Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 3

No.4484375 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
What makes Japan such an desired place for photography? I'm really trying to understand the hype around it. When I visited of course the size of Tokyo itself opens lots of opportunities but I quickly notice that it gets repetitive rather fast. All muh taxis look the same, the buildings have a pattern that repeats a lot. If you've seen a few shrines/temples.. in the end they all look the same. Even if you visit other prefectures you won't see much of a difference. Whenever I see camera vlogs or flickr uploads in Japan I now tend to skip because it's always the same.

My current number one location would probably be Germany. Still safe enough to bring your camera with you, every state has it's own architectural style. Towns are usually a comfy mix between old medieval houses in the center with grim 60s bauhaus constructions that look really odd. Also home of Leica where this sort of everyday compact photography started.

What do you think? What's your prefered location?
6 posts omitted

The Power of Photography

No.4484632 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Photography has the power to not only document the horrors of the world, but also bear the mark of its maker, for better or worse. It is not simply opening and closing a shutter.

Take this evidence that the SS photographer, Friedrich Franz Bauer, implicated himself with. He usually made propaganda of concentration camps to normalize them against any moral outrage. This was part of the Nazi regime's policy to beautify their camps and "Jewish settlements."

Here, Bauer takes photos of innocent children in a psychiatric hospital. He knew full well they would face forced euthanasia during Aktion T4. But history now sees this photo as a criminal act, a witness to the worst parts of humanity, as well as a bystander who did nothing to stop the rise of modern evil. Again, photography is not merely clicking a button. It has the power to echo throughout history.

No.4469575 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Film photography is better due to low sensitivity in dark areas. No one needs to see what is in dark areas most of the time. Just imagine this photo with unnecessary crap in shadows.
49 posts and 8 images omitted

Did porn look better on film?

No.4474453 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Should industry switch back to film for better skin tones?
10 posts and 2 images omitted

/sqt/ --- Stupid Questions Thread

No.4474666 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Snoybob Edition

Old thread autosaged. Dumb questions go here.
321 posts and 47 images omitted

your moon shots

No.4461077 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
lemme see your shots for the moon!
this is mine btw
captured with canon 2000d 55mm i can not remember my camera settings
i gave it some edit with lightroom this is first time with DSLR
116 posts and 62 images omitted

thx in advance

No.4432765 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Can someone tell me what lightning equipment I would need, to recreate either of those photos?
35 posts and 9 images omitted

/ph/ - Phone Photos

No.4484547 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
It is time.

/cum/- Cars Und Motorsport

No.4453529 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
152 posts and 117 images omitted

No.4482924 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
I shoot black and whit 'art' photos.
I print a lot. So i spend a lot of time looking at the details of each photo. especially if they're hanging on my wall.
that being said, i have a conundrum which, surprisingly, isn't well covered on the internet:

>would you say a leica monochrom, or a medium format (with more bits and more sensor real estate) would produce better black and white images?
248 posts and 18 images omitted