Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
Threads by latest replies - Page 8
Anonymous
Quoted By:
So, which of the big companies is going to be the first to offer an affordable 100mp camera? Fuji is obviously already out there, but this thing is Eight thousand dollars. I suspect that when it happens (eventually) it will be Nikon. I feel like historically they are the company which has introduced high end features at a lower price.
Anonymous
>>4482701 6x7 is clearly 80mp there
sorry you shot everything at f32 and forgot to lock up the mirror. SLRs suck yeah.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482701 Modern MILC scanning setups can easily outresolve drums by stitching pixel shifted shots.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482116 >DSLRs focus more confidently than half baked mirrorless Quicker, but less reliable and less functional
Anonymous
>>4482703 > 6x7 is clearly 80mp >645 is 100+mp Which one is true?
Yes, this guy in his clinical lab tests using extremely fine grain film stocks managed to get crazy resolution out of 6x7. Do you shoot 6x7? Can you provide me with a scan with 50mp of resolved detail? I doubt you can. I doubt anyone in this thread can, because as I said, those numbers are not attained by 99% of medium format shooters.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482782 6x7 is 80mp on an old ass drum
645 exceeds 100mp with modern scanning equipment
Anonymous
Why has the world abandoned photo shoots of good looking women? 99% of anything I see now is selfies and if its a photoshoot its just to sell clothing or some super generic looking agency testshoot. 10 years ago or whatever the world was full of every good looking girl doing multiple photoshoots just for content. What happened?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4481289 What’s wrong is you quit looking at photography and got lazy and just looked at social media instead. Social media is worse than tabloid trash, it’s DIY tabloid trash. If all you look at is internet shit bc it’s low effort, being on your fuckin phone, then you will make shit inspired by that shit. If you seek to produce work of a higher caliber, then you must seek out sources of inspiration worthy of publishing. Make the god damned effort to get your ass and your things and get the fuck out of here.
But “everyone” I know has told me the future is all internet shit all the time and nothing but internet shit. Only you can choose whether you make that world of shit your entire reality.
Anonymous
>>4481289 Because Fauci and Blden wants women and men to not be attracted to each other anymore unless it’s to politicians or billionaires
And 80% women are so stupid they fell for it
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482436 nothing about schwab or soros or this time?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Buffalo Edition
Please post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.
old thread:
>>4457140 Thread Question: How important is the use of a darkroom to your film photography?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482190 >>4482196 or you can just develop the same, in which case it's called rating, not pushing/pulling
more common with color film which gets color shifts if you change development times
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482196 If he is going -1 it is pulling the film, but you are correct about everything else.
>>4482199 It would be underexposing the film, but then you can compensate for that with extended development time, which is why you get more grain and increased contrast. Most films are just fine with going a stop up or down in exposure with standard dev time although not all. Cheap films like fomapan are already rated about 1 stop higher than they technically should be.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482190 If you want to mess with pushing and pulling film I would recommend trying ilford hp5+. It looks really good shot anywhere from like 12 iso all the way up to 1600 or higher. You just need to develop it correctly.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482196 > and you should shoot the entire roll at this pushed speed. Not to overcomplicate things for the guy that asked, but with black and white technically you can compensate variable iso on the same roll if you use a super dilute stand development, something like one to 100 rodinal or something like that. You get crushed contrast on everything but at least it’s usable. Not that I’d recommend anyone do it intentionally, but if you make that mistake that we all make at some point to change mid roll, then it is recoverable at least.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
PeruAnon here, Feel kinda stuck lately I did some more studio shooting and some nudes (can't share because reasons) but I feel like documentary work is still my way to go However, I feel like I'm on the verge of getting better but can't see where I need to improve in my photography for this to happen Anyone here, who has seen my work over time, with some advice?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Third rate edition
Last
>>4478535
EBAY NIGGERS STOLE MY WIFE
Quoted By:
>>4481956 >What was it? Canon 5D classic auction. Got it for $140 AUD when they go for about double that normally. Dumbass set the auction timeout for 3:30am local time so it was relatively easy to snipe it at the end as I'm a shift worker.
>>4481958 Negative, what
>>4481963 wrote is accurate. Boomers cant fathom the idea that their 20 year old e-waste didnt appreciate in value at the same rate as their shitty fibro house in Western Sydney. There's a follow-on effect where the local shops and gen Z-tards will also list their stuff at about the same rate thinking that's still a good deal, so when you offer or expect a more reasonable amount sellers immediately assume you're trying to rip them off.
Unfortunately since they usually use it twice and shelf it they're normally the items in best condition. I legitimately could find better deals buying from the US if there wasn't $100 in shipping tacked on. My best deals are normally through charities upcycling and at least I know my money is going to a decent cause.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4481598 Yes! Dogs in cars. This is what I love.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4481019 This. The only people seething about others' success are the same people who are easily replaced with AI.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4480864 Tripods are mandatory for quality photography.
Anyone who tells you otherwise is a retard, or is shooting people in direct sunlight at 1/2000 shutter speed where it doesn't matter.
Don't fall for the myth of handheld and image stabilization memes. Nothing beats a tripod.
The difficulty is in using them, but whenever you can manage to use one, tripods are always worth it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Hiya! I’m looking to move beyond my phone camera not necessarily upgrade, but get a dedicated camera for capturing important moments in my life. I don’t want to rely on a tiny phone sensor anymore. Which of these options would you recommend for a beginner? Ideally, the camera and lens should be compact enough to fit into a small sling or banana bag (so I can bring to concerts). Also, I don't to spend as little as possible but don't want to buy used, because the used market in my country is filled to the brim with bad faith actors. a) Fuji XM-5 b) Fuji XT-30 III C) Canon R50V D) Sony Zve10 AFAIK, these are the only "small" modern mirrorless cameras on the market. Your advice would be appreciated.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
How does /p/ feel about zines? They seem fun. You print your stuff, distribute it however you want, and people look at it. They might toss it in the trash but at least you made an impression. You can make them for pretty cheap. I made some lo-fi DIY-style ones with my visual art at home using just an inkjet printer, and I've been dropping them in random places for people to find. Anyone ever make zines?
Anonymous
>>4482374 >And no information for the rest. Then send them RGB. If they're a modern print shop at all worth their salt, they'll know how to best print your RGB on their printer/paper combo.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>4482387 Oh, nice to know, thanks anon.
>The same color can appear slightly different on different media due to the physical composition of the paper. > All files must be sent in CMYK (cyan, magenta, yellow and black), with a Fogra 39 color profile. > Any images that are sent in RGB or PANTONE colors will be automatically converted using a standard separation profile. Maybe I'll look for another printing service.
Anonymous
>>4482402 Ah, is it offset printing? Are you getting a run that's big enough where that's worth it?
Either way, if you can get your hands on that specific profile, you can use it for soft proofing at home, but remember that there's never a guarantee that what you see on your screen will be equivalent to your prints.
If don't need so many copies, inkjet printing might be cheaper.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482505 >If don't need so many copies, inkjet printing might be cheaper. I was thinking about 100 copies.
Anonymous
Looking for pre-2000s landscape photography calenders. Not having much luck. Anyone seen any around?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4481652 >when I go to a national park gift shop and the calendars are digislop with bad white balance instead of large format velvia Made me fucking sad.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
If it's wrong, why is it so good?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4473816 >>4473212 >>4473207 Who are these retards that don’t put a maximum on iso, I shoot P and it’s great every time , when things are fast put it on S, manual mode is for dorks who want to make things harder for themselves for no reason other than ‘I’m a pro now’. P does better than you
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4473212 Retard if you're gonna post Yoshitoshi ABe on /p/ you have to post the drawings with the SMEGMA
>FOVEON WON Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4478172 Eletronic viewfinder.
He's trying to say he's better than you cause he uses a small lens to focus.
Anonymous
For me, it's gotta be Snap Distance Priority Mode. Ricoh Chads rise up!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482474 Real Ricoh chads use af-s with the shutter set to snap on full press, rather than dedicated snap mode, for the best of both worlds
Anonymous
Have any of you working/professional anons had any luck becoming a "high end" photographer/videographer? By which I mean, the kind of person who only works with more discerning, high-paying clients? I run a business that does sound and video recording for classical and jazz musicians (there's some photography in there too) and whilst my skills are pretty good, I've realised that I will never make good money or work make truly great recordings until I get better quality clients. It's not just about money, but rather the willingness and ability of these clients to work under the conditions needed to make a good product, whilst also respecting my work enough to actually cooperate. I've realised half of the issue is just price. Doubling prices has helped get rid of the bad clients however the issue with "high-end" clients is that they are usually rich people who do not live in my shitty area and therefore don't know me. I know full well that a facebook ad will not fix this. I haven't been here in a while so pardon me if this is a faggish question to answer, but last time I was here there was a decent number of current or former professionals.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Is anyone else noticing a big drop in engagement on flickr over the last year or 2? I know its dropped alot since its peak, but it feels like its significantly dropped again over the last year or so.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4479479 >>4481604 This sums it up pretty much.
The only channels still alive are the ones of influencers who get free shit to review and market their lightroom presets. I think humanity is steering to a new trend of less media intake. Truning off phone notifications, no X, no insta. I believe at some point fine art, laid back galleries, craftmanship gonna thrive again. Not in the sense of getting thousands likes but to showcase you as a person to few selected people that care. Not commercialized, not for the money but out of love and passion. In the end for everyone it's much more fullfilling. It's natural and it's human unlike social media like used in the last decade.
Anonymous
We need to cause some kind of an offline revolution desu. Or a campaign against smartphones at the very least. Make the internet a physical location you visit again. Fuck the Thielites and the megacorpos and what theyre doing to humanity. At this rate we'll be some Eloi pet in a generation or two.
Anonymous
>>4482293 IMO*. No idea why is autocorrected to Desu.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4482294 /p/ has a couple of autocorrects like s o y > based
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4481603 >people abusing groups for a certain lens/camera model/topic Yep, like when I wanted to look at the K-3 III group’s photos and got blasted with hundreds of pics from some F1 race day or when I looked at the gallery for some PowerShot and it was, literally, all bus pics from some autist in England somewhere. Please learn to share the gallery space.
Anonymous
I like the aesthetics of tobbaco, zippos and leather
Zach
Quoted By:
i like these too
Anonymous
>>4473779 Might wanna look into whiskey as well, there's a lot of beauty in reflection/refraction of liquids through glass.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4481622 Any drink with real wormwood is better than Jagermeister
Anonymous
>>4473779 No guns and cowboys?
Disappointed
>>4473782 >>4474584 >>4473885 >>4473781 >White trash >gay >underage Can you muricans enlighten me what's wrong with the photo? Because I love this wild cowboy/Appalachia aesthetic.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4481780 It’s usually Asian or Mexican kids here that see everything they don’t like as homo gay even when it’s straight and they’re the actual homo fags