Planes, Trains, and Automobiles Edition

Please post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.

Also talk about darkroom practices, enlargers, photo paper, techniques like dodging/burning, tools, and equipment related to enlarging, developing, and printing.

Thread Question: Do you develop yourself or let a lab do it for you?

Previous thread: >>4482671

dude talks 20 minutes about colors, and he uses pictures of a guy with a very weird color, like how the fuck do are we supposed to know what color this guy is supposed to be?

is he half black half white? is he indian? is he pakistanese ?

what the fuck this seems like the most ellaborate troll video ever made

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4PLMnUf0Gc

What's the secret to digital b&w photography?

Merry and bright edition

Previous thread: >>4487403

poverty porn photographers destroyed in one scene

Who's all still posting here?

Well nobody else is gonna so here we go, here's a RAW/EDIT thread.
I've provided some of mine, a few of which I've edited in the past but also a few I've never touched. Links:

>Daylight Landscape with Semi-Challenging Lighting.
https://files.catbox.moe/9lc3dk.CR3
>Backlit Wildlife (bin chicken) Scene. I was never happy with any edits.
https://files.catbox.moe/ctd0mg.CR3
>Interior Low-Light Figurines.
https://files.catbox.moe/l1fmr2.CR3
>Panning Motorsport Scene.
>also pic rel own edit
https://files.catbox.moe/c84va5.CR3

>This thread is less about the merits of a particular photograph, and more about how to edit and change them. CONSTRUCTIVE feedback is great, but aimless shitflnging is for the other threads
>I wholly encourage more of you to post RAWs, as I enjoy giving it a crack myself, as do some other anons otb
>Use catbox.moe to link uploads as there is no way you will upload your RAW with the board's anemic 5MB limit
>If you post a RAW, thank you.
>If you post an EDIT, it's handy to give a quick run down of what you did, how much NR/sharpening etc., and what software you used.
-----

this was the absolute peak of digital photography and its all been downhill after here. seriously look at the shots on flickr with this tag and how good they look. mirrorless is super sterile and fake looking, and older than the mkii just were shit to use and had too much noise.

seriously dont sleep on these, 5d mkii and some EF L glass has u covered and then u can spend the rest of the money on travel and taking kino shots.

What makes pic related so uncanny and unpleasant to look at? Is it the lack of shadows? Why would a photographer go for such effect?

Shot on a Bessa R2M with the 35mm f/2 Ultron and a mix of Fuji 100, Provia 100, and Portra 400.
Developed at various labs in Tokyo and Osaka, scanned by myself.