Film photography is better due to low sensitivity in dark areas. No one needs to see what is in dark areas most of the time. Just imagine this photo with unnecessary crap in shadows.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4470768 Hello Zach, do you mind putting your name back on so I can keep filtering your posts? Thanks.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485330 >No. Resolution (refinement of detail) is related to contrast No, it's related to smallest unit of information. A smallest subdivision of a storage that is the lowest limit and you can't go below it. Contrast has nothing to do here.
Anonymous
>>4469575 >Film photography is better due to low sensitivity in dark areas digital kicks the shit out of film for low light capture . try again retard.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485559 Try what? You both said the same thing.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485559 Yeah OP is claiming the lack of shadow detail is good because we normally wouldnt be able to see that much (in well lit scene) so it reflects realtiy in that we tend to ignore less obvious visual information.
Anyway learn to read, you ESL Bangladeshi.
and a worse form of it than vidya or movies?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Everything is just escapism. At least photographyinvolves the creation of something.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485240 >>4485241 Seething snowggers. Lol imagine contributing less to math and science than the balkans
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4474681 >a worse form of it than vidya or movies? only a retard would try to entertain this point.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4474681 Its not that deep lil bro
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485237 >our eye color is direclty related to our bheavior, to our intelligence I love that any time I think I must have encountered the absolute dumbest manchild in the world, I can get on this board and within minutes one of you will prove me wrong.
So, which of the big companies is going to be the first to offer an affordable 100mp camera? Fuji is obviously already out there, but this thing is Eight thousand dollars. I suspect that when it happens (eventually) it will be Nikon. I feel like historically they are the company which has introduced high end features at a lower price.
Anonymous
>>4482703 > 6x7 is clearly 80mp >645 is 100+mp Which one is true?
Yes, this guy in his clinical lab tests using extremely fine grain film stocks managed to get crazy resolution out of 6x7. Do you shoot 6x7? Can you provide me with a scan with 50mp of resolved detail? I doubt you can. I doubt anyone in this thread can, because as I said, those numbers are not attained by 99% of medium format shooters.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482782 6x7 is 80mp on an old ass drum
645 exceeds 100mp with modern scanning equipment
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4480592 >So, which of the big companies is going to be the first to offer an affordable 100mp camera? if you want 100 mp you are retarded. learn what pixel pitch is.
Anonymous
>>4480592 Theres a bigger chance of the next iphone hitting 100MP than boomer mirrorless cameras
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485650 100 mega pixels of ai slop and other assorted computer gimmickery. No thanks, I'll stick with the "boomer" mirrorless, even though mirrorless cameras only came about after the boomers had already started to die off.
The pursuit of being in the right place at the right time to capture the perfect sky no longer holds its former value when that very sky can be synthesized from colored pixels. When a dramatic reddish dawn or an approaching thunderstorm is conjured with a few strokes in Photoshop, or when a telephone receiver in a model’s hand is seamlessly swapped for a sneaker using Adobe Firefly with context-aware lighting adjustments, the photograph was, at best, merely raw material. Even the need for initial raw material is obsolete, as AI can generate sophisticated images entirely ex nihilo. Even the tangible, physical nature of the print offers no reliable refuge: A picture developed on photographic paper from a negative, held in the viewer's hand, might still originate from a digitally generated negative, or the photographer might have used analog means to re-photograph a digitally produced and printed image. In sharp contrast, painting remains a sanctuary of authenticity. Within a painting, the physical labor and the direct interaction of the artist with paint on a substrate are inherently stored and visible. The viewer holding a painted image recognizes the unique signature, the texture of the applied color, and the clear intentionality of the human creator behind it. While robots can wield a paintbrush, they cannot yet fully simulate the human touch. The immediate, non-reproducible trace of the human creator in the finished work remains the key differentiator. Traditional, handcrafted creation is reclaiming its significance. This shift in perception is already evident at art fairs which do not show specifically photographs: Visitors often walk past photographs but pause thoughtfully before paintings. In art, people are not seeking the perfect illusion; they are seeking the visible, verifiable, and therefore authentic trace of another human being.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485261 I would reproduce with her if you know what I mean
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485169 I print in darkroom only, so sounds like not my problem pal
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485169 yes photography is dead
you should stop doing
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485169 >schizo rant didnt read lol
Quoted By:
Random photos you took at night
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4481540 iirc the blossoms pic was on bessa r2m with voigtlander 35mm nokton classic. film probably expired kodak max
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rollercoasters are a great medium
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Can UV filters help to reduce purple fringing?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4481608 >Doesn't understand T-stops or why they exist Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485444 Fringng? Lack of optical correction which allows aberrations.
What are aberrations? Normally different wavelengths of light bending at different values which means red and purple hit the sensor in slightly different areas and so on.
Vintange lenses will normally exhibit some strong fringing since they didnt quite get there yet in terms of optical engineering, but it's also why modern superzooms or teles or even your wide aperture normals are like twice the size of vintage stuff: extra elements and better engineering that requires larger glass surfaces will aid in reducing aberrations at the cost of, well, cost and size.
Purple fringing seems to be the most common but I never looked into why, just that some photography software has inbuilt adjustments specifically for it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4479561 based Darktable enjoyer. Raw chrom ab also works great
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4479561 also if you go into >lens corrections and then manipulate >tca override to align the red and blue channels in the RAW, you can actually eliminate almost all fringing entirely, it's an incredible feature that I randomly stumbled upon watching a DT youtube tutorial
I like the aesthetics of tobbaco, zippos and leather
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485326 >And you are supposed to light a cigar with a match. Yeah, if you want to enjoy those sulfur flavors ... fucking kids nowadays
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485326 Tobacco is thirdie, not manly.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4473779 It has so much aura
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485326 The best is cedar sticks. Using butane is preferable to a zippo type lighter because lighter fluid also has a bad taste to it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Anyone else here working a regular job/day job as a photographer? I've been working as a real estate photographer for a while and still do side jobs for things like corporate portraits/events, and I'm curious if anyone else on /p/ works in photography too.
Anonymous
>>4484716 I did, and unless you are masochistic or soulless enough to live traveling between major shitties it is a hobby-ruining middling to low income "job" that splits the difference between customer service and the light trades (painting and stuff)
Most successful people benefited from nepotism as well. Many steins bergs mans and witzes.
Anonymous
>>4484716 Did some contract retail and property shit but quickly realised I dont want photography to be my job
Paid photogs are on e-z mode: Comp'd gear so you get whatever is needed even if it's expensive and big. Standards are relatively low since everything is set by policy and standardised (i.e just don't fuck up exposure. Set lighting equipment here and here. Take X amount of photos from X angles etc.).
Paid photogs are the least sovlful photogs you could ask for. Maybe an exception can be made for nat geo stuff since it's relatively impressive some of the stuff these guys can produce but most of the time they're freelancers anyway from what I know.
Anyway. 4 dollars a pound.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485449 >it is a hobby-ruining middling to low income "job" that splits the difference between customer service and the light trades Real estate felt that way. Soulless and ruined my interest in photography, I didn't touch my personal gear for months when I started since I didn't want to go out and take photos anymore. Absolute garbage pay too, you'd make more money bussing tables at a fucking Denny's.
Anonymous
>>4485450 There’s this cult on the internet that tells people
>u haf to be a profeshunal If they dare want gear that doesn’t easily get mogged by a phone more than 2 stops past base ISO so sadly people keep trying to enter this shitty oversaturated field
If you like portraits do those as a side gig. Nothing else. No one here likes social climbing and all the narcissistic and sociopathic games it involves so forget fashion and "real art". Photography is a hobby first and foremost.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4485455 >shitty oversaturated field This applies to so many fields that people would "love" to work in, and photography is a great example of it.
It's oversaturated because being paid to take photos 95% of the time requires nothing more than "click the button, anon". I'm starting to think any moderately interesting field/job draws these mediocre morons to them by simple viture of the fact they they're unqualified and unskilled but want something other than a retail job.
Photography is a hobby that supplements other hobbies/events* that you go through in life. Even if you claim to like tinkering with manual cameras or developing film or whatever, they're seperate hobbies. Photography itself cannot be sustained on its own.
Quoted By:
This thread is dedicated to close-range photographic captures utilising macro-optical imaging configurations to achieve greater reproduction ratios. Got it? Good now upload some shit.
Last thread:
>>4376661
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4484609 >underexposed >could have fixed it in post but didn't how do you live with yourself?
like, really, how?
my eyes had to see that and you probably didn't think it would be an issue but it is!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Tamron 1:1 90mm ff or laowa 2:1 65mm aspc on aspc camera?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
How to manual focus stack properly with minimal size distorsion. I have a af lens x 0.5mag and trying to do manual focus stacking trying the fwd and back rocking method but i end up with the subject movement and change in size. Any advice?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
any film macro people have experience with olympus' 80mm f/4 macro lens? thinking about picking up a good condition used one for my OM-2n as an upgrade over the close up focus rings I use currently. comes with the extension tube as well I think.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4484609 nice photo anon, i like it.
im gonna go take some pics with my extension tubes