>>4484039Funny because it's true))
>>44840140: It's rare for any brand to do repairs of 10 year old products.
1: They launched a mirrorless and the audience rejected it. They listened and realized they had to be the flag bearers for the joy of reflex. Mirrorless is for optical cuckolds.
2: It's more than any other brand has done, the rest I replied above.
3: This is just bullshit. The IBIS works well and the colors are nikonlike if anything.
4: More hogwash, Pentax can be used with a sing hand. The others don't even have a proper grip.
5: A separate mode allows you to avoid wasting your life in menus.
6: My bad, meant pixel shift. But the K-3 III is king of non-Canon APS-C reach. So it's a valid reason for getting one. It's like getting a Hellcat Challenger. It's not as fast as the Demon but it will beat Camaros into submission with ease at the strip. And it won't bleed oil to its untimely death like a GM product.
>inb4 muh 40MP FujiThe data is destroyed by X-tranny to the point MFT offers more detail.
7: I was talking about K-3 III's massive magnification. However, you can replace the focusing screen if you so wish.
8: Only the KP which I don't even consider a real Pentax. It's hipster bait like all of Fuji and Nikon's vintage cope models. It doesn't even have a proper grip, utter garbage.