>>4493597 contFor 35mm, got a 15mm, 28mm f2.0 ,35 f2.8 PC, 50mm 1.4, 85mm f1.2mm and 28-85mm zeiss in CY Mount, used to own a 200mm f3.5 Zeiss and 180mmf3.4 Angenuiex. The Zeiss zoom and their 200 mm are okay but kind of underwhelming for the price, the 180mm f3.4 I regret selling.
For Canon, I have the 24-105 ii, the 24-70 2.8 ii, 70-200 f2.8 ii, 200mm f1.8 ii, 1.4X iii, 2X ii, and the 300mmf2.0 and 600mm f4.0 pair of Nikkors with adapters. The 200 mm Canon is amazingly sharp and nice to use, just heavy as hell. Nearly 4 kg, it must be solid metal and glass inside and it has almost useless tripod foot so I bought one from really right stuff that you can use as a palm holder. The two Nikkors are very heavy especially the 600. The 300 I can just barely use on a monopod or propped up on a stump. It has an interchangeable PL mount for Motion Pictures and I have loaned it out for that. It produces beautiful dramatic silhouettes, it was used in the final long shot at the end of Indiana Jones and the Last crusade. I have an amazing photograph of a bighorn sheep in Northern British Columbia I got with it it was on a magazine cover.
I find I've been doing a lot of snap shitting with my Canon 6D Mark II, as I tend to use the zooms and it makes me lazy and not really want to find a great vantage point rather than just framing the subject with the zoom.
For Hasselblad, I have a 500 C/M, a 903 SWC, 50mm f4 FLE, 60mmf3.5, 80mm f2.8 chrome Tstar, 100mm 3.5, 120mm f4 Macro, 250mm f5.6 chrome, 250mm f5.6 SA, and a 1000mm f5.6 Zeiss with its Rollei mount
I keep thinking I wanted gfx but I'm still disappointed with Contax and Hasselblad shitting the bed on their first attempts at the digital Market. Both of them needed you to buy their new lens mounts for old lens designs. Absolute bullshit.
21MM 2.8 zeiss in Canon mount is my only DSLR lens fixed focal length I own
As much as I like fuji, I find they're ergonomics on there cameras a bit puzzling.
