/p/ - Photography

273KiB, 2706x3240, mary and the monster.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

photoshoop

Anonymous Sun 23 Nov 2025 04:28:55 No.4484370 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

show me what kind of weird shit you can make with photoshop

678KiB, 1704x2272, IMG_6086.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 26 Nov 2025 20:46:41 No.4484922 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

What the actual hell is wrong with my editing and photo something looks very wrong in the photo and I can’t decide on what it is I’m trying to get like a vibe Juno claspo but it doesn’t really fit that vibe

27 posts and 4 images omitted

Sugar !egyYvoBZV2

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1137c-3482.jpg, 729KiB, 867x1300

Sugar !egyYvoBZV2 Mon 15 Dec 2025 13:41:12 No.4488401 Report

Quoted By: >>4488428

This was shot on a Canon 5D 12mp and edited in LR 3.5 on a Pentium 3 1ghz Dell c610 laptop with 2gb of RAM running XP SP3 on an IDE 40gb 4200rpm spinnydisk

Your arguments, all of them in this thread, from all of you, are invalid.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 15 Dec 2025 16:38:11 No.4488428 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488401
based blind man

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 15:43:31 No.4489293 Report

Quoted By: >>4489294

>>4488199
those star trails bug me, them seem incidental instead of intentional when clearly some level of effort went into taking & editing that photo

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 15:50:42 No.4489294 Report

Quoted By: >>4489307

>>4489293
Prolly just a side effect of exposing a night scene so long. I feel like anon didn't really care about three stars in the sky having a bit of a tail.
In fact I would have liked it more if they were even longer (but like, 10x as long)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 16:20:58 No.4489307 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489294
>Prolly just a side effect of exposing a night scene so long.
yes that's usually how you get star trails
I'm saying I would have retouched them out of the photo, or let it expose for like 4x as long
that's already like a 5' exposure, and either dawn or moonlight, so probably couldn't let it expose for much longer or the lighting changes too much

4MiB, 1080x1920, fujifilm in the moment enjoyer.webm

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

/Gear/ Containment

Anonymous Mon 01 Dec 2025 04:58:53 No.4485653 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By: >>4488941

>perfect colors right the first time edition

>>4484029

328 posts and 41 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 12:42:03 No.4488941 Report

Quoted By: >>4489019

>>4485653
I just bought a Snoy Alpha 57 with a broken stabilizer for 40 bucks. It's on the way to me. How fucked and/or retarded am I?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 02:49:13 No.4489019 Report

Quoted By: >>4489064

>>4488941
a57 is a great camera but broken stab makes it annoying to use but for $40 its decent, a charger/battery costs $20.

for reference i paid $180 for a a58 (newer 20mp sensor) locally with a 35mm f1.8 dt and its honestly a pretty enjoyable camera to use, newest i own for the a-mount lenses i still have. it uses the sensor from the a5000 so you get a good pic out of it. the sony cameras were great just horribly unreliable, near e-waste build quality. the SLT setup doesn't impact image quality as much as you'd believe because the sensors are still pretty damn good.

i would def pick up a a58/a65/a68/a77 if they were <$300 (like $180 for my camera is closer to $100 when the lens goes for $80). a68 is probably my next purchase if i can find one <$200.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 11:35:44 No.4489064 Report

Quoted By: >>4489260

>>4489019
Yeah, I thought it would be kind of a gamble but it comes with charger, original Sony carrying pouch, two old batteries (I ordered a new one), instructions and a CD ROM (?) that has software on it. All of it looks decent, like not dirty or anything. I thought I could get away with the broke stab because I intend to use it just for tripod shots in my home.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 08:33:01 No.4489260 Report

Quoted By: >>4489278

>>4489064
the broken stab should be fine if you're on a tripod unless the sensor is jammed or it throws a error code (these stupid slt cameras always do that).

pick up a decent strobe too if you're doing indoor photography. a cheap way is a minolta flash like a 3600hsd or 5600hsd or the metz/sigma equivalent since it uses the old style minolta and sony dslr hotshoe (a58 uses newer). should be pretty cheap, i have a 3600 hsd i picked up for $10 off buyee that gives me pretty accurate pttl and with a adapter even works on the newer sony cameras (i had it on a zv1)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 13:08:54 No.4489278 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489260
That's gonna be exciting. At that price I am not worried to yank around on it. We'll see if I can make it work.

454KiB, 1440x1440, 1746874767858756.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Cinematography

Anonymous Sat 08 Nov 2025 17:17:35 No.4481441 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

Should i get a Sony zv-e 10 II new or a Lumix S II.

My goal is 4k 30fps with the highest dynamic range possible, 10bit log and fast sensor readout speed (low jellow)

30 posts and 6 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 21:06:54 No.4489144 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488812
You're right about the apertures and f1.4 being a meme for it, but you do need an ND filter, that's the one piece of gear that is unquestionably needed unless you only film indoors.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 22:51:49 No.4489162 Report

Quoted By:

>>4481494
>posted it again award

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 23:04:49 No.4489166 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488812
You need an ND filter if you shoot any kind of log during daylight, even stopped down

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO nightcrawler_tr.jpg, 11KiB, 270x160

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 05:59:18 No.4489249 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488812
>No need of an ND filter
If you shoot "cienema" you are gonna be shooting with a 180degree shutter. With a base iso of most cameras at 800, 1/48s outside is going to be fucking impossible. Even 100iso will be a stop over at f16.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 08:59:40 No.4489262 Report

Quoted By:

>>4481589
>unzips dick
AI porn is so good its unreal. dont even need OF anymore

2MiB, 4032x3024, 1751939661168748.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Day Job Photographers

Anonymous Thu 11 Sep 2025 23:23:55 No.4467257 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

Anyone else here working a regular job/day job as a photographer? I've been working as a real estate photographer for a while and still do side jobs for things like corporate portraits/events, and I'm curious if anyone else on /p/ works in photography too.

43 posts and 1 image omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 04:39:57 No.4488758 Report

Quoted By: >>4489009

>>4488755
It's funny how so many gurus and people in your life say to make your job your hobby. Same thing with cars too, I knew a guy that loved cars and then fucking hated them and never did shit to his own car ever again after he started working as a mechanic. He let his car pretty much rot because he couldn't stand doing what he already did for work as an after work project.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 01:19:00 No.4489009 Report

Quoted By: >>4489141

>>4488758
Entry/mid level jobs require you to sell your soul to excel spreadsheets or lung cancer for pennies over minimal legal wage with unpaid overtime. Anything that can get you away from today's hellish market is desired

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 20:54:44 No.4489141 Report

Quoted By: >>4489179

>>4489009
>he thinks the photography/filmography industry isn't also soul crushing or pays more than pennies
Lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 00:00:35 No.4489179 Report

Quoted By: >>4489250

>>4489141
I meant that market of regular jobs is so unbearable to people any escape plan is giving them hope. that means escaping right into the trap of even more competitive and ungrateful industry or hell of getting contracts for small buisness survival

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 06:03:33 No.4489250 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489179
Gotcha. Same thing I did, I was in a normie regular job and jumping into a full time professional photography job sounded like a dream come true, but it just meant getting fucked in pay and essentially being told I was really lucky and other people dream of getting the job.
I've no doubt they replaced in me in seconds but who knows how long the new guy will last, the industry rotates through normal people fast while only the people who are willing to be shit on will remain.

187KiB, 1059x1600, shopping.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Weird Cameras that you like

Anonymous Wed 08 Oct 2025 22:38:59 No.4473524 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

I have way better gear but this little fucker has become a great companion for vlogging, even with all the drawbacks

Do you have a favorite flawed piece of gear?

20 posts and 9 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Q8n-4K_Slant_Left_01-scaled-1.jpg, 347KiB, 2507x2560

Anonymous Wed 12 Nov 2025 21:29:14 No.4482419 Report

Quoted By:

The quality is shit but the audio is great

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO s-l1200.jpg, 398KiB, 1200x1200

Anonymous Sat 15 Nov 2025 22:49:21 No.4483068 Report

Quoted By: >>4483080

Kodak ZI8.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 15 Nov 2025 23:01:21 No.4483080 Report

Quoted By: >>4483130

>>4483068
Man, that takes me back. Remember when Flip cameras were all the rage for what, two or three years there, before “smartphones” really took over? I had a Kodak one that had jelly video like crazy but it could do 720p! Used it quite a bit lol.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Nov 2025 00:13:31 No.4483130 Report

Quoted By:

>>4483080
The ZI8 had a few advantages over the Flip
>1080p instead of 720p
>Used SD cards instead of internal memory
>Mic jack
>Image stabilization (whatever that consisted of)
I remember I had a "rig" for mine that consisted of a cheap "L" bracket with a couple of cold-shoe mounts that I used for the mic and for an external light.

Yeah, it was an interesting time. Smartphones were around, but they hadn't completely taken over. And even then, the cameras on them were just "okay." So to get full HD in something that fit in your pocket AND was under $200 was pretty cool.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 21:30:20 No.4489156 Report

Quoted By:

>>4473540
is that a fucking iDroid?

1MiB, 1000x669, IMG_2248.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Photos for a friend

Anonymous Sat 29 Nov 2025 07:26:09 No.4485327 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

Some photos I took for a friend in Oregon a while back - any good?

99 posts and 16 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 04 Dec 2025 16:31:57 No.4486349 Report

Quoted By: >>4486350

>>4486347
That just sounds like post-hoc cope now
But it was worth the effort to defend low effort comments though?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 04 Dec 2025 16:33:25 No.4486350 Report

Quoted By: >>4486353 >>4486354

>>4486349
Not really but I was bored desu so I don't mind
Hope you enjoyed what came out of your b8

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 04 Dec 2025 16:37:25 No.4486353 Report

Quoted By: >>4489121

>>4486350
I did, I made some effort posts and will continue to putting effort into making this board better
Looking at photos and figuring out what was done poorly and what could be done better is a great exercise I would encourage everyone to do
Hopefully you come around and would like to see the board be better too one day

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 04 Dec 2025 16:43:09 No.4486354 Report

Quoted By: >>4489121

>>4486350
Oh and I'll keep trying to call out low effort useless feedback too, hope you can do the same

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 19:22:03 No.4489121 Report

Quoted By:

>>4486353
>>4486354
All you ended up doing was randomly posting in other threads with the "lel that's old" seethe routine and start more fights. You are a loser.

49KiB, 286x420, e588780e48e19bac465a27268d145cb0.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 18:47:09 No.4488846 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4488952 >>4488953

I'm gonna attend a wedding on saturday and i want to shoot some film. It's an african wedding, so there will be loads of bright colors and warm hues. I shoot with a Point and shoot camera (pentax iqzoom), but i own a SLR (Nikon fg 20). I have never shot with an slr camera, and i have no clue how they work. But i reckon the pictures look better on an slr. I have two dilemmas at hand
>I don't know which film stock is good for capturing warm hues
>I don't know if i should try out the slr camera (or if i should play it safe)

i want to capture something reminiscent of picrel

8 posts omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 13:30:52 No.4488946 Report

Quoted By: >>4488947 >>4489051

>>4488924
>I think it will be pretty well lit inside,
NTA. Don't be fooled. Even pretty heavy indoor lighting is nowhere near the LV of the outdoors.
Indoors with film I'm normally pushing HP5 to 800 at minimum and realistically to 1600 (but I think it looks kind shit pushed two stops).
At 800 ISO I'm only just in a "safe" shutter speed range to avoid camera shake and I need to ask people to stay still for photos indoors.

400 ISO film is absolute minimum for indoors and I'd be pushing that one stop anyway. If you're using colour film then fagghedaboudit

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 13:36:18 No.4488947 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488946
Portra and Lomo 800 work fine indoors, if a bit grainy. But pushing hp5 will make the grain apparent too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 14:47:51 No.4488952 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488846
get old gold 100 (2006-2005)

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 15:54:11 No.4488953 Report

Quoted By: >>4489051

>>4488846

it is possible to mount 28mm (if you have one) to fg-20 set aperture to 5.6 and 3.3m focus and shoot day with kodak 100 proimage

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 08:38:58 No.4489051 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488946
Didnt understand half of that but what I got is
>get 400 iso
I dont really like the look of kodak ultramax 400 though. It doesn't look warm, and it doesnt have that "film" look
>>4488953
I have decided to use the point anf shoot so i dont think i can make adjustments like that.

I need to finalize what kind of film I'll be using because im going to buy it later today. Ektar100 or kodak gold is what i am considering right now

24KiB, 1003x564, IMG_2098.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

your moon shots

Anonymous Wed 20 Aug 2025 13:14:15 No.4461077 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

lemme see your shots for the moon!
this is mine btw
captured with canon 2000d 55mm i can not remember my camera settings
i gave it some edit with lightroom this is first time with DSLR

128 posts and 71 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Moon(2).jpg, 2MiB, 6008x7999

Anonymous Fri 12 Dec 2025 03:57:21 No.4487823 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO MarsMoon(overLumen)Venus.jpg, 2MiB, 3000x1900

Anonymous Sun 14 Dec 2025 07:42:28 No.4488213 Report

Quoted By: >>4488214

Mars (left), waning crescent Moon (over Lumen Field, Seattle), Venus (up, right of Moon) rising Sept. 11, 2015.
Nikon D5200, kit 18-55mm at 55mm, f/8, 2sec, ISO-1000

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Dec 2025 07:44:22 No.4488214 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488213
Oops. Sept. 10, 2015.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_20251208_012918.jpg, 185KiB, 705x941

Anonymous Tue 16 Dec 2025 03:59:28 No.4488558 Report

Quoted By:

ZV-E10 + SEL55210 taken last week iirc, obviously cropped

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 20250704_0282.jpg, 654KiB, 6048x4024

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 20:56:10 No.4488989 Report

Quoted By:

2MiB, 2021x1434, camera.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 16:52:38 No.4488831 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4488935

I am looking for a first camera, would something like this guarantee significantly better quality pics than Iphone 12, or not at all?

27 posts and 1 image omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_4313.jpg, 4MiB, 5184x3456

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 03:28:36 No.4488903 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488865
Yeah, sensor size and good glass is key.
They suck in low light though.
Buying a mid range DSLR from 2010 or later with a 50mm. f2.0 is a great start, especially since many people drop the hobby after a few months and sell their gear at a loss.

cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE

cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE Thu 18 Dec 2025 03:53:25 No.4488905 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488887
...in favor of the Canon.
Fujifilm is literally the worst digital camera you can buy at a photography store.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 06:49:24 No.4488913 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488852
That's literally my exact gear, which I got as my first 'real' camera somewhat recently. I personally couldn't be happier with my choice. I love the fact that this camera comes with all of the standard pro features, as far as buttons/dials/switches go. The full-frame sensor does some insanely heavy lifting, so even though I had totally fucked up, retarded exposure settings dialed in for much of the first couple thousand photos I took, they were still almost always salvageable.

I've learned quite a bit, but I'm still painfully new and untrained; I don't know for sure if I'm basically on the same level as some retarded soccer mom who gives the camera 5 stars on Amazon because it takes "the best pictures ever", but this definitely seems like a great first camera if you know you're interested in photography and you're capable of growing into it.

It was between this R6 mkii, or an R8 for me. If you have the money to spend, I feel like they're both fantastic choices. Between these two, if you have a smaller budget or aren't totally sure you're into photography, the R8 is great. If you know for sure you're interested in photography, the R6 mkii seems like pretty unbeatable bang for buck that you can grow into for years to come.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 10:53:21 No.4488935 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488831
If you listen to ^them you'll probably use your new professional camera which is practically 10x bigger and heavier than your iphone once or twice and it will never come out of your drawer ever again.

>get a budget
>find cameras look good to you
>it MUST also look you can carry it every fucking where to you
>Is it on the budget?
>yes- buy it
>no- increase your budget or find affordable one that looks good to you

I've seen so many noobs brought canonikon cameras and even snoy A7C and used it only few times because it's too bukly and not convenient to carrying it around

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 12:41:57 No.4488940 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488862
>Pic related was taken with a 2011 camera + 50mm 2.8 macro lens
Which camera though

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Threads by latest replies - Page 10

On these archives

Your latest searches

photoshoop

/Gear/ Containment

Cinematography

Day Job Photographers

Weird Cameras that you like

Photos for a friend

your moon shots