Posting all his series.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4483069 >Mexican intellectuals Anonymous
LMAO most of this is just edgy shit. Technical skill really doesn't matter if it's ugly>but that's the point
Anonymous
>>4489589 >Technical skill really doesn't matter Subjectfag filtered
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4490275 Who wants to look at this horrid trash? Staging blood cult ritual slop isn't a real skill and all this appeals to is edgelords and pedo elites.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4483261 The Klansmen looked based though.
If it is pleasurable, why is kitsch considered worthless?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4479974 >go to a social gathering >walk around starting conversations in front of ppl but only start with some inside humor that 3 ppl get, then never tell anyone what the fuck you're talking about. >come away thinking the three people who recognize your reference bc they saw it too are the only ones who "get you" >everyone gets that you're a passive-aggressive asipe who has no idea how socializing works outside your own self-absorbed head no one will ever want to bang you doing shit like that anons
Anonymous
>>4487023 exactly the point, your parents hate you by the time you're 7, and by middle age you don't give a fuck about the details of your great grandfathers pointless life. No one has any reason to give a fuck about you, if you're living for other people, you might as well end it now bc in 3 quick generations no one will be left alive with any living memory of your existence. You'll be as interesting to humanity as some random shoemaker was in the 1300s.
Better find a fucking purpose in life, bc if it's breeding your way to relevancy like a dimwitted suburban housewife, that is absolutely nothing.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4487031 oh look its the angry liberal, this time telling us why he’s so angry
>the grapes are sour anyways and anything people used to do and think is for idiots Humans are the only thing that is economically and philosophically real. Everything else is made up by humans. Gold has no value. History has no value. Only dynasty even comes close to being true. Cloning yourself to maintain an empire.
You only think reproduction is pointless because you have convinced yourself to own nothing and possibly even that ownership is bad.
The people who instilled these values in you believe the complete opposite and take reproduction as a form of cloning so seriously that they are highly inbred to the point of having unique genetic disorders and use genital mutilation to differentiate themselves from what they own. And that what, is quite a lot, including you.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4487031 >theres a massive tribe following the exact words of a long dead patriarch >actually multiple tribes but only one that’s very public about it >huge fucking organizations that are just kids working with the success and philosophy of their father, everywhere >everything that is influential in the world is just the children of some guy, doing business with his wealth and wishes in hand >YOUR KIDS WILL HATE YOU, MAKE IT INTO MEDIA AND DIE CHILDLESS! Mmmmm sure
Have as many kids as abraham if you want to be relevant k bb?
Anonymous
I have been contemplating buying a real camera for years, but never managed to figure out which camera and which lense to get.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4491005 That still leaves me with hundreds of camera + lense combinations
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4491001 >recommendations of only cameras that are not in production anymore I have never purchased a new body, don't think I've ever bought a new lens either. Saved me an absolute shit load of money and never had an issue and I bought a decent amount of stuff.
Anonymous
>>4491001 It's not that hard
Figure out what specs and features and performance goals you want or need
Figure out your budget
Figure out which models you like using by going to a store and actually trying them, or renting
Taking longer than a few days is just your autism
Anonymous
>>4491030 If its not hard why won't they help me
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4491035 If you want help, post two things in your next response without complaining:
How much money you have to spend
AND
What you want to take photos of.
I will give you three different setups and budgets to buy directly off of ebay
Quoted By:
He starts his day with his beautiful photographic tool, prepared the night before in hopeful anticipation of a day full of visual wonder. Every lens, camera, and sometimes film, combination explored in his mind for the plethora of scenic possibilities that may confront him during the day at hand. He awakes, proudly slinging his camera du jour, venturing to a local café where he may map out his “photo walk”.
Anonymous
>>4491015 Could be. Basically he is shitting all over a fictional person who despite owning nice things deals with existential dread. Would not having anything be better?
Anonymous
>>4491016 Let me scare OP for a second. Ahem...
I spent $5000 on camera equipment in the last year and I take medicore snapshits of my walks and cons I visit.
I have enough wealth where even if I lit that money on fire instead I would be comfortable and only mildly annoyed.
Instead I have excellent top-grade modern lenses paired with a capable full frame body that I still take with me despite weighing more than 500 grams.
I bet his dick flew off reading that
Anonymous
>>4491019 >spends 5000 dollhairs on gear that could have just been shot on a phone wow what a chad u owned OP for sure
Anonymous
>>4491022 >spending money bad Why own a car anon when you can just walk everywhere
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4491029 Yes definitely never buy a new car
Quoted By:
Which camera bag do you currently own?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
On a related topic, I'm tired of these pleather lens pouches that start to flake whenever you actually start using them, like pic rel. Any tips for replacement?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4487599 I have the 350-II, holds my Zf, Z50II, 180-600, 28, 35, 105, 50, and 28-400 with extra batteries, tripod, and pocket light...
Anonymous
There are simply too many bags. We need 3, maybe 4 bags at most.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4490826 I have a dozen now, it's getting out of hand. Some are leftovers from when I was working in commercial photography but I don't want to get rid of them either.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
peak design insert in a jansport, I really can't see myself needing anything bigger or "better"
Quoted By:
Snoybob Edition
Anonymous
Silly question, but what's the point of getting an adapter and using vintage lenses on modern DSLRs?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4489595 different lenses have different aberrations, and older ones have more, and some people like the look of some of those
extremely swirly bokeh is one look people like that is typically designed out of modern lenses
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Dafuq is up with the battery life on my Leica D-lux 4? Am I doing something wrong? Is it defective?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I asked chatgpt to recommend me a camera, considering I never had a real camera, but want a great one nonetheless.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Someone teach me about TTL
Quoted By:
I'm looking for my first real camera. I had no idea where to start so I had a look at the image properties of my wedding pictures (which I though were pretty great) to know what camera the photographer used.
cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE
>>4490793 It's just marketing because if your cards are reasonably fresh then the risk is virtually zero on the card side, and on the camera side if it bricks one it bricks two. Just cycle cards along the event if you're so worried.
Anonymous
>>4490795 >it's not an issue because you can swap cards and only lose half the days images, no biggie You sure sound like a pro
cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE
>>4490797 >it's an issue because even if it guarantees nothing the shills told me it'd prevent me from losing everything It's a game of odds and dual card barely slants them in your favor at all, as opposed to the other alternatives I mentioned
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4490799 >again, it's totally fine if you only lose half your images Very convincing
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4490797 It's extremely unlikely that you'll irrecoverably loose photos on one card but not on the other. What's WAY likelier is that you'll just no longer be able to write to the card and you'll maybe loose a couple photos that are stuck in the buffer. Dual cards don't even necessarily save you from that, I've had D750 get stuck on card write error instead of dynamically switching the the backup card, as it would've if it was an actual safety feature and not a marketing gimmick.
Quoted By:
is this set a good choice for my first camera? Is this type of lense multipurpose? since initially I will only have one lense
Anonymous
>>4490738 Sup cANON you meme loving fuck
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4490734 The R6III has probably moved less than 100 units by now so there's zero chance anyone here has one yet.
That being said you can probably make some basic assumptions about it: It's a moderately high-res FSI sensor with a slighty faster readout speed than the R6II (like 10% faster woo). It's basically the same as the Mark II except it'll be a bit worse in low light and a bit better when cropping / printing very large. That's about it.
The lens however I use somewhat regularly and it's alright. Emphasis on 'alright' and not 'good' or 'great'. It's main plusses are that it's small, light, and cheap. The slow apeture sucks on the long end and I rarely use it beyond 70mm where it starts at f5.6. It relies heavily on distortion correction that cannot be turned off especially at the 24-28mm zone, where it has mechanical vignetting (bad). I use it as my travel snapshit lens and that's it. It's convenient.
If you're hell bent on an R6 (any Mark), I would suggest getting either the RF 24-105 f/4L IS which is heavier and like 2x the price OR getting two primes like the RF 35mm f/1.8 and RF 85mm f/2.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4490751 Any camera and just a preset you like on important
Any camera and spend a day learning how to do basic adjustments so that way you can make food pictures regardless of the camera you use
All brands have lots of internal JPG options, but if you're willing to go through the work to set those up how you like, might as well just do that on the backend
>>4490665 What will happen instead is you'll spend hours finding and tweaking the right in-camera settings
Enjoy looking back at the pictures you take and disliking how they are edited once your taste changes
cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE
Quoted By:
>>4490758 >if someone notices Fuji is the only reason Sony can't claim the worst brand in the market award it must be cANON! kek, to be a fujislug or sonygger is to cope.
