New thread
Threads by latest replies - Page 4
Quoted By:
Anyone experienced with product photography? I have an empty room available in my house and thought of building a setup for that. Building a small side business. Given I know how to compose and take photos as well as having all the necessary gear.. why not? Is this market easier to make some €€€ compared to the standard wedding/portrait photography? Of course need to build a strong portfolio first, website, etc.
I'm clueless about cameras or film. I want something easy to carry on my hunting/fishing trips. Good zoom, night mode would be a plus. This one has bad zoom.
Quoted By: >>4412852
What are nice poses for men?
Quoted By:
Rangefinder bros... we are so fucking back
Quoted By:
Why would you spend 3k on camera and lenses if you don't even have a life worth documenting anon?
>Primary: 50MP 1.0″ sensor, 3.2 µm (4-in-1) pixels,23mm equivalent f/1.63 aperture lens, OIS
>Tele 1: 50MP, 1.4 µm (4-in-1) pixels, 70mm equivalent f/1.8-aperture lens, OIS
>Tele 2: 200MP, 2.24 µm pixels, 100mm equivalent f/2.6-aperture lens (periscope design), OIS
>Ultra-wide: 50MP, 1.28 µm (4-in-1) pixels, 14mm f/2.2-aperture lens
Can this thing unironically replace a mirrorless camera kit?
>Tele 1: 50MP, 1.4 µm (4-in-1) pixels, 70mm equivalent f/1.8-aperture lens, OIS
>Tele 2: 200MP, 2.24 µm pixels, 100mm equivalent f/2.6-aperture lens (periscope design), OIS
>Ultra-wide: 50MP, 1.28 µm (4-in-1) pixels, 14mm f/2.2-aperture lens
Can this thing unironically replace a mirrorless camera kit?
Quoted By: >>4412846
Do people really buy these for $1600? You can get a $20 film 35mm p&s for $20.
>bigger "sensor" at full frame
>similar quality lens
>images will actually look like film instead of m43 photos with an s-curve
>saves you $1580
>similar size
Just admit this is a fashion accessory, not a real camera. Same goes for the Richo retards. If you were serious about having a compact, high quality camera you would just being buying a 90s film point and shoot.
>bigger "sensor" at full frame
>similar quality lens
>images will actually look like film instead of m43 photos with an s-curve
>saves you $1580
>similar size
Just admit this is a fashion accessory, not a real camera. Same goes for the Richo retards. If you were serious about having a compact, high quality camera you would just being buying a 90s film point and shoot.
Quoted By:
why would you spend 5000$ on a fancy camera if cheap phones have 4k sensors that can take pictures like this?
Quoted By: >>4412548
I visited New Orleans over new years and shot some street. Was with family so I couldn't really lock in but I think some of these pics are decent. What do you think? Tear them apart.
All shot on my nikon f5 with 15yr expired ultramax.
All shot on my nikon f5 with 15yr expired ultramax.
