Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
Threads by latest replies - Page 12
Anonymous
Quoted By:
How do you sell a photo for over a million dollars?
Anonymous
>>4482685 >>4482683 >just go be a politician The thing is people don't have to listen to your impotent crying. Muh beauty is something different to everyone until a set of shared values aka ideology lends it objective weight.
Anonymous
>>4482698 Faggot go on a hike.
Anonymous
>>4482708 You can't build anything on primordial force, if so then top predator animals would have kingdoms, and they do not
Anonymous
>>4482708 >implying "go on a hike" is an insult kek
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482727 As if kingdoms were built by fags like you and not warriors. Even if it was true what's your point ? Are you happier than cats or owls ?
>>4482839 Based retard, read between the lines you've missed the point
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Do you develop and scan your own film or send it off to someone else? AT what point doe it become worth it to develop your own rolls rather than sending it to someone else?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I send my film to a local shop, they charge me only $1.5 (Colour)/$4 (B/W) and $6 for scanning (36 exp.) or $0.2 (colour)/$0.4 (B/W) for each print. I want to try to self develop my own film but the consumables are sometimes a bit difficult to get or quite expensiven in my country.
Anonymous
>$35 AUD to dev and scan one (1) roll of black and white film >Colour film cheaper to dev and scan (@ $29 per roll) but is counteracted by the fact colour film costs the difference so it's not any cheaper actually >a set of 6x4 prints is an extra $8 (wow le poverty size prints woo) >doesn't offer larger prints >they're just fucking digital prints of the scan >Okay it's like $8-12 a roll for black and white film if you buy in lots of 5/10. That's alright >Oh look there's these black and white films designed specifically to use C41 developement so you can use the cheaper colour printing we offer! >C41 black and white film is $25 a roll AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Anonymous
>>4482738 >$35 AUD What city?
Go somewhere else or learn how to do it yourself. $35 is a scam
Anonymous
>>4482740 >What city? Sydney. Granted I've only spoken to two shops, so my data might be skewed.
>Go somewhere else or learn how to do it yourself. $35 is a scam Yes I am
>>4482315 anon and am in the process of DIY.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482743 I am in Melbounre, irohas photo are quick and cheap, scans the same day
ikigai film lab do better scans but you pay more for it (you also can't pick up the negs, post only) , and the bloke is a bit of nutcase on ig
Anonymous
Why has the world abandoned photo shoots of good looking women? 99% of anything I see now is selfies and if its a photoshoot its just to sell clothing or some super generic looking agency testshoot. 10 years ago or whatever the world was full of every good looking girl doing multiple photoshoots just for content. What happened?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4481289 What’s wrong is you quit looking at photography and got lazy and just looked at social media instead. Social media is worse than tabloid trash, it’s DIY tabloid trash. If all you look at is internet shit bc it’s low effort, being on your fuckin phone, then you will make shit inspired by that shit. If you seek to produce work of a higher caliber, then you must seek out sources of inspiration worthy of publishing. Make the god damned effort to get your ass and your things and get the fuck out of here.
But “everyone” I know has told me the future is all internet shit all the time and nothing but internet shit. Only you can choose whether you make that world of shit your entire reality.
Anonymous
>>4481289 Because Fauci and Blden wants women and men to not be attracted to each other anymore unless it’s to politicians or billionaires
And 80% women are so stupid they fell for it
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482436 nothing about schwab or soros or this time?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Buffalo Edition
Please post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.
old thread:
>>4457140 Thread Question: How important is the use of a darkroom to your film photography?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482190 >>4482196 or you can just develop the same, in which case it's called rating, not pushing/pulling
more common with color film which gets color shifts if you change development times
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482196 If he is going -1 it is pulling the film, but you are correct about everything else.
>>4482199 It would be underexposing the film, but then you can compensate for that with extended development time, which is why you get more grain and increased contrast. Most films are just fine with going a stop up or down in exposure with standard dev time although not all. Cheap films like fomapan are already rated about 1 stop higher than they technically should be.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482190 If you want to mess with pushing and pulling film I would recommend trying ilford hp5+. It looks really good shot anywhere from like 12 iso all the way up to 1600 or higher. You just need to develop it correctly.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482196 > and you should shoot the entire roll at this pushed speed. Not to overcomplicate things for the guy that asked, but with black and white technically you can compensate variable iso on the same roll if you use a super dilute stand development, something like one to 100 rodinal or something like that. You get crushed contrast on everything but at least it’s usable. Not that I’d recommend anyone do it intentionally, but if you make that mistake that we all make at some point to change mid roll, then it is recoverable at least.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
PeruAnon here, Feel kinda stuck lately I did some more studio shooting and some nudes (can't share because reasons) but I feel like documentary work is still my way to go However, I feel like I'm on the verge of getting better but can't see where I need to improve in my photography for this to happen Anyone here, who has seen my work over time, with some advice?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
How does /p/ feel about zines? They seem fun. You print your stuff, distribute it however you want, and people look at it. They might toss it in the trash but at least you made an impression. You can make them for pretty cheap. I made some lo-fi DIY-style ones with my visual art at home using just an inkjet printer, and I've been dropping them in random places for people to find. Anyone ever make zines?
Anonymous
>>4482374 >And no information for the rest. Then send them RGB. If they're a modern print shop at all worth their salt, they'll know how to best print your RGB on their printer/paper combo.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>4482387 Oh, nice to know, thanks anon.
>The same color can appear slightly different on different media due to the physical composition of the paper. > All files must be sent in CMYK (cyan, magenta, yellow and black), with a Fogra 39 color profile. > Any images that are sent in RGB or PANTONE colors will be automatically converted using a standard separation profile. Maybe I'll look for another printing service.
Anonymous
>>4482402 Ah, is it offset printing? Are you getting a run that's big enough where that's worth it?
Either way, if you can get your hands on that specific profile, you can use it for soft proofing at home, but remember that there's never a guarantee that what you see on your screen will be equivalent to your prints.
If don't need so many copies, inkjet printing might be cheaper.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482505 >If don't need so many copies, inkjet printing might be cheaper. I was thinking about 100 copies.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
If it's wrong, why is it so good?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4473816 >>4473212 >>4473207 Who are these retards that don’t put a maximum on iso, I shoot P and it’s great every time , when things are fast put it on S, manual mode is for dorks who want to make things harder for themselves for no reason other than ‘I’m a pro now’. P does better than you
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4473212 Retard if you're gonna post Yoshitoshi ABe on /p/ you have to post the drawings with the SMEGMA
>FOVEON WON Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4478172 Eletronic viewfinder.
He's trying to say he's better than you cause he uses a small lens to focus.
Anonymous
For me, it's gotta be Snap Distance Priority Mode. Ricoh Chads rise up!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482474 Real Ricoh chads use af-s with the shutter set to snap on full press, rather than dedicated snap mode, for the best of both worlds
Anonymous
Have any of you working/professional anons had any luck becoming a "high end" photographer/videographer? By which I mean, the kind of person who only works with more discerning, high-paying clients? I run a business that does sound and video recording for classical and jazz musicians (there's some photography in there too) and whilst my skills are pretty good, I've realised that I will never make good money or work make truly great recordings until I get better quality clients. It's not just about money, but rather the willingness and ability of these clients to work under the conditions needed to make a good product, whilst also respecting my work enough to actually cooperate. I've realised half of the issue is just price. Doubling prices has helped get rid of the bad clients however the issue with "high-end" clients is that they are usually rich people who do not live in my shitty area and therefore don't know me. I know full well that a facebook ad will not fix this. I haven't been here in a while so pardon me if this is a faggish question to answer, but last time I was here there was a decent number of current or former professionals.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Is anyone else noticing a big drop in engagement on flickr over the last year or 2? I know its dropped alot since its peak, but it feels like its significantly dropped again over the last year or so.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4479479 >>4481604 This sums it up pretty much.
The only channels still alive are the ones of influencers who get free shit to review and market their lightroom presets. I think humanity is steering to a new trend of less media intake. Truning off phone notifications, no X, no insta. I believe at some point fine art, laid back galleries, craftmanship gonna thrive again. Not in the sense of getting thousands likes but to showcase you as a person to few selected people that care. Not commercialized, not for the money but out of love and passion. In the end for everyone it's much more fullfilling. It's natural and it's human unlike social media like used in the last decade.
Anonymous
We need to cause some kind of an offline revolution desu. Or a campaign against smartphones at the very least. Make the internet a physical location you visit again. Fuck the Thielites and the megacorpos and what theyre doing to humanity. At this rate we'll be some Eloi pet in a generation or two.
Anonymous
>>4482293 IMO*. No idea why is autocorrected to Desu.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482294 /p/ has a couple of autocorrects like s o y > based
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4481603 >people abusing groups for a certain lens/camera model/topic Yep, like when I wanted to look at the K-3 III group’s photos and got blasted with hundreds of pics from some F1 race day or when I looked at the gallery for some PowerShot and it was, literally, all bus pics from some autist in England somewhere. Please learn to share the gallery space.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Your photo must be at least 5 years old. If you are new to photography - share the oldest you got.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4481712 This is exactly the kind of shot that would have impressed begging me
Anonymous
2013 or 2014
>>4479412 best pic on /p/ rn
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482305 Same with this one
Anonymous
Anonymous
Got this Osmo for a decent price, is it good for vlogging?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477692 You bought it, literally just try it. No one knows your quality requirements or conditions but I would say yes. Gimbal stabilized footage is much better to watch than the clowns who try to use their dSLR type cameras, even ones with S-tier stabilization like Panasonic and Olympus, for vlogging. But if you are shooting in available light in dark conditions it is not going to look good.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
You couldn't have gotten a worse camera.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4477692 Whats the point in asking how good something is after you've already bought it?
The person best placed your question is you.