Quoted By: >>4379160
What went wrong, sisters?
Alright, Previous threads burning out.
Time for more of your recent photos - post em' here.
Previous RPT >>4373079
Threads by latest replies - Page 7
!!1cdp+8vuoOY
Quoted By:
Quoted By:
Hello people. Since it's a photography board, I'll post some photos from yesterday. Comments and critics welcome.
Quoted By: >>4379162
How do we save photography and ourselves bros? Media has gone completely schizo and there is no way one single image of literally anything, not even hardcore porn can compete with what short form video has done to 99% of people's brains. The output of our hobby is decimated because of over-stimulation and information overload.
Is there anything that can be done? Do we have to all get into video ASAP and accept that stills are dead? Do we start writing on blogs again like it was 2012 to go with our photos? Walling off into Flickr did not work as that platform is even more dead than Instagram. We have some of the most realistic, smartest autists online on 4chan, I am sure we can come up with a logical practical solution.
inbf
>just shoot for yourself
>just print the photos and put them on your bedroom wall who cares lol
No, this is just cope. We all know it.
Is there anything that can be done? Do we have to all get into video ASAP and accept that stills are dead? Do we start writing on blogs again like it was 2012 to go with our photos? Walling off into Flickr did not work as that platform is even more dead than Instagram. We have some of the most realistic, smartest autists online on 4chan, I am sure we can come up with a logical practical solution.
inbf
>just shoot for yourself
>just print the photos and put them on your bedroom wall who cares lol
No, this is just cope. We all know it.
How do I do megapixel crop math?
For example: If I have a 50mm prime, but I want to be able to crop in post to 75mm, a factor of 1.5 while retaining a resolution of say 20mp, all I'd need to do is multiply 20*(3/2) for a value of 30mp, since that is the ratio of 75mm/50mm, is that correct?
I'm thinking about changing up the way I shoot and switching over from 2 zoom lenses, to 2 prime lenses and I want to make sure I can cover all of my usual focal lengths by crop in post.
I am not entirely clear on how this effects compression. It seems like taking a 20mm and cropping to 40mm, you would still end up the compression aesthetic of the 20mm, but I've heard people say otherwise.
For example: If I have a 50mm prime, but I want to be able to crop in post to 75mm, a factor of 1.5 while retaining a resolution of say 20mp, all I'd need to do is multiply 20*(3/2) for a value of 30mp, since that is the ratio of 75mm/50mm, is that correct?
I'm thinking about changing up the way I shoot and switching over from 2 zoom lenses, to 2 prime lenses and I want to make sure I can cover all of my usual focal lengths by crop in post.
I am not entirely clear on how this effects compression. It seems like taking a 20mm and cropping to 40mm, you would still end up the compression aesthetic of the 20mm, but I've heard people say otherwise.
Quoted By:
How did he got away with it?
Quoted By:
>solved photography
>*heh personnel kid*
>*heh personnel kid*
Quoted By:
There has never been a significant landscape photograph in the entire history of photography. No top 100 photos of all time list would ever include a landscape.
I know landscapes were looked down on in paintings as well.
Should I swap to street photography? landscape seems a dead end.
I know landscapes were looked down on in paintings as well.
Should I swap to street photography? landscape seems a dead end.
Quoted By:
>Cheeto Dust Covered Bee Edition
1. Macro is based
2. Anything lower than f/16 is useless, anything over f/8 causes diffraction (we don't care)
3. Get a flash of some kind if you're doing handheld macro, get a softbox if your lighting is too harsh (it is)
4. 1x magnification can be overkill. Nobody cares if you hit 1x or greater, if it's framed like shit
5. 200mm for bugs, 100mm for all-purpose, lower focal lengths are memes
6. Extension tubes are cheap enough to dabble. Stick them on something between 50-200mm and go to town
7. Gear posts are allowed but keep it on topic
8. Any macro is encouraged. Bugs, plants, textures, minis etc. all welcome
Previous Thread >>4342854
1. Macro is based
2. Anything lower than f/16 is useless, anything over f/8 causes diffraction (we don't care)
3. Get a flash of some kind if you're doing handheld macro, get a softbox if your lighting is too harsh (it is)
4. 1x magnification can be overkill. Nobody cares if you hit 1x or greater, if it's framed like shit
5. 200mm for bugs, 100mm for all-purpose, lower focal lengths are memes
6. Extension tubes are cheap enough to dabble. Stick them on something between 50-200mm and go to town
7. Gear posts are allowed but keep it on topic
8. Any macro is encouraged. Bugs, plants, textures, minis etc. all welcome
Previous Thread >>4342854
Quoted By: >>4376419
