/p/ - Photography

26KiB, 500x422, file.jpg

Cleaning the sensor

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2024 05:52:01 No.4392400 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4392406 >>4392466 >>4392499

What do anons prefer? The swabs or the blower? I keep seeing varying shit on forums about blowers introducing more dust, but manufacturers seem to always recommend the blower and tilting the camera upside down.

It makes more sense to me to avoid physical contact with the sensor and the blower seems safest.

3 posts omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2024 06:04:30 No.4392406 Report

Quoted By:

>>4392400
Try rinsing with salt water.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2024 06:05:39 No.4392408 Report

Quoted By: >>4392411

>>4392405
>the camera has to stay on for the sensor to be locked in place
That depends on the camera, but yeah it's a small annoyance with some of them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2024 06:07:07 No.4392411 Report

Quoted By:

>>4392408
I'm cool with it staying on to lock the IBIS in place, but it still sounds really odd to leave it on while I'm working on it, considering the stories about static electricity and the camera being on attracting dust.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2024 13:49:13 No.4392466 Report

Quoted By:

>>4392400
>It makes more sense to me to avoid physical contact with the sensor
You're not touching the photosites themselves, there are protective glass elements

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2024 16:02:47 No.4392499 Report

Quoted By:

>>4392400
You will need both eventually. Don't be afraid of swabs. It's hard to fuckup.

143KiB, 400x223, story_gr10.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 11 Dec 2024 05:11:58 No.4391231 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4391352 >>4392438

Why does everyone hate P&S cameras?

9 posts and 2 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 11 Dec 2024 19:22:53 No.4391352 Report

Quoted By:

>>4391231
piss and shit?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 11 Dec 2024 19:59:44 No.4391360 Report

Quoted By:

>>4391247
based paracetamol user

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 21:13:47 No.4392261 Report

Quoted By: >>4392384

i just hate the stupid prices they are putting on these things for being "vintage"

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2024 04:16:19 No.4392384 Report

Quoted By:

>>4392261
For the eternal zoomer anything older than 10 years is vintage.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2024 10:02:02 No.4392438 Report

Quoted By:

>>4391231
Lack of flexibility

3MiB, 2540x1361, 547.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 14 Dec 2024 10:14:11 No.4391925 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4392312 >>4392376

Do you honestly care about anyone else's photography, other than your own?

15 posts omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2024 00:23:10 No.4392289 Report

Quoted By:

>>4392001
have any good original photographer accounts to follow on tumblr?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_7237_01.jpg, 3MiB, 2920x4386

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2024 01:57:58 No.4392312 Report

Quoted By:

>>4391925
I care about my photography. I don't expect others to care, I do it because I like to. If other people wanna see what I'm doing, that's cool, but how could I be so self-centred to just expect it? The skill ceiling is so low in photography that most people don't really value it. Even the best, most perfect and interesting photo entertains the average layperson for like 0.3 of a second.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2024 02:15:30 No.4392322 Report

Quoted By: >>4392352

>>4392027
is this engagement bait?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1734084078118183.png, 420KiB, 680x644

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2024 03:14:55 No.4392352 Report

Quoted By:

>>4392322

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2024 04:06:51 No.4392376 Report

Quoted By:

>>4391925
I care about my brother's photography because he's my buddy, but otherwise no.

395KiB, 1440x2059, Sony a7.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Thu 12 Dec 2024 10:29:22 No.4391468 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

Snoysisters, how do you respond without sounding mad?

17 posts and 5 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 00:13:03 No.4392055 Report

Quoted By:

>>4392028
how long have you been on hormones honnie?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 01:57:13 No.4392071 Report

Quoted By:

Sony is the #1 in full frame. Canon is the #2.

Since a nonzero percentage of all mass produced electronics fail early, Sony WILL have more shutter failures than canon by number but the percents seem even seeing as its not bad enough to, you know, stop sony from being #1. Canon WILL have more than nikon. Way more. But not by percent.

Do you retards really think Sony is bad? They took the majority of the corporate customers straight from canon. Do you think Canon is somehow bad? Their existence guarantees nikon will never succeed.

Worry more about small brands having visible issues like panasonics being notoriously unreliable according to everyone but /p/ and pentax DSLRs randomly killing their aperture motors. Or Nikon having five recalls between four full frame bodies and putting their name on tamrons.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 02:06:57 No.4392073 Report

Quoted By:

>>4392028
(She dropped it)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 03:29:39 No.4392083 Report

Quoted By:

>>4392028
woman moment. what the hell are people doing to their cameras?? treat your expensive shiny toy better.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 22:44:56 No.4392276 Report

Quoted By:

>snoy shooters are angry incels
How am i not surprised?

8KiB, 250x238, 1429070085229.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 22:07:59 No.4392268 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4392271

>"creamy bokeh"

853KiB, 1009x1500, L1056189.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

I figured out how to get the portra look on digital

fe2fucker Sat 23 Nov 2024 14:04:29 No.4387548 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4392225

you shoot building corners

34 posts and 8 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 16:24:20 No.4392225 Report

Quoted By:

>>4387548
Overexpose more.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 16:25:21 No.4392226 Report

Quoted By: >>4392240

>>4387552
Looks like it is taken with a $50 digishitter.

fe2fucker

fe2fucker Sun 15 Dec 2024 19:03:48 No.4392240 Report

Quoted By:

>>4392226
i mean it is essentially a digishitter with an overgrown sensor
(early digishitters are meant to mimic film woah stop the presses woah)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 21:08:30 No.4392260 Report

Quoted By: >>4392263

So is this "+1 EV overly aggressive ND" stuff supposed to be le good?

fe2fucker

fe2fucker Sun 15 Dec 2024 21:35:39 No.4392263 Report

Quoted By:

>>4392260
Its subjective.

2MiB, 5616x3744, IMG_7281-2s.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 12:33:33 No.4389147 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

/RPT/ Recent Photo Thread

frog edition

Last: >>4386507

314 posts and 152 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 06:52:52 No.4392118 Report

Quoted By:

>>4392116
>saturation go down
>contrast go up
>crush shadows to taste
tried and true ez mode

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 06:57:17 No.4392120 Report

Quoted By: >>4392121 >>4392130

I am perplexed in what a screenshot of a kindle can achieve on /p/

I think the argument you guys is having is moot. Colour can add and it can subtract from a photograph's overall appeal, both asthetically and emotionally. Depends entirely on what the photo invokes from the viewer and/or what the photographer intended. B&W and colour don't necessarily have a winner and a loser, and I wouldn't go so far to say that just stripping colour from every photo is the way to go.
The real merit in why I posted that screenshot and what I meant in a more eloquent way, was that B&W photography is naturally less stimulating because the viewer doesn't have to focus on the colours. Ergo, if a photo has garish, uninteresting, distracting, or otherwise clashing colours, then going B&W *can* improve the photograph.

But this is a latvian cake decorating forum, so pee pee poo poo, colour photos are no goo.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 07:05:03 No.4392121 Report

Quoted By:

If this>>4392120 isn't obvious you are either a shitty photographer, a big fat dummy, or both!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 07:38:37 No.4392130 Report

Quoted By:

>>4392120
>If a photo has garish, uninteresting, distracting, or otherwise clashing colours, then going B&W *can* improve the photograph.
Agreed, it's still a cheap way of reducing elements in a photo. Photography is the art of subtraction and all that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 19:42:41 No.4392248 Report

Quoted By:

>>4391364
test successful
i like it

373KiB, 1290x978, IMG_1487.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Femanon here

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 13:40:14 No.4392189 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

So my husband stole my camera and decided to go to the Canadian North Pole with an airplane he flies and took a selfie with a stupid animal. What is wrong with him? I need my camera for a project, is he a narcissist?

690KiB, 1353x1088, bliss-600dpi_resized.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Bliss

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 08:20:31 No.4382745 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

There will never, ever be another photo as recognizable and ubiquitous. It was the first and last thing hundreds of millions of people saw every day for a decade. It sits on millions of install CDs, hard drives and is burned into monitors on every continent on earth. Like it or not, it will outlive you. It will outlive your children.

87 posts and 23 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Dec 2024 05:31:55 No.4391728 Report

Quoted By:

>>4390726
I like how people are surprised XP is still running in places, when I've personally seen Win95 propping up some old businesses kisoks or PoS in recent times.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Dec 2024 05:40:40 No.4391732 Report

Quoted By:

>>4391707
ugly overgrown fans ruined the scenic environment how disgusting

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO bliss bird.png, 383KiB, 640x480

Anonymous Fri 13 Dec 2024 05:52:36 No.4391735 Report

Quoted By:

>ruins your iconic photo

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 01:25:40 No.4392065 Report

Quoted By:

>>4388731
whatever the new goyslop OS default wallpapers are
it feels like a hostile environment

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 12:59:22 No.4392185 Report

Quoted By:

>>4383180
This

101KiB, 779x904, IMG-20241201-WA0015.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

a guy with superpowers on a english test

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2024 07:30:02 No.4392129 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4392139

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Threads by latest replies - Page 9

On these archives

Your latest searches

Cleaning the sensor

I figured out how to get the portra look on digital

Femanon here

Bliss

a guy with superpowers on a english test