>>2827655Aaaand I've hooked the first "europe bad, mmmkay" troll...
>I live in a small city.So do I.
>If I drive half an hour (15 on pavement + 15 on gravel), I'll be in a sprawling wildlife area.If I walk 200m westwards, I'm in the woods.
>I'm talking about thousands of acresWell, I'm not gonna convert to retarded units, but we're talking ~1200km2 of just forests. And that's just the continous area. Around a third of Germany is forested, and it's easily possible to hike from the alps to the baltic sea while camping in the woods every night.
However, that's not "nature", it's forests. Same as most american "nature". sure, if you've never seen untouched wilderness, like parts of russia, scandinavia and eastern asia still have, everywhere with trees seems nice. But the difference is stark. American forests are basically wood plantations by now, while in germany and the scandis, due to inheritance divisions, there are thosands of small plots, too small to efficiently use for anything, that haven't been touched for a century or two.
>Germany is a former commie state.Back to /pol/ with you, stormfag.
>Europe has no freedom and no nature.Anybody have a shotgun? I'm starting to feel like parrothunting.
Btw, are you amerifats still having to measure barrel lengths?
