Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Screen vs Viewfinder

No.4497897 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Redpill me on screen vs viewfinder debate.

Personally I find screen to be way more comfortable. Viewfinder is a total pain in the ass.
32 posts and 8 images omitted

No.4489946 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
I went out on the streets late and took some photos tonight with this phone, here they are..
46 posts and 20 images omitted

/rpt/ - Recent Photo Thread

No.4497687 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Here we go again

Previously: >>4495770
67 posts and 55 images omitted

Why hasn't anybody copied the concept?

No.4496215 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Think about it logically.
The A7C series, despite its warts, is:
>responsible for a massive portion of E-mount adoption
>bestselling
>revealing of an enormous market for compact yet usable full frame stills MILCs
Why hasn't anyone else copied the concept?
inb4:
>A7C bodies are e-waste trash
Yes, that's why I want somebody else to try it.
>Sigma, Panasonic, Nikon
They all pussied out hard and catered too much to videofags. The fp could have been perfectly fine if they had traded the heatsink for IBIS and made the EVF solution less massive (ergo, added a hotshoe and copied Leica's Visoflex). Meanwhile, the bf is the fp but even less functional. The S9 caters to vlogfags above all. Without a viewfinder you're more or less fucked if you want to manual focus. Same for the ZR.
For this to work, these faggot product engineers need to get real. A small body, ideally 61MP, with IBIS, reasonably sized grip to not have to skimp on battery life and SD card(s), and a modular tilting EVF. It's really that fucking simple, and Sony has proved that it's not only technically and economically feasible, but also a very good business move. So why haven't they done it?
235 posts and 33 images omitted

/mage/ Macro Photography General

No.4498423 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
This thread is dedicated to close-range photographic captures utilising macro-optical imaging configurations to achieve greater reproduction ratios. Got it? Good now upload some shit.

Last thread: >>4433352

Which compact cameras take better photos than modern flagship phones?

No.4489617 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
I don't want to buy a new flagship every two years. I just want to have a nice pocket camera and keep my midrange for a while. My old olympus pocket camera lasted for almost a decade.
Preferably nothing more expensive than $700
28 posts and 3 images omitted

The GEAR problem was already solved

No.4478405 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
this was the absolute peak of digital photography and its all been downhill after here. seriously look at the shots on flickr with this tag and how good they look. mirrorless is super sterile and fake looking, and older than the mkii just were shit to use and had too much noise.

seriously dont sleep on these, 5d mkii and some EF L glass has u covered and then u can spend the rest of the money on travel and taking kino shots.
259 posts and 39 images omitted

/mfg/ Medium Format General

No.4482553 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Reply if you're a real mf'er
138 posts and 52 images omitted

/Gear/ Discussion General

No.4497651 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>Color Science edition

Previously: >>4495130
233 posts and 34 images omitted

/sqt/ stupid questions thread

No.4493120 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>ctrl f: sqt
>none
I'm going to start this one off with a stupider question than usual.
Say you were asked to shoot a few wedding shots at the last minute and all you've shot before was rocks, leaves, birds and the odd landscape or building corner... what do? Asking for a friend of course but pls reply quick.
232 posts and 25 images omitted