Quoted By: >>4391417
>sees someone overdosing on fentanyl
*SNAP*
Why are street photographers like this?
*SNAP*
Why are street photographers like this?
Threads by latest replies - Page 12
Anybody see any value in this, or is it the photography equivalent of a TikTok dance craze?
Quoted By:
Scumbag Snoy
Quoted By:
Quoted By: >>4391146
I can only find film from 1988/89 for this camera. Is it worth taking a gamble buying a 16 dollar roll? Not really into photography but after some shitty photographs when I’m out with friends.
Quoted By:
Noob here. How did a Playstation gaming company dethrone all the legacy camera companies?
Was it because the move to mirrorless was the perfect catalyst to leverage their electronics tech knowhow?
Was it because the move to mirrorless was the perfect catalyst to leverage their electronics tech knowhow?
Quoted By: >>4388247
Retard here, I'm trying to fix up my camera settings so it stops being so fucking blurry in close-ups, which is something that's been plaguing it even in ideal lighting. Please bear in mind that I'm an amateur photographer.
I'm going to upload some photos directly. from my camera so the EXIF data should automatically transfer over. The first will be in "auto" mode and has a noticable red filter that idk how to get rid of, the second will be with "Easy Mode" turned on
I'm going to upload some photos directly. from my camera so the EXIF data should automatically transfer over. The first will be in "auto" mode and has a noticable red filter that idk how to get rid of, the second will be with "Easy Mode" turned on
144KiB, 1080x969, 0e5d645c6b05bc703d3bfca684f4220b8348986ab34e5985804fec237bef4be5_1~2.jpg
Quoted By:
Send here more Walter White memes please
Quoted By: >>4391159
>BRB. just the biggest upgrade (cheat mode unlock) you can make to your photography skills.
Yet, it's ignored by noobs and seasoned hobbyists somehow.
Yet, it's ignored by noobs and seasoned hobbyists somehow.
Quoted By: >>4386210
Micro contrast is not real. 3D pop is not real.
Well, they may be real phenomena of an image, but they are not imparted by certain lenses due to certain optical designs.
Anyone who supports the idea of 3D pop, Zeiss pop, or micro contrast is an anti-science luddite or a grifter.
Watch any of these people try to explain what 3D pop or micro contrast is and their bullshit is self evident. If a phenomenon cannot be described using scientific language and measured objectively, it isn't real.
Every time you see an A/B test for 3D pop or microcontrast, the tester is using different camera bodies, or the composition is different, the color grade is different, different exposure levels or the lighting has changed.
The only other area that has so much peasant level superstition has got to be pro audio.
Well, they may be real phenomena of an image, but they are not imparted by certain lenses due to certain optical designs.
Anyone who supports the idea of 3D pop, Zeiss pop, or micro contrast is an anti-science luddite or a grifter.
Watch any of these people try to explain what 3D pop or micro contrast is and their bullshit is self evident. If a phenomenon cannot be described using scientific language and measured objectively, it isn't real.
Every time you see an A/B test for 3D pop or microcontrast, the tester is using different camera bodies, or the composition is different, the color grade is different, different exposure levels or the lighting has changed.
The only other area that has so much peasant level superstition has got to be pro audio.
