/p/ - Photography

11KiB, 261x382, IMG_0661.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 28 Nov 2025 05:44:01 No.4485182 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

Damn this is so edgy

1MiB, 2000x1279, image.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

/rpt/ - Recent Photo Thread

Anonymous Tue 11 Nov 2025 22:57:20 No.4482160 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

Autumn edition
Previous thread >>4479021

239 posts and 151 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO MVC-015S.jpg, 147KiB, 640x480

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 05:26:32 No.4484977 Report

Quoted By:

>>4484969
>>4484974
>>4484914
These are really nice

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO solitudini II_3.jpg, 4MiB, 6240x4160

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 09:20:52 No.4484996 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSCF4315.jpg, 624KiB, 1080x1620

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 09:33:40 No.4484998 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1762420436162384.jpg, 3MiB, 1800x1800

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 16:17:28 No.4485059 Report

Quoted By: >>4485172

>>4484571
Thank you! I appreciate the time you took to write that. I have tried embracing reflections as part of the composition, but nothing that comes together especially coherently. I do love shooting mannequins but no kino yet. If it isn't reflections, it's a dirty ass window.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Nov 2025 04:09:44 No.4485172 Report

Quoted By:

>>4485059
happy to do so anon. I like your pic, the poses are fun and sure the window is a bit dirty but I think this is pretty close to being a really really good photo. the reflection here could easily make the story - is someone looking in hoping to get the job? is someone walking away, perhaps rejected? or even just the excitement of the mannequins could contrast with the normalcy of the street outside. give yourself some credit, because (to me, anyway) it seems like you're approaching things from the right perspective and just need to work on some of the finer details. I'll be on the lookout your next shots

111KiB, 1000x667, Astrophotography.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Astrophotograpgy

Anonymous Fri 21 Feb 2025 06:46:58 No.4408437 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

New thread

233 posts and 89 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 19:37:19 No.4485108 Report

Quoted By: >>4485111

>>4485071
I immediately regretted not getting a Goto version when trying to use higher power eyepieces on Saturn and Jupiter but you get the hang of tracking stuff manually pretty quickly, I love it now. Hopefully I can pull an all nighter this weekend and really use it because almost every single night since I bought it it has been cloudy + windy. Did you get a Skywatcher as well? I noticed they advertise it as coming with 25mm and 10mm eyepieces yet mine came with a 20mm and 12mm instead and a phone mount, not complaining, just a bonus.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 19:41:10 No.4485109 Report

Quoted By: >>4485111

>>4485071
Also is that Saturn?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 19:47:49 No.4485111 Report

Quoted By: >>4485114

>>4485108
>>4485109
Yes, Sky-Watcher 300P GoTo. I was going to get the non-computerised one but my dad told me I would regret it and it's worth the extra money and I can still get the fun out of manually finding objects. I have to say I'm glad I went with the GoTo. It's been the same here, I've used it once since I bought it three weeks ago because it's just been shit weather but the radar looks good for tomorrow night so hopefully I get a good night of viewing the outer planets + the Moon. Mine was advertised with 20mm and 12.5mm and that's what I got. Maybe they changed it and forgot to update it. And yes, it's Saturn and Titan (the gold one to the left). I'm going to try and tinker with the mirrors to get them better alligned because I noticed some aberration especially with Jupiter, I want to buy some higher power eyepieces soon. Did you get any use out of the phone holder yet? It seems really chinky and cheap and I don't really fancy messing about with it in the cold trying to take sub-par pictures.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 20:22:24 No.4485114 Report

Quoted By:

>>4485111
Nice, I sort of tried the phone mount but it doesn't seem to fit very snug, you can't secure it very tight or you'll just end up gouging out bits of rubber from your eyepieces plus if your phone has multiple cameras you'll have to keep moving it side to side when you manually focus, not viable when your target is zooming across the view in <10 seconds. I read that the Celestron phone mounts sit much more secure with the giant clamp but that only solves one issue. Don't do what I did and get a cheap laser collimator either, you'll spend more time trying to collimate the collimator than using it on the mirrors, only to find when you put it in your scope in the 2" adapter it came with that it wiggles around anyway, just use the collimation cap that came with the scope.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO soul.jpg, 492KiB, 2560x1691

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 20:26:45 No.4485115 Report

Quoted By:

705KiB, 2048x1365, lf2.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 26 Jul 2025 03:57:22 No.4452672 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

photos

92 posts and 31 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO lk15.jpg, 458KiB, 2048x1365

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 14:03:01 No.4485028 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO lk18.jpg, 557KiB, 2048x1365

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 14:04:23 No.4485030 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO lk19.jpg, 424KiB, 2048x1365

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 14:05:25 No.4485031 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO lk176.jpg, 499KiB, 2048x1365

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 14:06:26 No.4485032 Report

Quoted By: >>4485058

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 16:17:20 No.4485058 Report

Quoted By:

>>4485032
These are boring af on multiple levels. The subject is boring af and then you stripped it of colors. Seems like a high school assignment for architectural shadows. Idk why anyone would freely choose to make this their subject. Depressing in a dumb way. Sorry so harsh tho, just bein honest. Hope this helps.

65KiB, 840x1000, nodal-ninja-6-panoramic-head-with-rd10-adva.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Thu 23 Oct 2025 19:22:08 No.4477015 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

Which do you think is more useful for Architecture photography - a Panoramic tripod head? Or A Tilt Shift lens?

19 posts and 1 image omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 08 Nov 2025 18:30:09 No.4481460 Report

Quoted By:

>>4481438
Tilt-shift lens needs bigger good quality image circle than not-ts of same focal length, using movements move the frame off the optical axis of lens. That, mechanics and low demand add the cost up.

Samyang has less expensive tilt-shift lenses. Also medium format lens to dslr/mirrorless tilt-shift adapters exist (dunno how $$$ wide angle medium format lenses are). If you want a toy Lensbaby may still be a thing.

I've only used large format camera movements myself.asjhy

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_3273.jpg, 924KiB, 1534x1731

Anonymous Wed 26 Nov 2025 06:10:17 No.4484809 Report

Quoted By: >>4484919

get one of these bad boys. put a dslr or mirrorrless on the back and whataver lens you want on the front. i used several ts lenses and adaptors but they simply dont compare.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Nov 2025 20:32:32 No.4484919 Report

Quoted By: >>4484983

>>4484809
With this setup you can’t use shorter lens than 80mm. You will need digital back to use shorter lenses

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 07:09:09 No.4484983 Report

Quoted By:

>>4484919
i forgot about that. im acurakly using mamiya 645 macro lenses on mine.

https://www.captureintegration.com/cambo-actus-lens-compatibility-table/

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 15:49:26 No.4485044 Report

Quoted By:

>>4480961
I shoot arch. I mostly use the tilt-shit when shooting things that are going to need to be tiled, like a huge vertical panel in an atrium yesterday I couldn't shoot any other way. If I have to stitch images together, they're getting shot on the TS. It eliminates the risk of time wasted dicking around with failed pano merges and other artifacts of trying to do it in post.

Most things you can correct in-camera, you should. Just shoot it right the first time.

320KiB, 880x1280, 32713772_003_558f.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Did porn look better on film?

Anonymous Mon 13 Oct 2025 08:11:06 No.4474453 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4476144

Should industry switch back to film for better skin tones?

11 posts and 2 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 19 Oct 2025 19:13:45 No.4476063 Report

Quoted By:

>>4476055
No, but photos used on cover box of VHS tapes were shot on film.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 19 Oct 2025 23:05:56 No.4476144 Report

Quoted By:

>>4474453
I can imagine that "the industry" would rather switch to HDR or render the same film in multiple color gradings.

Like you get a little option if you want the film to look "lifelike", "vibrant" or "retro"

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 26 Oct 2025 08:32:32 No.4477515 Report

Quoted By: >>4484628

yes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCjMZMxNr-0

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Nov 2025 09:11:20 No.4484628 Report

Quoted By:

>>4477515
what do you mean

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 12:44:31 No.4485017 Report

Quoted By:

>>4474517
Bright headlight so it looks like a poor snuff film. More and more popular these days

2MiB, 480x400, facepalm.gif

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 11 Nov 2025 21:43:09 No.4482143 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4484763 >>4484891

Are all people in the cinema industry dickheads?
Been looking around r/cinematography and people there seem to be a mix of audiophile retardation and pretentiousness of the highest order

15 posts and 1 image omitted

Zach !ozOtJW9BFA

Zach !ozOtJW9BFA Fri 21 Nov 2025 18:10:38 No.4484225 Report

Quoted By:

I mean at least here on 4chan I get people who love learning from my posts. Reddit never wants to learn, as they just regurgitate bullshit over and over again. And what I write ain't even overtly political like Reddit!

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2025 20:18:35 No.4484243 Report

Quoted By:

>>4484205
Cringe

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Nov 2025 00:38:22 No.4484763 Report

Quoted By: >>4484884

>>4482143
They're white? They give awards to Spanish/Mexican folk from the guilt of it. Asians took to digital media and dick worship the shallow graves of what's left of the french new wave. It all ended with Kubrick.

cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE

cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE Wed 26 Nov 2025 18:08:33 No.4484884 Report

Quoted By:

>>4484763
FNW was a mistake. Navel gazing cin*philes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Nov 2025 18:28:19 No.4484891 Report

Quoted By:

>>4482143
>cinephile here, I watch tv like a professional tv watcher bc this formulaic bullshit written at a 5th grade level is serious business worth discussing as "art"
>surely everyone here thinks about me and cares about me and keeps track of where I go and post all of my brilliant thoughts

Hoooly fuck. Cringe doesn't even cover this. Get a fucking friend.

270KiB, 1080x725, Serrano 1.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Andres Serrano

Anonymous Sat 15 Nov 2025 22:52:35 No.4483069 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By: >>4484887

Posting all his series.

Posting first:
Early Works

(SELECT WORKS)

1984 - 1987

165 posts and 150 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Nov 2025 13:05:45 No.4484380 Report

Quoted By: >>4484459

Holy fuck, I am sorry Andres Serrano for not checking out your work due to memes, I wasn't aware of your game.

Thank you OP for sharing. This shit is gold.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Nov 2025 13:07:21 No.4484383 Report

Quoted By:

I want to bust a nut on this >>4483088 series very erotic and fascistic.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Nov 2025 03:20:46 No.4484459 Report

Quoted By:

>>4484380
I couldn't upload all his series due to the image limit, but check out his other stuff hosted on his website.
https://andresserrano.org/series/budapest

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Nov 2025 16:36:58 No.4484857 Report

Quoted By:

Wow, his photography is honestly shocking and beautiful way ahead of his time to be honest

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Nov 2025 18:14:34 No.4484887 Report

Quoted By:

>>4483069
>Mexican intellectuals

1MiB, 2311x4096, FnZF1SmaMAgfRx7.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 10 Nov 2025 16:20:05 No.4481813 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By: >>4484833

Give it straight to me, /p/.

Are Leica M cameras a meme? Or are they worth it?
Mainly for portraits, and rock and leaves.

141 posts and 13 images omitted

Sugar !egyYvoBZV2

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO GettyImages-541320861-1024x683.jpg, 164KiB, 1024x683

Sugar !egyYvoBZV2 Mon 17 Nov 2025 21:33:15 No.4483605 Report

Quoted By:

>>4483597

That was hardly seething, he's right about a few things. Most people with Leicas buy them for the image not because they need something compact, there's a lot of cameras that do the same thing the Leica does and cost a lot less.

wait, hang on i'm doing this all wrong from the get go:

YOU DON'T NEED LEICA THAT COST MORE THAN AVERAGE SOVIET HOUSEWIFE

YOU DON'T NEED IMPERIALIST JAP CANNON OR KNEE-CONE THAT SHOOT 13FPS OF CAT ON AMERICAN LAZEEEEE-BOY SOFA

YOU DON'T NEED SONE-EEE MIRROR-LESS CAMERA OF VAPID YOU TUBING PERSONALITY

BUY SOVIET CAM. FED OR ZORKI IS FINE! IS MADE FROM BASTARD NAZI DESIGN AFTER SOVIET ARMY HUMILIATE THEM. BUY 5CM LENS. LEARN HOW TO FOCUS BEFOREHANDS. LEARN HOW SUBJECT MOVE IN AND OUT OF FRAME

SHOOT BLACK AND WHITE FILM. SMENA IS FINE! DON'T SHOOT SLIDE FILM AND DEVELOP IN DRUGGIST PHOTOMACHINE. THAT MAKES YOU HIPSTER ASSHOLE WHO RELIES ON MISTAKES. MISTAKES GET YOU KILLED LIKE BASTARD NAZI ARMY WHO DECIDE TO FIGHT IN WINTER OF GLORIOUS MOTHERLAND

YOU DON'T NEED TELEPHONE CAMERA OF INSTANT GRAM CAPITALIST RETARD GIRL. GO AND TAKE PICTURES LIKE GREAT SOVIET MAN.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Nov 2025 20:58:41 No.4484011 Report

Quoted By:

>>4482320
How do wedding shoots on manual focus go? Also with more limited capabilities for telephoto, no zoom, no macro ring shots, etc
All the wedding shooters I know are using SLRs or mirrorless with big bruiser sports pro zooms, so you must be really good or have a different style.
DESU, I’ve only handled a leica once, but I really liked it, and it’d be nice to be able to pick up some gigs on the side and help defray the costs.
>>4483480
The temptation is definitely real. I know it’d make more sense to buy Sony or canikon and get hybrid options, good autofocus, etc, but I just want the rangefinder.
Been watching too many Cam Mackey videos, I guess. Shows that you can get nice portrait/fashion editorial style shots with full manual and now I’m feeling the vibe. Also the little itty bitty lenses are very appealing compared to the new Nikon stuff, optical perfection or not

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Nov 2025 23:15:12 No.4484749 Report

Quoted By:

>X-pro 2 + 35mm 1.4
Or
>m240 + 50mm Voigtlander

Fuji package is half the price, but it’s aps-c, but you do get autofocus
Leica would be $2500 for the combo, but FF, M-mount so all lenses are usable forever, and I kinda like using manual focus
Use would be for travel, portraits, and maybe fashion/influencer photography, I know some people at my gym.

Only real downside of Leica is spending that much money up front, and needing a whole second camera to shoot sports or action. Granted, the x-pro autofocus probably isn’t up to the task for that either

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Nov 2025 08:01:34 No.4484816 Report

Quoted By:

>>4481820
>>4481821
Got em

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Nov 2025 14:45:57 No.4484833 Report

Quoted By:

>>4481813
imagine living somewhere you can't go try one for yourself and decide. couldn't be me

153KiB, 961x1678, y_0.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 25 Nov 2025 22:55:42 No.4484740 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4484762 >>4484766

What's a good way to discover photographers you like, including dead ones? Is Pinterest good?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Nov 2025 00:21:45 No.4484762 Report

Quoted By: >>4484823

>>4484740
>What's a good way to discover photographers you like, including dead ones?
Go to a used book store or your university's library (even if you aren't a student you can get a library card as a member of the public) and borrow photography books. Find something with a focus on historical periods in photography, scenes and movements, or specific photographers. Even if you get one book that is overall on a subject that, after you turn the final page, you have no affection for, you may return it or put it back on your bookshelf at least knowing where you'd like to point your nose next, since you may find an allusion to another photographer or style outside the scope of the book you just read.
>Is Pinterest good?
Maybe. I like Flickr. Tumblr probably has some blogs you might like and there is a hashtag system so you can jump down some rabbit holes there. This is a queer suggestion but pbase and goat.vision are great resources for viewing sample galleries of specific cameras or lenses, not so much for finding specific photographers though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Nov 2025 01:08:25 No.4484766 Report

Quoted By:

>>4484740
Reading.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Nov 2025 10:41:19 No.4484823 Report

Quoted By:

>>4484762
+I highly recommend to brief review of each book you read. take a picture of the cover or the most representative picture and write one or two lines of your impression about that book or the photographer.
Trust me, it will give you in the future such great insightful database that any other meme youtuber's bullshit reviews could never give.
This trick applies to pretty much everything in life though.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Threads by latest replies - Page 11

On these archives

Your latest searches

/rpt/ - Recent Photo Thread

Astrophotograpgy

Did porn look better on film?

Andres Serrano