More immersive than 2D photos but less immersive than videos. Afaik there is no way to see them with the wobbly effect outside the Apple ecosystem (Windows or Linux) yet and there is only one Canon camera/lens that does it yet.

Did I waste my money getting an M43 camera instead of full frame? I got an EM1-III because it seemed to have everything I wanted, and the picture quality is good, but now reading more discussions on /p/ I wonder if the picture quality is actually bad and I can't see it, and if I should sell for full frame

What's the best way to start a career in photography? I currently take photos as a hobby, but I decided to turn that into a profession and been looking to expand my lenses collection as I currently only have a wide-angle zoom.
Is it better to fill my needs with "cheap" lenses and then upgrade later on or just buy a single high-end product as a high-stake investment to match other photographer's inage quality?

What’s the highest possible resolution camera that fits in a shirt pocket and uses SD cards (not Micro SD)? Bonus points if it uses AA batteries, but USB charging is okay.

So which one am I supposed to buy?
Peak Design or Falcam?

Post photos you took from old cameras.
Mine is a Hitachi DVD/HDD camcorder (has a still photo option)

I love photography.

Or at least that's what I think every time I see a good photo!! I'm incredibly passionate about it and I'm studying to become great at it. I'm going to share a bit of my art with you below. I hope you can genuinely guide me on this path I'm just embarking on with my own hands. Yes, it's personal, it's the only thing that calms me and gives me peace for now.
And as I read somewhere, it's not the weapon, but the soldier who carries it.

>lurk /p/
>all I care about is gear and specs and feel nothing is good enough
>stop lurking
>actually go out and shoot
>have fun and realise basically anything is fine
Gear really is a meme

I've spent about 2 years shooting with a beat up canon 70d I got on craigslist and I'm ready to drop some money on a new camera. I've narrowed my choices down to these two because of the following:

- Rugged and actually weather sealed
- I like the build quality, feel and color rendering of the lenses (HD pentax D-FAs and the OM pro f/2.8s)
- Comfortably in my budget used (with lenses)

I'm leaning more towards the OM because I will be backpacking a lot and the weight savings are attractive (especially with telephoto), however I'm willing to put up with the weight if the pentax will have outstandingly better image quality.

My use-case will be travel with a bit of wildlife photography, I will shoot everything in RAW and edit, and all of my photos will be shared online or printed to a max of 11x17". I also never carry a tripod/monopod.

Some of my pros for each system:
OM-1
>lightweight and compact
>m43 wider DOF
>more variety of modern glass
>cheaper telephoto options

K-1ii
>higher resolution (can crop for wildlife)
>better dynamic range and color depth
>better in low light?

I'm sure everyone will tell me to go full frame and go to the gym but I was hoping to get some additional perspective, ideally from someone who has owned both FF and modern m43.

Some additional points:
-I know they are both dead systems
-No I will not get a canon/nikon/sony

Thanks for your time

Youtube photography channels that are bearable and actually fun to watch.
So the opposite of Jared "buy my presets" Polin and Peter "I tell you what to buy" McKinnon.

@VisualEducationStudio good tutorials on lighting with little gear faggotry.

@TinHouseStudioUK
The talking head and podcast videos are complete shit, but videos with actual photography have some decent explanations and style ideas.

@christopherfrost
neutral and technical reviews of lenses with no bullshit attached and no product shilling.

And for those into videography:
@MediaDivision
Long, detailed and relaxing videos with good editing and just a pleasure to watch. Even makes the gear shilling enjoyable.