Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 4

Astrophotograpgy

No.4408437 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
New thread
235 posts and 89 images omitted

No.4489438 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Been years since I posted here, photo dump.

I made a dead-simple family photo reviewing app for my wife

No.4489605 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
We rate them on the couch together, looking at them on the TV, then I delete the bad ones from our Linux server before sending a big archive to cloud.

We do this process once a year, around new year's.

If anyone is interested, I'll link the github. What other tools would you suggest that have a high WAF "Wife acceptance factor" for this process?

No.4481813 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Give it straight to me, /p/.

Are Leica M cameras a meme? Or are they worth it?
Mainly for portraits, and rock and leaves.
160 posts and 16 images omitted

Andres Serrano

No.4483069 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Posting all his series.

Posting first:
Early Works

(SELECT WORKS)

1984 - 1987
166 posts and 150 images omitted

New to photography

No.4489472 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
So I see some absolutely beautiful sunrises at work this time of year. Realistically what kind of gear would I be looking at to get better than my phone camera (iPhone 14). Not sure on what I’m looking for, but I would also like it to be capable of low light exposure/ night time for aurora. Literally have no idea on what I need and the options available out there are worst than trying to figure out what caliber you need for accuracy out at 300 vs 1,500 yards. Is the iPhone just good enough for my amateur needs?
6 posts and 2 images omitted

No.4482924 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
I shoot black and whit 'art' photos.
I print a lot. So i spend a lot of time looking at the details of each photo. especially if they're hanging on my wall.
that being said, i have a conundrum which, surprisingly, isn't well covered on the internet:

>would you say a leica monochrom, or a medium format (with more bits and more sensor real estate) would produce better black and white images?
275 posts and 22 images omitted
!!fHCyNHgc7RT

!!fHCyNHgc7RT No.4489486 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
>shot using smartphone

C&C plox
4 posts and 4 images omitted

No.4488580 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Continuous LED lights are terrible for photography.
This is an approximate $2400 600watt continuous LED light.
At a distance of 2 meters, it can manage 1/60 iso400 f8 at full power.
That converts to f4.8 iso400 1/200 if you wanted to get up to a barely usable photography shutter speed.
And if you want to go down to iso 100, you are now around f2.8

So $2500 gets you something barely usable on your lowest settings at approx 2 meters, any further distance and it wont work.

And if you want to use any modifier at all its all over and you wont even be able to have enough light for a photo.

In before just shoot at iso 1600, no thanks, im not spending $2400 just to have to use iso1600.
13 posts and 3 images omitted

a buncha old stuff

No.4487074 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
started looking at photos i shot back in 2008-2010ish and decided to do a dump.
107 posts and 98 images omitted