/p/ - Photography

2MiB, 2021x1434, camera.png

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 16:52:38 No.4488831 View View Reply Original Report

I am looking for a first camera, would something like this guarantee significantly better quality pics than Iphone 12, or not at all?

27 posts and 1 image omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_4313.jpg, 4MiB, 5184x3456

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 03:28:36 No.4488903 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488865
Yeah, sensor size and good glass is key.
They suck in low light though.
Buying a mid range DSLR from 2010 or later with a 50mm. f2.0 is a great start, especially since many people drop the hobby after a few months and sell their gear at a loss.

cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE

cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE Thu 18 Dec 2025 03:53:25 No.4488905 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488887
...in favor of the Canon.
Fujifilm is literally the worst digital camera you can buy at a photography store.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 06:49:24 No.4488913 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488852
That's literally my exact gear, which I got as my first 'real' camera somewhat recently. I personally couldn't be happier with my choice. I love the fact that this camera comes with all of the standard pro features, as far as buttons/dials/switches go. The full-frame sensor does some insanely heavy lifting, so even though I had totally fucked up, retarded exposure settings dialed in for much of the first couple thousand photos I took, they were still almost always salvageable.

I've learned quite a bit, but I'm still painfully new and untrained; I don't know for sure if I'm basically on the same level as some retarded soccer mom who gives the camera 5 stars on Amazon because it takes "the best pictures ever", but this definitely seems like a great first camera if you know you're interested in photography and you're capable of growing into it.

It was between this R6 mkii, or an R8 for me. If you have the money to spend, I feel like they're both fantastic choices. Between these two, if you have a smaller budget or aren't totally sure you're into photography, the R8 is great. If you know for sure you're interested in photography, the R6 mkii seems like pretty unbeatable bang for buck that you can grow into for years to come.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 10:53:21 No.4488935 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488831
If you listen to ^them you'll probably use your new professional camera which is practically 10x bigger and heavier than your iphone once or twice and it will never come out of your drawer ever again.

>get a budget
>find cameras look good to you
>it MUST also look you can carry it every fucking where to you
>Is it on the budget?
>yes- buy it
>no- increase your budget or find affordable one that looks good to you

I've seen so many noobs brought canonikon cameras and even snoy A7C and used it only few times because it's too bukly and not convenient to carrying it around

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 12:41:57 No.4488940 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488862
>Pic related was taken with a 2011 camera + 50mm 2.8 macro lens
Which camera though

2MiB, 2592x3872, IMGP2015.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

/digishit/ SOOC JPEGs

Anonymous Sun 26 Oct 2025 10:33:42 No.4477534 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By: >>4488930 >>4488938

contribute
mostly wanted to experiment with the 'natural' setting on the K10D
I think I used -2 saturation, 0 contrast, +1 sharpening but I adjusted it here and there
I also played with color correction in the WB but it wasn't too great

also, /digishit/ general bread

142 posts and 127 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO KING7404.jpg, 3MiB, 3072x2048

Anonymous Sat 06 Dec 2025 00:12:34 No.4486559 Report

Quoted By:

PICTURE STYLE
-1 high/low key adj.
-1 contrast
-2 sharpening

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Dec 2025 09:08:03 No.4486935 Report

Quoted By:

i give it credit anon for making East Maitland out of all places somewhat interesting

needs more rundown Henny Penny joints

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Canon_ixus_front.jpg, 683KiB, 2533x1759

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 10:18:43 No.4488930 Report

Quoted By: >>4488933

>>4477534
Should I nab wunna these lil niggas? I'm torn: on the one hand, the image quality is super flat with no options in-camera to adjust contrast but on the other hand it's a digishit that'll fit in the palm of my hand and I can (almost) pay for it with spare change unlike
>*checks notes*
literally every other 2000s digicam? for some reason.

Wikipedia wanted me to credit this guy LMAO. Nah but, I can respect that.
By Joffboff - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=56389131

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 10:40:00 No.4488933 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488930
If it's like $20 yes, otherwise no.

Also, sort ebay listings by 'for parts'. A lot of cameras listed as broken aren't actually broken and are just missing a battery or something. Hypesters trying to buy digishits aren't smart or brave enough to buy the sketchy ones.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 11:59:25 No.4488938 Report

Quoted By:

>>4477534
Anon these are beautiful

24KiB, 875x456, Screenshot 2025-08-26 at 2.35.32 PM.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 26 Aug 2025 18:40:02 No.4462866 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

Who the fuck likes this focal length? What is its purpose?

165 posts and 22 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 04:14:47 No.4488753 Report

Quoted By: >>4488756 >>4488798

>>4488750
get close
that's the fucking secret to phone-like focal lengths. (there's a reason why 28mm looks like snapshits - because it's the snapshit focal length every teenage girl uses on her iphone)

cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE

cANON !!oKsYTZ4HHVE Wed 17 Dec 2025 04:22:46 No.4488756 Report

Quoted By: >>4488798

>>4488750
If you go wide, shoot wide subjects or get close as >>4488753 said. Seaside shots as well as in-car shots are two examples that benefit from proper wides.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 14:43:04 No.4488798 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488753
>>4488756
Word, I'll creep up closer. Or shoot wide landscapes. Also the wider lenses for this camera are expensive. If I can't make 28mm work I'll probably just go back to shooting 50 and 135.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 20:28:56 No.4488870 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488725
i'll see you in court.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 10:44:02 No.4488934 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488750
Get 28mm vision in your mind.
It usually can be acquired by getting closer to subject and observing the environment before shootong.

Wide angles are difficult because our vision is usually much narrower.

But some dudes mentioned about
>muh zooming with your feet
It's a meme. If you make a change in the distance between camera and the subject, you will get different result. It just doesnt work.
On this matter, i recommend to think of composition based on the distance between you and the subject, rather than focal lengh of your lens and the subject.

45KiB, 512x468, 228.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 02:55:27 No.4488900 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4488907

Are fujiworms still a thing?
Did fujifilm fix the issue?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 05:04:34 No.4488907 Report

Quoted By: >>4488915

>>4488900
Yes
The fix is still running LRs enhance function on every single raw file.

This is a large part of why fujifags say editing takes hours. For them, it does. Also, xtrans raws load and reload as previews far slower than any other format. I opened an anons x100vi .rafs in c1 and holy shit my computer blows through d850 .NEFs but that shit lagged hard

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 07:31:34 No.4488915 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488907
i have never seen any fujifag say that

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 08:13:44 No.4488921 Report

Quoted By:

The real worms were the ones riddled in fujislug's brains all along

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 10:37:40 No.4488932 Report

Quoted By:

>using light room
lol

24KiB, 2400x2400, proxy-image.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 30 Jul 2025 13:49:36 No.4454439 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

>don't switch to a new mount in the digital transition so all your customers can still use their old film lenses
>pride yourself for upholding true photographic tradition and having the finest lenses with the most "character"
>release the first full frame camera that can actually make full use of all those "sweet" 35mm pentax lenses in 2016, literally 10 years after the competition
>in the meantime only make shitty APS-C kit zooms
>Release your only monochrome camera for the true affecionados
>It's APS-C
Why is this company such a joke?

323 posts and 75 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMGP5245.jpg, 823KiB, 2048x1365

Anonymous Wed 03 Dec 2025 05:23:22 No.4486086 Report

Quoted By:

>>4486085
This is at ISO 6400...my biggest issue is shooting auto (I know I know) the KF/K-70 was kind of dumb...the program line loves to trend towards a higher ISO than it actually needs. K1ii isn't nearly as bad at this aspect

I have a line on a KS2 for $150 locally w/18-50mm kit lens + 50mm f2 SMC but its 2 hours away (Allentown PA when I live in NYC) and I think the guy told me to go fuck myself because he quit replying when I said I wanted to keep in touch closer to Saturday to head out there.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 05 Dec 2025 23:17:06 No.4486530 Report

Quoted By: >>4488885

>>4486085
>not-screw drive lens selection
it doesn't matter if you have screw drive autofocus if you take pictures of servos

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 05 Dec 2025 23:39:14 No.4486540 Report

Quoted By:

A bunch of new firmware just dropped.
2025.12.05 PENTAX K-1 MARK II FIRMWARE UPDATE VERSION (2.51)
2025.12.05 PENTAX K-1 FIRMWARE UPDATE VERSION (2.51)
2025.12.05 PENTAX KF FIRMWARE UPDATE VERSION (1.33)
2025.12.05 K-70 FIRMWARE UPDATE VERSION (1.16)

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot 2025-12-17 at 6.32.41 (...).png, 138KiB, 725x908

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 23:42:35 No.4488885 Report

Quoted By: >>4488931

>>4463348

update i regret selling my kf for $380 (ended up getting $320)

whoever said you're better off keeping it was right the k1 is a fucking chore to bring sometimes

bought this k-70 with a broken screen for $105 + getting a ks2 screen off aliexpress for $40, could be aperture solenoid issues (i have a busted 35mm z1p with a mirror that sticks up i can salvage a white solenoid off of) either way its not a horrible job, hoping its the display or something free like they didn't hit the display button

>the LCD screen appears cracked and nothing is displayed

k-70s sell for $300 on avg in america and japan. cheapest i bidded was $170 for one.

also picked up a 50mm f1.4 fa, the 50mm f1.7 f was a great lens but i really wanna try a big fast lens for night photos. they usually go for $80 in japan and $100-140 in usa.

>>4486085

forgot to mention from doing research k1 vs k70 is one stop apart on dynamic range at every iso above 400

>>4486530

pentax af sucks for spur of the moment shots like when youre on vacation and wanna take a quick shot and keep it moving, lots of misses if you have ANY movement

that said im gonna try to pick up a pentax-a 28mm f2.8 or a 35mm f2 hd as my next prime; end of year i wanna try a 55-300mm plm ($200) or a 43mm limited ($400) and im done buying pentax lenses

gearfaggotry makes this hobby fun for me im a collector atp

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 10:35:37 No.4488931 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488885
>im a collector atp
this is what I realised when I bought a couple Pentax lenses and I didn't throw away any of the original packaging and I was deadset distraught when I scratched the lens hood on the macro lens I bought. It really fucked me up. I spent the last few months getting so into gear that I became a collector without even realising, emotionally invested in the mint condition of my gear, buying lenses I didn't need to "complete" my collection. Yeah, thank god Amazon's returns policy is ever in my favour. It's fucking unethical that I can return lenses that I used and get full money back. Anyway, I'll leave a report in this thread sliding off the arse end of the catalog:
>HD Pentax DA 21mm f/3.2 Limited
Beautiful construction, exquisite even, and so small. The image quality is so high contrast from Pentax HD lenses in general. I'm not sure if it is to my taste. It displays a modest amount of barrel distortion which I find kinda bothersome as a severely autistic person who needs things done in a certain way; I like optical corrections, couldn't tell you why.
>HD Pentax DA 40mm f/2.8 Limited
Again, very sexy looking lens. Much better geometry from this lens but the field of view is a bit tight for walking around town? It'll leave you constantly backing up to get the composition you want which is inconvenient if there's a fence, a wall or a road behind you. Still, it's a lens that works for street photography because it's so fucking compact and a little tight on the FOV to keep you out of the action. The screw-on lens cap was sexy, too.
>HD Pentax D-FA 100mm f/2.8 Macro
Yeah, it's a bokeh beast or whatever but what the fuck is the point of using a macro lens on a Pentax DSLR? Just the slightest bit of wind means that branch is outta focus and continuous autofocus only works until the AF point hits a low-contrast area, then the camera will rack the lens back and forth through the entire zoom range multiple times to no avail.

503KiB, 750x495, sex and takeout.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Sarah Bahbah

Anonymous Thu 11 Dec 2025 08:56:49 No.4487726 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

What's /p/'s opinion on one of the most viewed (online) photographers?
>Sex And Takeout is an ongoing viral series on the unnecessary and unkind social boundaries and cultural taboos forced upon women’s bodies. By indulging in sex and junk food, Bahbah proposes a celebration of the self. Inspired by her personal battle with disordered eating, Sex And Takeout is a declaration of overcoming guilt and shame. Through this series, Bahbah unpacks expectations of femininity and challenges her own standards of beauty.

78 posts and 27 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Dec 2025 20:54:33 No.4488314 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488296
You speak to the sort of goblin that says asking why jews are exempt from ukranian drafts is antisemitic

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 15 Dec 2025 03:15:21 No.4488370 Report

Quoted By: >>4488377

>>4488296
It’s all the idiotic shit you just throw in casually to try to make your point, between your cringe Nazi rhetoric is the part that I like. Apparently in your absolutely fucked understanding of this species, gluttony is a male problem and women are just imitating it? Bc bitches don’t overeat and have eating disorders & turn into whales? You do alternate between sounding like a total fucking moron and like you’re one realization (that education is a Jewish conspiracy brainwashing the children) away from being featured on the news face down.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1765766602014280.jpg, 372KiB, 890x1124

Anonymous Mon 15 Dec 2025 04:09:59 No.4488377 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488370
Gluttony as a glorification of the self IS a male vice.
>I am the manliest man here. I can eat more, and worse, food than anyone else. I eat pizza every day. I eat burgers for breakfast and steak for lunch. Beer is my water. Whisky is my blood. Salad and quiche are for gay fucking bitches. I'm having a great time. Et tu, BITCH?
This is distinctly male. It's a masochism ritual adjacent to eating whole hot peppers raw. It's a low grade pain/eating bitterness test. It is distinctly masculine.

And regardless of what it is, it is BAD FOR EVERYONE INVOLVED AND SHOULD NEVER BE ENCOURAGED.

>that education is a Jewish conspiracy brainwashing the children
Oh, certain facets of education are absolutely jewish conspiracies. Critical race theory and modernized equity (each maintain jews as a people who deserve to remain distinct and privileged) are distinctly jewish concepts. They are mandated by jewish religious belief. Another jewish aspect of education is framing all american wars as for global peace when they only advance israeli interests and establish central banks which inevitably tie back to 100% jewish families that owe their wealth to charlamagne. You know jews exist and aren't a boogeyman right? They are the white privilege you heard so much about.

Until they're sick of non-jews, then they're not white. They're oppressed.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 04:06:57 No.4488751 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488002
Cool post other than the latent belief in the progressive theory of history

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 05:33:22 No.4488908 Report

Quoted By:

looks like an art school project, bad lighting included

634KiB, 2000x1333, photo.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 22 Oct 2025 21:42:13 No.4476808 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4488889

at what age and how did you find that you were into photography/videography?

45 posts and 6 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 01:19:09 No.4488889 Report

Quoted By: >>4488891 >>4488892 >>4488894 >>4488901

>>4476808
At 41yo, when I inherited all 14,000 of my fambly photos to deal with. Gaddauym, fuggin SLIDES?? Wtf man, what am I going to do with all these fucking things, I should just toss em. And negatives, I can’t even see what’s on those to figure out if I have prints of em.

Start scanning prints, everything looketh like shit, look up how to better scan olde photos in highest quality…. 5 years later I’ve got a degree w a minor in photo, built my own slide/neg drum digitizer & processes, shoot architecture (not real estate) for a living w MF digishit & LF environmental/birding/macro for fun. And I’m still only 10% of the way through those slides, w 50 fucking started projects surely never to be completed, like a true artiste.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 01:24:25 No.4488891 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488889
Pay a shop to do it @ $20 per roll lmao.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 01:35:01 No.4488892 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488889
14kf frames?

Someone I know bought a cheapo canon rebel and sigma 70mm macro and valoi scanning kit to do 750 negs and did the laziest ever negative lab pro fixes because their family’s standard was "as long as we can tell whats on them"

Good luck!

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 01:57:33 No.4488894 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488889
Bless you for going through the collection, plus now you can turn your relative into the next Vivian Meyer
Post some for us

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 03:01:43 No.4488901 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488889
post your family anon

623KiB, 1576x1576, 1751598030916726.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

/mfg/ Medium Format General

Anonymous Thu 13 Nov 2025 12:04:38 No.4482553 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

Reply if you're a real mf'er

106 posts and 43 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO nhvvghnghvnhgjv.jpg, 3MiB, 1996x1967

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 21:13:38 No.4488875 Report

Quoted By: >>4488876 >>4488886

finally got a roll back with more images i like than ones i hate, good feeling bros

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 03680006.jpg, 5MiB, 2079x2048

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 21:14:42 No.4488876 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488875

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 23:44:59 No.4488886 Report

Quoted By: >>4488897

>>4488875
ok, now post the ones that you like

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1451952755351.png, 6KiB, 306x290

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 02:20:06 No.4488897 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488886

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 02:39:09 No.4488898 Report

Quoted By:

>>4487796
She looks like Urbosa lmao

11KiB, 500x318, canon5dmkii-kit_feature-500x318-1.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

The GEAR problem was already solved

Anonymous Tue 28 Oct 2025 16:17:39 No.4478405 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

this was the absolute peak of digital photography and its all been downhill after here. seriously look at the shots on flickr with this tag and how good they look. mirrorless is super sterile and fake looking, and older than the mkii just were shit to use and had too much noise.

seriously dont sleep on these, 5d mkii and some EF L glass has u covered and then u can spend the rest of the money on travel and taking kino shots.

181 posts and 29 images omitted

Sugar !egyYvoBZV2

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSC_6646.jpg, 1MiB, 2000x1331

Sugar !egyYvoBZV2 Mon 15 Dec 2025 13:57:59 No.4488403 Report

Quoted By: >>4488420 >>4488493

>>4487866

>vertical grips
>duplicate controls

The D4 has those things already and doesn't need a grip bolted onto it.

>>4487849

D2X is a very fine camera, if I hadn't got the scorching deal on my 4 I may have got one, I looked at a couple. I like the bigger screen on the 4.

>>4487822

I did get this for the FPS I do motorsports from time to time and things moving at speed. Realistically, you don't need more than 20mp unless you are printing super huge like above movie poster size.

I have a D800 for landscapes and architecture and a D700 for underwater work, both very good all-rounder cameras.

>>4487850

Pic related if I can walk into Carmen's Black and White Bar at Speedweek and still get these guys in focus after getting fucking shitfaced on free margaritas from Vintage Hammer's gas-powered margarita machine and put down enough Jack Daniels to make General Ulysses Grant blush, the AF on the D4 is just fine.

Calm your tits.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 15 Dec 2025 16:23:28 No.4488420 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488403
>The D4 has a vertical grip minus the feature where you can remove it
Why does it need to be so big when an EOS 1n weighs no where near that much and focuses faster? Nikon lost. Canon won. Sorry lil fella, YWN be in focus.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Dec 2025 00:09:31 No.4488493 Report

Quoted By: >>4488495

>>4488403
Resolution isn't just about printing big, it gives you flexibility when cropping. If the 16mp of the D4 does you fine then a 36mp would get you that with an APS-C crop, a 42mp body gets you a little over 1.6, 60mp gets you almost 2x crop. That means you can use smaller, lighter, cheaper lenses, or simply get more reach with what you have. Back in the day you had to make a choice between resolution and speed but that's not so much the case these days, at least to get an acceptable level of speed (matching the D4) because 20fps is largely unnecessary and just a skill cope.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Dec 2025 00:44:21 No.4488495 Report

Quoted By: >>4488810

>>4488493
Resolution is also about recognizing that digital looks like shit. Bayer just turns small details into vomit so it takes like 30mp for it to look as normal as 35mm film.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 15:13:23 No.4488810 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488495
Could you share us a 35mm scan that looks better than 30mp digital?

288KiB, 1199x1498, color.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 07 Dec 2025 23:02:40 No.4487132 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4488783 >>4488786

>"Black and white are the colors of photography. To me they symbolize the alternatives of hope and despair to which mankind is forever subjected." Robert Frank.
>"I work in colour sometimes, but I guess the images I most connect to, historically speaking, are in black and white. I see more in black and white – I like the abstraction of it." Mary Ellen Mark
I see a pattern. One of making the world increasingly drab to demoralize the people. Look up their early lives.

16 posts and 3 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 08:15:26 No.4488783 Report

Quoted By:

>>4487132

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO where-is-the-colour.gif, 482KiB, 400x300

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 08:30:34 No.4488786 Report

Quoted By: >>4488790

>>4487132
>Everything is either white, black, or a shade of grey. Maybe you see a couple blue and red cars, and if you find something yellow or even green you've hit the jackpot for the day
More of an /o/-tier whinge than /p/ but I feel like the sentiment applies here as well. Everything is just devoid of colour these days

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 12:26:19 No.4488790 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488786
High Impact were the days

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 14:14:16 No.4488794 Report

Quoted By:

I'm only shooting for myself. Travel and family. Photo and video. What I learned is that video easily brings people to tears. Because it's so real, you can dive back in memories and experience everything once more.

Photography is different. You look at the images and it only activates emotions IF you use them to remember back that moment. B&W photos make it easier to remember back because it makes your brain start thinking. You don't get the exact image of a situation but more a vague interpretation in form of a colorless scene. So I believe that this is the reason why b&w photography is so emotional for many while color photos just collect dust forever on your hdd. But that is just my idea and I don't know if thats any true. Once the Ricoh GR4x mono appears I use it as an excuse to learn more about it

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 15:03:55 No.4488807 Report

Quoted By:

>>4487148
Black and white is harder because you can only rely on light and composition

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Threads by latest replies - Page 4

On these archives

Your latest searches

/digishit/ SOOC JPEGs

Sarah Bahbah

/mfg/ Medium Format General

The GEAR problem was already solved