Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 4

No.4476309 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
photos of my cat Rupert that i took on my phone which at least trace amounts of thoughtful composition, as per the board rules


I like this shot because it really focuses on his face, which is cute
69 posts and 31 images omitted

/p/hasion thread

No.4483187 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
LEICA Reporter Jacket MONOCHROM edition

In this thread, we're going to talk about photographic fashion which is what we wear when we're photographing or filming and doing related stuffs(developing, scanning, reviewing, printing, sucking up the client's shit, etc)

What do you wear when you photograph?

What is your must have /p/hasion item?

Do you have any item you're looking for?
16 posts and 5 images omitted

Darktable thread

No.4489604 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
5.4 is out, what do we think bros?
132 posts and 10 images omitted

No.4487003 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Haven't posted in a couple of months but got a few rolls developed recently and I'm slowly going through scanning them.

Exif: Leica M3 + Nokton 50mm f.1.5 + Vision3 250D (for the first seven ones), then Aerocolor IV for the remaining four.
48 posts and 20 images omitted

No.4488991 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
What makes pic related so uncanny and unpleasant to look at? Is it the lack of shadows? Why would a photographer go for such effect?
24 posts omitted

Photography is dead

No.4485169 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
The pursuit of being in the right place at the right time to capture the perfect sky no longer holds its former value when that very sky can be synthesized from colored pixels. When a dramatic reddish dawn or an approaching thunderstorm is conjured with a few strokes in Photoshop, or when a telephone receiver in a model’s hand is seamlessly swapped for a sneaker using Adobe Firefly with context-aware lighting adjustments, the photograph was, at best, merely raw material.

Even the need for initial raw material is obsolete, as AI can generate sophisticated images entirely ex nihilo.

Even the tangible, physical nature of the print offers no reliable refuge: A picture developed on photographic paper from a negative, held in the viewer's hand, might still originate from a digitally generated negative, or the photographer might have used analog means to re-photograph a digitally produced and printed image.

In sharp contrast, painting remains a sanctuary of authenticity. Within a painting, the physical labor and the direct interaction of the artist with paint on a substrate are inherently stored and visible. The viewer holding a painted image recognizes the unique signature, the texture of the applied color, and the clear intentionality of the human creator behind it.

While robots can wield a paintbrush, they cannot yet fully simulate the human touch. The immediate, non-reproducible trace of the human creator in the finished work remains the key differentiator. Traditional, handcrafted creation is reclaiming its significance.

This shift in perception is already evident at art fairs which do not show specifically photographs: Visitors often walk past photographs but pause thoughtfully before paintings. In art, people are not seeking the perfect illusion; they are seeking the visible, verifiable, and therefore authentic trace of another human being.
21 posts and 3 images omitted

/m43/ - Micro Four Thirds General - I'm back edition

No.4485342 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Welcome to /m43/general!

m43 sisters, we are known to be adventurers at heart. While Wormfags and Snoybois debate mtf charts and x-trans rights, we go out and explore the world around us. Capturing its beauty within m43's infinite depth of field.

In this edition: I am back to m43. I've sold my huge bulky Nikon Zf after realizing that I'm way too feminine to lug around such a huge piece of Japanese technology and I got meself a brand new OM5 Mk. II.

I also got a GX9 to live out my closeted homesexual street photography urges. Picrelated is my sane financial choices in one picture. Enjoy!

A list of m43 youtubers you should totally watch if you hate yourself:

Landscape (leaves and rocks):
Guido v. (OM1) - https://www.youtube.com/@GuidoVanDeWater
Henry Turner (OM5) - https://www.youtube.com/@HenryTurnerphoto
Waterfall Joe (OM1) - https://www.youtube.com/@WaterfallJoe/videos
Ian Worth (OM1) - https://www.youtube.com/@ian_worth/videos

Nature/Wildlife (bird buttholes):
Lee Hoy (OM1.2) - https://www.youtube.com/@leehoyphotography
Espen Helland (OM5, OM1) - https://www.youtube.com/@EspenHelland
Emilie Talpin (OM1.2) - https://www.youtube.com/@EmilieT

Street (just buttholes):
Jimmi West (OM5) - https://www.youtube.com/@jimmywestphoto

Gearfags/AIDS (insufferable assholes):
M43 Guy - https://www.youtube.com/@ThatMicro43Guy
Micro Four Nerds - https://www.youtube.com/@MicroFourNerds
RED35 - https://www.youtube.com/@Red35Photography
Robin Wong - https://www.youtube.com/@robinwong
Thomas Eisl - https://www.youtube.com/@ThomasEisl.Photography
Chris Baitson - https://www.youtube.com/@ChrisBaitson (ultra fag)
367 posts and 60 images omitted

Is it wrong to look at pictures of others from a thrifted digicam?

No.4489096 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
I just got an old digicam and the previous owners didn't delete all the photos. I took a peek and some of the pics are actually kino.
3 posts omitted

No.4488583 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
New color film!!!
lucky 200 has finally dropped.
Anybody shot it yet? waiting for my order to arrive.
3 posts omitted

/raw/ - Post Processing & Editing thread

No.4488575 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Well nobody else is gonna so here we go, here's a RAW/EDIT thread.
I've provided some of mine, a few of which I've edited in the past but also a few I've never touched. Links:

>Daylight Landscape with Semi-Challenging Lighting.
https://files.catbox.moe/9lc3dk.CR3
>Backlit Wildlife (bin chicken) Scene. I was never happy with any edits.
https://files.catbox.moe/ctd0mg.CR3
>Interior Low-Light Figurines.
https://files.catbox.moe/l1fmr2.CR3
>Panning Motorsport Scene.
>also pic rel own edit
https://files.catbox.moe/c84va5.CR3

>This thread is less about the merits of a particular photograph, and more about how to edit and change them. CONSTRUCTIVE feedback is great, but aimless shitflnging is for the other threads
>I wholly encourage more of you to post RAWs, as I enjoy giving it a crack myself, as do some other anons otb
>Use catbox.moe to link uploads as there is no way you will upload your RAW with the board's anemic 5MB limit
>If you post a RAW, thank you.
>If you post an EDIT, it's handy to give a quick run down of what you did, how much NR/sharpening etc., and what software you used.
-----
36 posts and 9 images omitted