Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 10

No.4470128 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
I am going to buy one as soon as they hit the market in early Novemeber. I hope I get the 1987 edition. It's fire.
Which one are you hoping to score?
You are going to be getting one right /p/?
You aren't gonna be a contrarian try hard no Charmera /p/haggot are you /p/? ISHYDDT
270 posts and 112 images omitted

No.4476309 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
photos of my cat Rupert that i took on my phone which at least trace amounts of thoughtful composition, as per the board rules


I like this shot because it really focuses on his face, which is cute
83 posts and 39 images omitted

No.4499018 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Can I get some feedback on my latest artistic model photoshoot.
This time I tried some heavier shadows with a rembrandt lighting on the model and also created some nice cooler colors with my canon to enhance the mood.
I think the blue colors contrast with the models blond hair really well.
1 post omitted

/4:3/ general

No.4490365 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
After much positive feedback to the /m43/ general I re-thought the whole thing. Why limit to one mount if the defining defining feature is the aspect ratio?

Let's have a /4:3/ general for all the based chads who shoot in 4:3 ratio!

Welcome: Everyone whose system shoots natively in 4:3!

Also welcome: Those who accept the superiority of 4:3 and crop their 3:2 (cringe) images to the 4:3 (based) ratio.

Not welcome: Everyone else.

Topic of the first /4:3/ general ever: Are 5:4 and 6:7 based, too? Or are they just tryhard?

Discuss!
131 posts and 37 images omitted

You doing it wrong

No.4492136 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Give me your most abstract images related to cameras.
10 posts and 5 images omitted

thx in advance

No.4432765 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Can someone tell me what lightning equipment I would need, to recreate either of those photos?
48 posts and 10 images omitted

No.4496706 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Has anyone tried taking photos of stars from above the mesosphere?
5 posts omitted

Color science further examined

No.4498620 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
There has been a lot of discussion about camera brand color science lately so I thought it would be interesting to take the same shot and change the ICC profile in capture one to each of the 4 major ILC brands and post them unedited to see if /p/ can spot the differences between default color science. In a day or two i'll post the results and we can all see how close we got.
25 posts and 2 images omitted

No.4498250 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Ugly
Not sharp
Near black and white
Red eye effect uncorrected
Photo of the decade
17 posts and 4 images omitted