Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 7

Photography is dead

No.4485169 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
The pursuit of being in the right place at the right time to capture the perfect sky no longer holds its former value when that very sky can be synthesized from colored pixels. When a dramatic reddish dawn or an approaching thunderstorm is conjured with a few strokes in Photoshop, or when a telephone receiver in a model’s hand is seamlessly swapped for a sneaker using Adobe Firefly with context-aware lighting adjustments, the photograph was, at best, merely raw material.

Even the need for initial raw material is obsolete, as AI can generate sophisticated images entirely ex nihilo.

Even the tangible, physical nature of the print offers no reliable refuge: A picture developed on photographic paper from a negative, held in the viewer's hand, might still originate from a digitally generated negative, or the photographer might have used analog means to re-photograph a digitally produced and printed image.

In sharp contrast, painting remains a sanctuary of authenticity. Within a painting, the physical labor and the direct interaction of the artist with paint on a substrate are inherently stored and visible. The viewer holding a painted image recognizes the unique signature, the texture of the applied color, and the clear intentionality of the human creator behind it.

While robots can wield a paintbrush, they cannot yet fully simulate the human touch. The immediate, non-reproducible trace of the human creator in the finished work remains the key differentiator. Traditional, handcrafted creation is reclaiming its significance.

This shift in perception is already evident at art fairs which do not show specifically photographs: Visitors often walk past photographs but pause thoughtfully before paintings. In art, people are not seeking the perfect illusion; they are seeking the visible, verifiable, and therefore authentic trace of another human being.
21 posts and 3 images omitted

/m43/ - Micro Four Thirds General - I'm back edition

No.4485342 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Welcome to /m43/general!

m43 sisters, we are known to be adventurers at heart. While Wormfags and Snoybois debate mtf charts and x-trans rights, we go out and explore the world around us. Capturing its beauty within m43's infinite depth of field.

In this edition: I am back to m43. I've sold my huge bulky Nikon Zf after realizing that I'm way too feminine to lug around such a huge piece of Japanese technology and I got meself a brand new OM5 Mk. II.

I also got a GX9 to live out my closeted homesexual street photography urges. Picrelated is my sane financial choices in one picture. Enjoy!

A list of m43 youtubers you should totally watch if you hate yourself:

Landscape (leaves and rocks):
Guido v. (OM1) - https://www.youtube.com/@GuidoVanDeWater
Henry Turner (OM5) - https://www.youtube.com/@HenryTurnerphoto
Waterfall Joe (OM1) - https://www.youtube.com/@WaterfallJoe/videos
Ian Worth (OM1) - https://www.youtube.com/@ian_worth/videos

Nature/Wildlife (bird buttholes):
Lee Hoy (OM1.2) - https://www.youtube.com/@leehoyphotography
Espen Helland (OM5, OM1) - https://www.youtube.com/@EspenHelland
Emilie Talpin (OM1.2) - https://www.youtube.com/@EmilieT

Street (just buttholes):
Jimmi West (OM5) - https://www.youtube.com/@jimmywestphoto

Gearfags/AIDS (insufferable assholes):
M43 Guy - https://www.youtube.com/@ThatMicro43Guy
Micro Four Nerds - https://www.youtube.com/@MicroFourNerds
RED35 - https://www.youtube.com/@Red35Photography
Robin Wong - https://www.youtube.com/@robinwong
Thomas Eisl - https://www.youtube.com/@ThomasEisl.Photography
Chris Baitson - https://www.youtube.com/@ChrisBaitson (ultra fag)
367 posts and 60 images omitted

Is it wrong to look at pictures of others from a thrifted digicam?

No.4489096 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
I just got an old digicam and the previous owners didn't delete all the photos. I took a peek and some of the pics are actually kino.
3 posts omitted

No.4488583 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
New color film!!!
lucky 200 has finally dropped.
Anybody shot it yet? waiting for my order to arrive.
3 posts omitted

GIMP

No.4480655 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Does anyone use GIMP for photo editing and manipulation? Has it become a "photographer's program" yet, or is it still clunky and freetarded?
23 posts and 2 images omitted

No.4454439 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>don't switch to a new mount in the digital transition so all your customers can still use their old film lenses
>pride yourself for upholding true photographic tradition and having the finest lenses with the most "character"
>release the first full frame camera that can actually make full use of all those "sweet" 35mm pentax lenses in 2016, literally 10 years after the competition
>in the meantime only make shitty APS-C kit zooms
>Release your only monochrome camera for the true affecionados
>It's APS-C
Why is this company such a joke?
324 posts and 76 images omitted

No.4476808 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
at what age and how did you find that you were into photography/videography?
47 posts and 6 images omitted

ITT: YouTuber Hate

No.4463667 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Why are photography YouTubers so shit? They mostly churn out boring nontent while dressing like a copy of a copy of a copy of someone who thought he might closet cosplay Ansel Adams. Who are they aping?
Almost all have the cadence and tone of a best buy sales associate either slowly conniving a golden HDMI cable sale or postponing their suicide on a Sunday evening only since their parents are still alive; with no in-between.
I meet smarter and more interesting people IRL at camera club or local stores, so it's not as if this hobby is exclusively for people prescribed Klonopin and SSRIs.
Half of them are just talking head slop direct to camera talking about what gear to buy (micro four nerds)
The ones that do teardowns and repairs of gear are usually fine, but those aren't exactly photo videos at that point.

The only guy that does the "video of taking photos" thing I can stand is Nick LoPresti since he doesn't talk like he's constipated, but lately the lack of constipation has become a problem since he's been diarrhea-shitting up my sub box with low-effort commentary videos sitting in front of a green screen. Idk who he's aping there, 2016 twitch? Don't like it, especially one where he and his wife are politisperging about shit like how "they can't use Google search for inane things because it'll track you" for what feels like several minutes.

Snappiness may be my second favorite even though he looks and talks like a queer (he has kids so I guess he isn't technically). At least he does ridiculous things with cameras that are more interesting than "I walked and took a photo of something and had some ennui about it".

Also, I hate gxAce with a passion, dead horse of a gimmick beaten into dust at this point. 80% of his videos serve no purpose to the modal viewer since they're just a rain-dance to the corporate marketing teams to get them to send him gear. (Also combining sloppy wet deep-throat glazing prose with an aloof tone is uniquely excruciating to listen to.)
257 posts and 32 images omitted

/digishit/ SOOC JPEGs

No.4477534 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
contribute
mostly wanted to experiment with the 'natural' setting on the K10D
I think I used -2 saturation, 0 contrast, +1 sharpening but I adjusted it here and there
I also played with color correction in the WB but it wasn't too great

also, /digishit/ general bread
147 posts and 129 images omitted

No.4484962 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
If you had a time machine, what historical event would you shoot?
22 posts and 1 image omitted