>>4398159You can convert stills edits from programs that support exporting edits as ICC like capture one into LUTS
So take a photo of a scene under a specific illuminant (ie: orange sunset, red sunset, purple sunset, warm daylight, cool daylight, cloudy, shade), edit that to your taste in C1, export all color edits as ICC and convert to LUT. Wala you just made your own canned color grading ie: fujifeel-warmdaylight.lut.
I know for sure lattice supports icc->lut conversion
https://videovillage.com/lattice/Sadly this isn't a replacement for shooting raw in stills because most cameras worth using process their video far better than their stills (if its oversampled from the whole sensor to 8mp they better)
>>4398177>Be filmcuck>Slosh some toxic waste around for 20 minutes>put your photos under a digital camera capable of resolving all the detail in the photo>take a picture of your picture>essentially just applying a LUT to your digital camera with extra steps (you could match a standard shot to a film scan and make a LUT that way lmao)And then you progress to film schizoing with impractical mp claims requiring $10k of gear and rambling about how its more real as if film has never been edited, and then saying its not interpreted or mangled by muh algorithms despite being a trichrome, and then... finally... buying a fuji, becuase all you have left is "i like turning dials and having a camera thats silver and black" lolololol.
