/p/ - Photography

103KiB, 768x512, A_casual_photo_of_Korean_girl_.jpg

Skirts too short on glass chiar

Meli Nom Sun 01 Jun 2025 00:49:33 No.4431486 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

Skirts always too short on glass chair and cannot be put under bum. Under glass is a view nobody wants to show. How to fix?

2MiB, 720x1280, 1716324331370090.mp4

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

/fpg/ - foodie photography general

Anonymous Mon 14 Apr 2025 18:17:18 No.4422403 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4422421 >>4422552 >>4423520

8 posts and 8 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1723637535083905.jpg, 143KiB, 1080x1350

Anonymous Mon 14 Apr 2025 18:32:54 No.4422414 Report

Quoted By:

Welcome to the Frantzén world.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Apr 2025 20:06:19 No.4422421 Report

Quoted By:

>>4422403
Vomitspit
https://youtu.be/_JUpTOFJUTU?feature=shared

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 26 Apr 2025 10:27:50 No.4422552 Report

Quoted By:

>>4422403
>literally no difference

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1743664027988577.jpg, 132KiB, 1080x1350

Anonymous Wed 30 Apr 2025 14:47:13 No.4423520 Report

Quoted By:

>>4422403

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO PICT0892.jpg, 4MiB, 2587x1720

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 18:28:38 No.4431329 Report

Quoted By:

burg

158KiB, 1024x683, 49069129772_ed6cefd981_b.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

/fgt/ F5 Edition

Anonymous Tue 13 May 2025 05:07:13 No.4426713 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

This is the Film General Thread. Post your film photos or film gear questions in this thread.
What is the best film camera ever made, and why is it the Nikon F5?

331 posts and 121 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 May 2025 03:49:39 No.4430065 Report

Quoted By: >>4430072

>>4430052
i suck

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 May 2025 04:17:30 No.4430072 Report

Quoted By:

>>4430065
You just haven't found inspiration yet!

If you want an idea for a project you can choose something simple that you like an object, idea, or subject and try to take 6 unique pictures of whatever that thing is.

Consider doing studio shots as well as shots in the wild. Just have fun with it and see how they come out!

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 May 2025 08:54:34 No.4430097 Report

Quoted By:

>>4429147
nta, but im the leicafag you replied to first
shooting kodak gold at f8 and 1/500 for most bright scenes

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 16:25:45 No.4431297 Report

Quoted By: >>4431307

bokeh is gay

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 17:13:50 No.4431307 Report

Quoted By:

>>4431297
just like your mom
lmao

119KiB, 634x634, 204f18ea9ade284368d51583b071c08f--camera-angle-bad-picture-1405798377.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Portraits by bad photographers

Anonymous Thu 22 May 2025 15:23:55 No.4428773 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4428797 >>4431252

What do you do when a retard is taking a group photo, as expected of fucking retards he's aiming from a low angle that makes you stare down sleepy or delete your chin? What do you do when lighting is right above you and makes the muscles of your face look like those of a gremlin? Is the only solution to strike a retarded Jojo pose?

2MiB, 1804x1000, IMG_7639-Enhanced-NR.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

/rpt/ - Recent Photo Thread

Anonymous Mon 19 May 2025 02:52:28 No.4427935 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

Creepshot edition.

282 posts and 152 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 May 2025 20:13:56 No.4430270 Report

Quoted By:

>>4428606
Glad to see /p/ hasn't changed in the 6 years I haven't been here. You're a total retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 May 2025 20:16:26 No.4430271 Report

Quoted By:

>>4428897
>>4428898
Do you have any more like this? could be a fun series.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 May 2025 19:20:42 No.4430842 Report

Quoted By: >>4431251

>>4427968
Banding/10

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 May 2025 19:46:01 No.4430848 Report

Quoted By:

>>4428931
Looks like Dragon's Dogma

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 12:06:17 No.4431251 Report

Quoted By:

>>4430842
That's just jaypeg compression

3MiB, 1600x1200, photo.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 30 May 2025 23:05:51 No.4431121 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4431122 >>4431244

i tried editing this photo i took to make it look similar to tarkovsky's cinematography/some of the scenes seen in stalker (1979). plz lmk how u think i could improve it to make it look better

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 May 2025 23:10:03 No.4431122 Report

Quoted By:

>>4431121
Ask ai to make you a profile you can simply apply to your images.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 11:25:46 No.4431244 Report

Quoted By:

>>4431121
this is not bad, but in my memory of watching the movie restored in theater, the highlights weren't as crushed (though they were slightly), and it was overall a bit brighter
Contrast is pretty good; I don't know if I'd bother by adding sunflares or negative effects, the poor man suffered enough to make his movie, lets try to copy the intended parts and get in his head (Georgy Rerberg's head actually, he's responsible for a lot and I mean a lot lot)

Yours looks more like a Stalker cliché, which leans a bit towards the video game vibes rather than the movie's

2MiB, 720x1280, RAW.webm

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 03 May 2025 00:24:52 No.4424166 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

>2025
>still shooting RAW
>spend hours post process editing every single photo on a computer
Why?

226 posts and 22 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 May 2025 23:56:24 No.4431132 Report

Quoted By: >>4431152

>>4431129
I mean OM1 and OM3 have a BSI stacked sensors and better autofocus. The handheld high res mode in the OM3 and OM1ii have a 14bit raw setting which is literally the same as most full frame for static objects. There's no need to meltdown over this buddy. No ones forcing you to buy MFT if you don't want to. I was only saying the OM3 and Ricoh GRiii are pretty good for Fuji shooting without wasting money on Fuji. You really can't go wrong with any of those cameras though.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO ishygddt.jpg, 20KiB, 400x400

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 00:11:10 No.4431140 Report

Quoted By:

>buying a tiny sensor camera
>body isn't even smaller than the average APS-C

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 01:02:33 No.4431152 Report

Quoted By: >>4431201

>>4431132
>its the same as full frame this time i swear to god its the same i swear to god i finally purchased a camera that is as good as a full frame camera!
You are nuts, buddy. It has never worked like that. It's a gimmick that produces watercolor painting ass quality over 4 shot. Maybe if you're lucky with a middling setting, it's almost as good as aps-c with a shit lens, but it's never actually been as good as just using a better camera.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 06:05:36 No.4431201 Report

Quoted By:

>>4431152
Lol I can tell you've never used it. Either way there isn't a full frame camera with a Fuji like experience. Nikon ZF is close but not quite there.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO hq720.jpg, 54KiB, 686x386

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 08:10:30 No.4431221 Report

Quoted By:

>>4431013
After owning both I take the X-T5 anyday over the A7C(II).
>good viewfinder
>body feels nice in hand
>with the small fuji lenses it's overall much lighter
>files that are easy to work on in LR
>film sims to work on as a base in LR
>nice, quiet shutter sound

I'm just not a big fan of aps-c sensor size. If you are into pixel peeping you gonna notice worse IQ. But on Insta or even on my wall no one gonna see a difference. But the real chad move is to buy the X-E4 or soon X-E5 to have something really small for edc. Also don't use muh classic neg filter. ClassicChrome is the real thing and add some color saturation, increase blacks and that's it.

651KiB, 814x559, 135.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Why did the 135mm fall out of favor?

Anonymous Sat 24 May 2025 02:07:58 No.4429230 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

If you handle any amount of film-era camera gear you will almost always find a 135mm when buying somebody's old kit. It seems to me like it was the second most popular focal length after 50mm. So why is it that almost nobody cares about 135mm today?

15 posts and 1 image omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 May 2025 01:33:43 No.4429443 Report

Quoted By: >>4429538

>>4429441
it is

maybe try imitating liberal talking points and complaining about "antivaxxers" on reddit because art might be too hard for you to de-abstract

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 May 2025 10:31:09 No.4429538 Report

Quoted By:

>>4429437
>>4429438
>>4429441
>>4429443
Both of you are degenerates

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Carrière,_Portrait_d'Elsa (...).jpg, 64KiB, 382x488

Anonymous Tue 27 May 2025 23:54:20 No.4430335 Report

Quoted By: >>4430336

>>4429336
>85 says you are a purist
>135 says you are using the same gear you did on film
...so both are purists?
Take a nap, kiddo

>>4429438
>and the only well defined thing in that painting were a nostril.
Happens, you just don't know art, pal

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 May 2025 23:58:07 No.4430336 Report

Quoted By:

>>4430335
the eyes are well defined there though

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Sigma-90mm-F2.8-DG-DN-3.wm.75ec8 (...).jpg, 26KiB, 640x465

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 02:11:06 No.4431160 Report

Quoted By:

>>4429246
This.
Sigma had the right idea with its cute i series 90mm f2.8. I always have it with me because it packs up so nicely.
Sigma-dono, plz expand the i series with a 115 or 135mm f2.8, or f4 for all I care. Just make it nice to pack.

4MiB, 4032x3024, IMG_2292.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

K13 Fri 30 May 2025 13:18:02 No.4430990 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4431131

How do you like this photo?

5 posts omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1726326614843727.jpg, 148KiB, 2048x1118

Anonymous Fri 30 May 2025 23:54:14 No.4431131 Report

Quoted By: >>4431141 >>4431146 >>4431147

>>4430990
What is there to like? It's a generic car on a generic road in generic woods. What are you trying to tell? Why did you take this picture? Car is clearly your subject and you placed it on thirds lines, but why did you place it behind trees? You're supposed to attract attention to it, not away from it.
>Lack of DoF
It's an interesting concept, but you have to use it right. Here we see millions of leaves, why? It makes eyes wander until they begin to hurt.
>How do you like photo
It's lame, if I saw it on social media, I wouldn't even notice it. It's the scene you saw IRL on your way home from work and forgot about it a second later.

For starters, try something like this. Find a good colourful spot, shoot long shutter and try to follow a car. Try to get it right with a colorful car

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 00:13:45 No.4431141 Report

Quoted By: >>4431157

>>4431131
If bill gates was a car guy this could have been the windows xp wallpaper.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 00:16:30 No.4431146 Report

Quoted By:

>>4431131
Dude blur LMAO

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 00:18:51 No.4431147 Report

Quoted By: >>4431157

>>4431131
ChatGPT generate a car with motion blur, ultra saturation

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 01:46:11 No.4431157 Report

Quoted By:

>>4431141
You are absolutely right, it's not a masterpiece, not even close. But it follows a lot of good photography rules. This is common with stock photography in general. They tend to be bland, but somewhat well shot.

>>4431147
I have no idea, you are probably right about AI origin, but I don't care, you can do something similar with camera. The point was about using blur to create something in a boring environment.

1MiB, 1500x1000, miku 1.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Figurine Thread

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2024 22:51:47 No.4317399 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By: >>4430845

Feel free to dump any figurine images you got.
Here are a few of mine.

257 posts and 154 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 May 2025 19:28:45 No.4430845 Report

Quoted By:

>>4317399
>Thread created 05/25/24(Sat)18:51:47
It's now May 2025.
Shit. What a thread. Been going on for more than a year and even persisted through a 4chan hack.
Good job everybody.

>>4427057
That's a good point, /p/ really should have a higher image limit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 May 2025 01:45:44 No.4430928 Report

Quoted By: >>4431006

>>4419559
>>4419563
I did end up getting the flash and it's nice though I'm still struggling with figuring out how to know which settings to use and how to angle it and all that.
https://files.catbox.moe/wu8mon.JPG
Used fill flash and had to set exposure compensation to like -2 and the flash power itself to like -1.3 stops or something to preserve the ambiance. I assume it's just something you gotta figure out from practice. Half my pics ended up with the flash comin out too powerfully onto the fig

Clueless Faggot !LUYtbm.JAw

Clueless Faggot !LUYtbm.JAw Fri 30 May 2025 14:26:57 No.4431006 Report

Quoted By: >>4431136

>>4430928
>I did end up getting the flash and it's nice though I'm still struggling with figuring out how to know which settings to use and how to angle it and all that.
Flashs are great but generally the light they apply is very harsh. Indoors you can do a thing called bounce flash, where you basically full power it and aim it at a ceiling or adjacent wall.
If that's not an option or you are outdoors, look into buying a softbox. They're cheap and will it will help keep the flash from making the lighting look so artificial.
Play with your WB as well if you find the bright white look to be less appealing than a warm tone. You can also look into flash gels.
>Half my pics ended up with the flash comin out too powerfully onto the fig
Sounds like a metering problem? Set metering to partial or spot if your subject (the figurine) only takes up a 1/2 or less than the frame; your camera is trying to meter for the background. Is the flash using E-TTL?

Also,
Why are you catboxing a JPEG? Even 6000x4000, 4:4:4 90JPEG compression photos fit under 5MB here.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 00:05:07 No.4431136 Report

Quoted By:

>>4431006
the thread hit the image limit so I had to link it through catbox. I'm using a softbox and yeah I had it on ettl and was using matrix metering.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 31 May 2025 00:14:11 No.4431142 Report

Quoted By:

Maybe it's time for a new thread, nothing wrong with that, and fig photography definitely is 4chan core.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Threads by latest replies - Page 12

On these archives

Your latest searches

Skirts too short on glass chiar

/fpg/ - foodie photography general

/fgt/ F5 Edition

Portraits by bad photographers

/rpt/ - Recent Photo Thread

Why did the 135mm fall out of favor?

Figurine Thread