Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
Threads by latest replies - Page 11
Anonymous
I am going to be honest anons. I am highly ambitious photographer and have a strong desire for critical acclaim for my work but I am not getting it and it is causing me lots of mental stress. I can't mange to live with myself. There are very minimal prospects of getting published from where I am. There is a deep rooted fear in me of fucking up and making mediocre art. I am not even "putting myself out there" because I loath myself that you still haven't forged your style, your education and practice is not complete and also because people scare me. I keep saying to myself one day things will fall into their place then I will be ready to take my shot.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4473876 At least there's a subject
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4473876 Wdym? I posted 2 photos even.
Anonymous
>>4473875 Lmao you're still convinced I'm samefagging. Didn't read. Seek help.
Wait wait, let me try being a schizo as well
>Clearly your use of run-on sentences means your the same anon I disagreed with from a thread 7 months ago. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4473929 schizo post tee bee haitch
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4471250 Most of what youre after happens by chance or mistake. you cant force it it backfires everytime. only way to force it is with shit loads of money and rich parents. as for the rest of us. patience.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
contribute
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4478137 I've never known a pentax camera to not have some arbitrary cheap-out, so I guess that checks out. Even the LX I once owned has this same takeup spool design as the one found on the super A, which is like a plastic drum housing lots of little plastic spindles that were supposed to pinch the film. The drums fall to pieces as release the spindles inside the film bay. Very unfortunate.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477941 Oh I've got heaps indeed. Never checked befor, but it seems there are 55110 files in my photo folder. Maybe 25k raw, 30k jpegs. give or take. But very much crap of course. I just almost never ever delete.
was thinking of a phone thread recently too. xz-1 is from olympus. A point and shoot.
Anonymous
>>4477538 >mfw Hunter Line local Got any of Kurri Kurri and Cessnock, few old run down 70s-80s era shopfronts
Anonymous
>>4478316 nar man, would be cool tho
they’ve got soul
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4478523 Generally any run down industrial area in Newcastle and the pending recession coal towns. Sydney just has nothing to offer anymore
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Film photography is better due to low sensitivity in dark areas. No one needs to see what is in dark areas most of the time. Just imagine this photo with unnecessary crap in shadows.
Anonymous
>>4474172 Have you even read Ansel Adams, anon?
>I could not find my Weston exposure meter! The situation was desperate: the low sun was trailing the edge of clouds in the west, and shadow would soon dim the white crosses ... I suddenly realized that I knew the luminance of the Moon – 250 cd/ft2. Using the Exposure Formula, I placed this value on Zone VII ... Realizing as I released the shutter that I had an unusual photograph which deserved a duplicate negative, I quickly reversed the film holder, but as I pulled the darkslide, the sunlight passed from the white crosses; I was a few seconds too late! The lone negative suddenly became precious. Anonymous
>>4474174 He didn't need a light meter because he knew where he wanted to place the moon. Expose for shadows and develop for highlights is the basic idea before you really understand what exposure and development does in relation to producing density/contrast on film, which is then translated onto photographic paper when making a print.
Anonymous
>>4474179 The moon was one of the lower highlights, anon.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4474282 Can you read, anon?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Here are my bad photos of a theme park. I only took a 20 year old digishit with me. Enjoy
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4471014 >>4471017 lf1 anon here...i didn't post any images here yet...
i bought it..saw that fat hair on sensor and dropped it
until today when i fixed it...
will take it out soon.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4452698 >Devag I'd like to D her vag, if you know what I mean.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4464047 now I want some halbes hendl
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anyone else here working a regular job/day job as a photographer? I've been working as a real estate photographer for a while and still do side jobs for things like corporate portraits/events, and I'm curious if anyone else on /p/ works in photography too.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4475963 It's the poor use of HDR. Using HDR is standard in real estate photos, but not everyone implements it in a nice way.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4476430 I imagine it's a blind wall to make the dinning party feel fancier/less distracted but it's done in a very small place it might as well break the harmony, doesn't help the fancy chandelier is in the kitchen spot either
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4476430 There are some real weird places around. Last week I photographed a place where downstairs just had two bedrooms and one bathroom but the upstairs was a bedroom, big bathroom, massive kitchen and massive living room. There was no reason for it either, it was a completely normal looking two story from outside and was just weirdly designed inside.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4467257 I work in commercial photography for almost a year but ended up quitting and going back to a normie job. Like others have said, it starts to zap your enjoyment of photography. I probably only took my camera out for fun maybe 2 times during my entire tenure since I just didn't feel like going out and taking more photos after spending the whole work week taking photos.
I think the only photography job that might be enjoyable is one that is very creative (cars, models etc) while anything like products, buildings, real estate etc would be more for someone that doesn't have much interest in photography to begin with.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Own and have used them all - Sony, Canon, Leica, Fuji. Nothing compares to this little guy. Has reignited my passion to shoot and is now always in my back pocket. Any other shooters feel the same?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4476741 What camera do you use?
Anonymous
>>4464928 Why would APS-C matter in a studio setting?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4476807 >butut it was a studio! cope more
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4476538 Between the RIcoh GR IV and the x100vi I'm picking the fuji. Not many people are talking about it but the Ricoh GR iv has build in diffusion filter in it's lens. Smears high lights to all hell and doesn't have a modicum of weather sealing. The fuji at least has a built in flash and better build quality too. Getting a cheap GR iii is probably the best option but it's kind of a wash unless cost matters to you.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
There's a megathread on the other site about GRIV's known issues. Damn.
Anonymous
I need to see flat earth.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4478362 >equivalency is a thing >applies this to f/ stop but not focal length cANON has infected your brain
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4478233 maybe shoot raw
tinker with lensfun database
type raw develop recipe for each pic
Anonymous
>>4478354 What iPhone has a 1 inch sensor
I think they're just reaching 2/3"
Anonymous
>>4478376 1/1.33" is common as fuck these days (3/4 of an inch). Pretty sure the 2021 Google Pixel had that so I'd be fuckin floored if the iPhone isn't doing better than it in 2025
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4478382 Only the Japanese (Sony, Sharp) and Chinese (Xiaomi, Ulefone, vivo, Huawei) do 1" and above in smartphones, American and Korean brands do not care.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Why is he so mad about a commercial quoting Ronald Reagan?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
If it's wrong, why is it so good?
cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE
>>4475876 Cope, EVF cuckold.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4475882 the only cope here is pretending you use a camera
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4475882 >EVF The hell is this?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4473816 >>4473212 >>4473207 Who are these retards that don’t put a maximum on iso, I shoot P and it’s great every time , when things are fast put it on S, manual mode is for dorks who want to make things harder for themselves for no reason other than ‘I’m a pro now’. P does better than you
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4473212 Retard if you're gonna post Yoshitoshi ABe on /p/ you have to post the drawings with the SMEGMA
>FOVEON WON
Anonymous
So you're telling me I can avoid the film developer costs? Why ever send out film to be developed?
Anonymous
>shoot film just to make a jpeg
Anonymous
>>4478217 >So you're telling me I can avoid the film developer costs? Yes, buy a digital camera!
Anonymous
>Shoots film because of le infinite MP and tonality >scans it with a 30MP digital sensor >Guys look at my film shots!
Anonymous
>>4478217 You still need to develop the film, silly. That just scans it.
If you're doing b&w film you can get dev costs down to like 5 cents per roll if you make your own developer.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4478225 >>4478228 >>4478232 This is why I switched to digital after shooting film for about 5 years. Film cameras are fun and all... but the practicality of digital can't be beat UNLESS you're playing to the specific strengths of film and it's worthwhile to have a less-convenient process.
>>4478240 This too. OP confirmed stupid dummy who smells bad, pic related
