Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 7

OM-5 REVIEW

No.4486725 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
1/?

This is the review of an OM-5 micro 4/3 camera. I am a full frame user, and I bought this camera to have a small, fun, attractive camera to take snapshits around town. I own or have owned a D850, Z5ii, Z6ii, basically every Nikon DXXX DSLR, D500, Z50, etc. This is my first M43 camera and I was not sure what to expect, so I am chronicling my impressions both for myself, and for other photographers who are looking for a small, fun camera.

Ergonomics: This camera is outstanding IMO. For me the Nikon FF cameras are in this weird middle spot that is ergonomically uncomfortable for me. They are either too small or too big. The D850 and my D7500 fit my hand fantastically. I will always have a Nikon DSLR because they are so comfortable to hold and use. The OM-5 is smaller to hold than my Z5ii for example, and that gets it out of the uncomfortable middle ground. With the Z5, I’m always between holding it in front with all of my fingers, or just 3 – there isn’t really enough room for all 4, but with 3, it feels a little insecure. With the OM-5, three fingers fit perfectly. There is enough grip on the front and a great thumb rest on the back. The buttons are very well placed on the camera body for operation while shooting. Simply put, this is a very comfortable camera to hold and shoot. For reference, when I am walking around and shooting, I grip the camera the entire time in my right hand, and have a wrist lanyard for safety. This can be fatiguing with a larger DSLR (the D800 in particular had almost no thumb rest and it was agonizing to carry. The D850 is much better, but is just heavy and gets tiring on the wrist after several hours). The D7500 is extremely comfortable in this regard because of its blobmera shape and light weight. The Z series FF cameras are in the middle ground of just “ok”. The OM-5 was very good.

TO BE CONTINUED
204 posts and 58 images omitted
!!xrbfCp4bz9J

!!xrbfCp4bz9J No.4495027 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Is it over for micro four thirds or is it over for the rx100?
13 posts and 1 image omitted

No.4478667 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
poverty porn photographers destroyed in one scene
69 posts and 18 images omitted

/gear/ - containment general

No.4492332 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>camera error edition

Previous: >>4490470
322 posts and 45 images omitted

Zines

No.4438872 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
How does /p/ feel about zines?

They seem fun. You print your stuff, distribute it however you want, and people look at it. They might toss it in the trash but at least you made an impression.

You can make them for pretty cheap. I made some lo-fi DIY-style ones with my visual art at home using just an inkjet printer, and I've been dropping them in random places for people to find.

Anyone ever make zines?
172 posts and 26 images omitted

Flower Pic Thread

No.4489596 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Post em
36 posts and 34 images omitted

Lighting General

No.4494969 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Lighting thread
Let's talk about lighting.

> Broncolor: 3000usd per flash head, the power pack is 15000
> Profoto: basically the same as broncolor
> Aperture: 1/5~ of BC and PF
> Godox: 1/5 ~ 1/10 of the BC and PF


Do high end lighting gears really worth it?
What's the catch on 20k worth Broncolor studio set(excluding modifiers) when 1k Fomex flash set can shoot the same bi-color light?

Back then the chinese slops actually were trash so one might needed to invest a lot of money on it but today it doesn't seem to be the case anymore.
9 posts and 3 images omitted