Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 4

Instant photography

No.4460516 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Does anyone care about instant photography in /p/
65 posts and 11 images omitted

/mage/ Macro Photography General

No.4433352 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
This thread is dedicated to close-range photographic captures utilising macro-optical imaging configurations to achieve greater reproduction ratios. Got it? Good now upload some shit.

Last thread:
>>4376661
236 posts and 121 images omitted

Ren Kockwell

No.4455026 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>he's back
our eyes were not ready, but at last we truly see:
https://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/skylum/luminar-neo.htm
79 posts and 13 images omitted

No.4458643 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>be me
>took basic digital photography course
>been using Instagram since 2012, watched it turn woke and enshittify
>more than 900 photos uploaded yet less than 120 followers in the end
>account got flagged for "spam" for pushing back against- and criticizing gender ideology or the LGBT+ cult
>gets deleted
>make new account
>algorithm sucks, hashtags no longer work because "muh Maui wildfires censorship" or something (it's no longer possible to browse posts by Recent)
>only a few followers and getting some likes partly from thot spambots, old followers either forgot about me or don't care anymore but new account is rather unaffiliated to old one in terms of Big Data
>looked near the Sun during 2017's partial solar eclipse in a backyard with white-ass walls reflecting sunlight like snow
>vision felt like it got slightly less bright and less colorful after that, but maybe it healed after all these years
>Nikon camera got humid inside during a vacation trip, then got dirty with rice dust (yes, rice dust) because silly me tried putting it inside a bag of rice to take humidity out = lowkey bodied
>stone-inside-shoe kind of problem made me lose enjoyment for photography even though I wasn't that good at it
>wat do
131 posts and 22 images omitted

No.4455763 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>"DUDE 50mm PRIME LENS is so good"
>*tried 50mm prime lens out*
>tried to shoot places
>too tight
>tried to shoot interior
>too narrow

this is fucking suck, this has got to be a fucking meme. There is no way people actually prefer this over 24-70mm.
320 posts and 38 images omitted

protests, demonstrations, riots and rallies

No.4469762 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
contribute
20 posts and 14 images omitted

/cloud/ - general

No.4464631 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
#1
post ur clouds edition
47 posts and 39 images omitted

No.4469759 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
>films documentary with $17k medium format camera
>tonehslop all the way through
I think we should ban selling lenses brighter than f/2.8 for FF or equivalent. Brighter lenses should only be produced in limited quantities and loaned to certified shops. We must end this DoFslopfest right fucking NOW
11 posts omitted

/cum/- Cars Und Motorsport

No.4453529 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
79 posts and 60 images omitted

Canon EOS R5 Mark I vs Mark II

No.4469861 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Hi there! I'm trying to get back into photography after a 5y break. Mainly just as a hobby for now, with the possibility of turning it into a semi-professional side hustle.

My last camera was a Sony A7 III, but I've always wanted to try Canon (mostly for the color science and the better grip/ergonomics). I've been looking at the Canon R5 Mark I and was pretty set on it, but then a friend asked me: "Why not the R5 Mark II?" My first answer was obviously the price. But now I'm starting to wonder if the difference is worth it, considering this might be my last and only camera.

I know the technical and feature differences between the two, but I’m more curious about the practical side — how much those differences actually matter in real use.

Can anyone here help me justify one over the other? On the one hand, the price difference noticeable for my pocket. On the other hand, I don't want to buy an expensive camera, run into some limitations in a few years, and regret not spending a bit more.

Also, if it matters, the lenses I'm planning to buy are:
1. RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
2. RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Appreciate any advice in advance!
3 posts omitted