutter button
> Co-developed with Zeiss using Zeiss lens coatings.
> Global release
Anyone else going to buy this beast? This phone will replace an X100V.
41 posts and 2 images omitted