/p/ - Photography

5MiB, 1280x1920, IMG_0759-20.png

Local Book Fair

Anonymous Sat 06 Dec 2025 14:51:41 No.4486697 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

Spent two hours at the local book market today. Reached the place a little while before sunset, pushed through my anxiety and tried my hand at taking some photographs.

Feel free to post any pictures you /p/ros took at any book fair or local market in your area.

50 posts and 13 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 14:46:19 No.4488951 Report

Quoted By:

>>4486706
superb portrait

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 17:29:15 No.4488964 Report

Quoted By:

>>4486706
>sickly skin colors
must be wormji or SNOY

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 18:20:30 No.4488969 Report

Quoted By: >>4488985

>>4486709
It's a beautiful thing to watch someone turn board schizo over your throwaway thoughts. Have fun.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 20:29:21 No.4488985 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488969
>I enjoy ruining the board
Pls go

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 22 Dec 2025 10:34:31 No.4489702 Report

Quoted By:

>>4486706
Great shot anon. I genuinely like all your photos here, your shots have a lot of soul. Keep on doing what you're doing.

2MiB, 4500x3000, 291170522_1768_037.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 21:01:10 No.4488991 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4489267 >>4489675

What makes pic related so uncanny and unpleasant to look at? Is it the lack of shadows? Why would a photographer go for such effect?

17 posts omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 10:58:39 No.4489267 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488991
Most probably homosexuality

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 11:00:49 No.4489268 Report

Quoted By:

If this were /ic/, I'd say body proportions and perspective are all wrong.
The combination of the hips being so much wider than the waist (perspective distortion?) and the lighting dropping off too quickly between cheeks and back (local adjustments?) suggests that the lower body is completely detached from the upper body.
The lighting also makes everything look fake, but I can't explain that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 20:22:49 No.4489588 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489126
it's just deepstate wikipedia trannies trying to solicit donations from that one australian schizo that sends them $5 every time someone makes a snoy post

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 22 Dec 2025 07:09:30 No.4489675 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488991
>anus_peek
kino

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 22 Dec 2025 10:20:46 No.4489700 Report

Quoted By:

imagine taking off her panty and just getting in there and licking her ass

1MiB, 1859x3936, 20251221_150715.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Flower Pic Thread

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 22:02:55 No.4489596 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4489597

Post em

4MiB, 5214x6962, 1759426136734610.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 20 Oct 2025 19:38:32 No.4476309 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

photos of my cat Rupert that i took on my phone which at least trace amounts of thoughtful composition, as per the board rules

I like this shot because it really focuses on his face, which is cute

68 posts and 30 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO N1C_1777.jpg, 1019KiB, 1920x1536

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 06:44:48 No.4488912 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488893
Make a thread with dogs, then.

Here's one of mine from RPT.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 18:24:09 No.4488970 Report

Quoted By:

>>4476319
You caught a nice moment here. I think it would be better if you brought up the crop to a little bit below where his feet would be, behind the blanket, and maybe bring it in just a tiny bit on the right so there's a little more focus on the empty space he is looking towards.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSC01843-3.jpg, 673KiB, 2989x4031

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 08:36:45 No.4489261 Report

Quoted By:

Miss you, Avena.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO folder.jpg, 1MiB, 3000x2000

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 22:49:25 No.4489416 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 22 Dec 2025 04:09:24 No.4489659 Report

Quoted By:

The only good thread on this cursed site. I really wish I could have a cat.

3MiB, 576x1024, Medium Format Mogging.webm

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

/gear/ containment

Anonymous Sun 07 Dec 2025 21:21:32 No.4487054 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

Anything smaller than MF is cope Edition

Previous: >>4485653

285 posts and 38 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 22 Dec 2025 01:36:34 No.4489631 Report

Quoted By: >>4489633 >>4489643

>>4489584
>voluntarily worse
Yes, but you conveniently ignore when they are voluntarily better
You should be equally as critical of other brands for being voluntarily worse too, but you aren't
There is a processing cost to it, and judging from what cameras it's made it's way too, it wouldn't surprise me if it's presently a processing limitation
>Maximum Aperture Lv is necessary for low-light photography and they've only added it to 3(?) of their cameras.
So is lowlight EV focusing, which again, you only seem to place any blame on Nikon
Why is the canon only at -6.5EV? Why don't you call them out for their own limitations too?

>>4489565
Sony had the best AF, but if you have AF issue with a Zf, that is user error, mine has been perfect and I guarantee I've shoot with it more and in darker environments than you have
You should share some examples for us like I asked

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 22 Dec 2025 01:41:24 No.4489633 Report

Quoted By: >>4489649

>>4489631
>A7cII
>-5EV with f1.4
LOL

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 22 Dec 2025 02:11:46 No.4489643 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489631
>You should be equally as critical of other brands for being voluntarily worse too, but you aren't
I don't care about other brands because I'm not invested into them. I'm not talking about anything other than a feature I want my camera, and the camera I wanted to buy to have.
>There is a processing cost to it, and judging from what cameras it's made it's way too, it wouldn't surprise me if it's presently a processing limitation
Z5ii shares the same processor (EXPEED7) as the Z9, Z8, Zf, Z6iii, but doesn't have it. It may get it in the future, but making the purchase now (to get the holiday discount) is a gamble. I don't want this camera without this feature. I struggle enough as it is on my z50, focusing at f/1.8, then doing two full dial slides to get up to f/8 for my shot.
>Why is the canon only at -6.5EV? Why don't you call them out for their own limitations too?
I don't care about what Canon is doing, I don't have any Canon gear. I'm not the guy arguing with you. I'm the Nikon user who wants features that exist in other cameras to exist in my camera.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 22 Dec 2025 03:23:38 No.4489647 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489244
is there any real reason not to get the R5 II other than the increase in price?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 22 Dec 2025 03:28:58 No.4489649 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489633
Manufacturers publish these ratings but i had a zf and the focus just missed constantly in situations where the a7c worked fine.

Pretty sure they all use different AF targets and modes and weird circle of confusion standards. Like how IBIS ratings are as fake as can be (vibrating table lol)

2MiB, 4500x3000, IMG_9109_v1.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

/raw/ - Post Processing & Editing thread

TIM ALLEN STOLE MY PICKLE JAR Tue 16 Dec 2025 06:29:04 No.4488575 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4489646

Well nobody else is gonna so here we go, here's a RAW/EDIT thread.
I've provided some of mine, a few of which I've edited in the past but also a few I've never touched. Links:

>Daylight Landscape with Semi-Challenging Lighting.
https://files.catbox.moe/9lc3dk.CR3
>Backlit Wildlife (bin chicken) Scene. I was never happy with any edits.
https://files.catbox.moe/ctd0mg.CR3
>Interior Low-Light Figurines.
https://files.catbox.moe/l1fmr2.CR3
>Panning Motorsport Scene.
>also pic rel own edit
https://files.catbox.moe/c84va5.CR3

>This thread is less about the merits of a particular photograph, and more about how to edit and change them. CONSTRUCTIVE feedback is great, but aimless shitflnging is for the other threads
>I wholly encourage more of you to post RAWs, as I enjoy giving it a crack myself, as do some other anons otb
>Use catbox.moe to link uploads as there is no way you will upload your RAW with the board's anemic 5MB limit
>If you post a RAW, thank you.
>If you post an EDIT, it's handy to give a quick run down of what you did, how much NR/sharpening etc., and what software you used.
-----

29 posts and 5 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO o9ktx3.jpg, 2MiB, 3629x1967

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 13:59:40 No.4489494 Report

Quoted By: >>4489506 >>4489642

>>4489255
There's no detail at all in most of the black cow (too high iso) so I decided to run with it and go for the fake film look
wtf is this captcha ffs

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 14:43:26 No.4489506 Report

Quoted By: >>4489507 >>4489642

>>4489494
your mistake was to take photos in that light
no amount of editing will fix this idiotic beginner mistake

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 14:46:52 No.4489507 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489506
>Sees a nice looking cow
>won't be back in the countryside for months if not years
>want to take a photo to remember and look back upon trip away from wagie cagie
>swiftly remember that random anonfaggot #378 wouldn't approve if I took the photo right now
>get lawn chair out and wait for le golden hour because omg muh heckin 4chin updoots
>waste entire day for one cow photo

Once again we find an anon not understanding the idea of the thread. Learn to read you ESL

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 22 Dec 2025 02:06:11 No.4489642 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489494
I actually like the crop putting them on the other side. Nice. I need to learn to stop avoiding cropping so much.

>>4489506
That wasn't my edit, but as I said when I posted the RAW, these were among the first photos I took on my camera, and it was done out of a car window while driving fast. I didn't know yet how to properly expose, let alone dial in different settings at a moment's notice. I took over 10,000 photos on that trip and a great many of them are ghastly from a technical perspective, but I caught some really interesting moments, and many of them were accidentally exposed nicely, or are serviceable enough to salvage and show to people who don't care/know any difference.

I would much rather be someone who takes photos in poor light conditions so I can practice and learn, than to be someone who takes no photo at all. :)

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO yinyang_goats.jpg, 5MiB, 5685x3790

Anonymous Mon 22 Dec 2025 02:22:14 No.4489646 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488575
>Goats in their house
>1/8000 sec at f / 1.8, ISO 100
>50 mm (RF50mm F1.8 STM)
https://files.catbox.moe/y42vip.CR3

picrel my attempt at an edit

503KiB, 750x495, sex and takeout.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Sarah Bahbah

Anonymous Thu 11 Dec 2025 08:56:49 No.4487726 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

What's /p/'s opinion on one of the most viewed (online) photographers?
>Sex And Takeout is an ongoing viral series on the unnecessary and unkind social boundaries and cultural taboos forced upon women’s bodies. By indulging in sex and junk food, Bahbah proposes a celebration of the self. Inspired by her personal battle with disordered eating, Sex And Takeout is a declaration of overcoming guilt and shame. Through this series, Bahbah unpacks expectations of femininity and challenges her own standards of beauty.

82 posts and 28 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 05:33:22 No.4488908 Report

Quoted By:

looks like an art school project, bad lighting included

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 20:06:47 No.4489587 Report

Quoted By: >>4489608 >>4489638

>>4488227
>>4488228
>>4488229
tasteless shit from a trumpfag no less. Were you friends with epstein too?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 22:45:17 No.4489608 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489587
>muh trump
The left can't meme

cinefag !CiNE/YT/e6

cinefag !CiNE/YT/e6 Mon 22 Dec 2025 01:55:07 No.4489638 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489587
dup btfo

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 22 Dec 2025 01:59:44 No.4489641 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488133
>[silent moans]
even if you aren't deaf you couldn't hear that
these captions don't make any sense

111KiB, 1000x667, Astrophotography.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Astrophotograpgy

Anonymous Fri 21 Feb 2025 06:46:58 No.4408437 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

New thread

235 posts and 89 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 19:47:49 No.4485111 Report

Quoted By: >>4485114

>>4485108
>>4485109
Yes, Sky-Watcher 300P GoTo. I was going to get the non-computerised one but my dad told me I would regret it and it's worth the extra money and I can still get the fun out of manually finding objects. I have to say I'm glad I went with the GoTo. It's been the same here, I've used it once since I bought it three weeks ago because it's just been shit weather but the radar looks good for tomorrow night so hopefully I get a good night of viewing the outer planets + the Moon. Mine was advertised with 20mm and 12.5mm and that's what I got. Maybe they changed it and forgot to update it. And yes, it's Saturn and Titan (the gold one to the left). I'm going to try and tinker with the mirrors to get them better alligned because I noticed some aberration especially with Jupiter, I want to buy some higher power eyepieces soon. Did you get any use out of the phone holder yet? It seems really chinky and cheap and I don't really fancy messing about with it in the cold trying to take sub-par pictures.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 20:22:24 No.4485114 Report

Quoted By:

>>4485111
Nice, I sort of tried the phone mount but it doesn't seem to fit very snug, you can't secure it very tight or you'll just end up gouging out bits of rubber from your eyepieces plus if your phone has multiple cameras you'll have to keep moving it side to side when you manually focus, not viable when your target is zooming across the view in <10 seconds. I read that the Celestron phone mounts sit much more secure with the giant clamp but that only solves one issue. Don't do what I did and get a cheap laser collimator either, you'll spend more time trying to collimate the collimator than using it on the mirrors, only to find when you put it in your scope in the 2" adapter it came with that it wiggles around anyway, just use the collimation cap that came with the scope.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO soul.jpg, 492KiB, 2560x1691

Anonymous Thu 27 Nov 2025 20:26:45 No.4485115 Report

Quoted By: >>4489632

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO jpg.jpg, 2MiB, 3008x3008

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 16:34:10 No.4489569 Report

Quoted By:

First attempt at using Pixinsight

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 22 Dec 2025 01:38:58 No.4489632 Report

Quoted By:

>>4485115
Very nice.

2MiB, 1920x1280, DSCF8692.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 01:57:35 No.4489438 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4489464 >>4489613

Been years since I posted here, photo dump.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 08:55:29 No.4489464 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489438
>1 photo of a gimmick shot.
Nice dump, loser.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 16:55:01 No.4489573 Report

Quoted By:

>One photo
>Dump
It makes sense, this being /p/ and all

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 21:09:31 No.4489591 Report

Quoted By: >>4489602

this is his wowzer shot btw, like the strongest of the bunch, the first blow eh. a cocksucking snapshit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 22:22:17 No.4489602 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489591
but it’s black and white with grain so it’s art

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 23:13:45 No.4489613 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489438
Cool pic. Nice thread.

703KiB, 1400x894, screenshot.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

I made a dead-simple family photo reviewing app for my wife

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 22:36:12 No.4489605 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4489607 >>4489609

We rate them on the couch together, looking at them on the TV, then I delete the bad ones from our Linux server before sending a big archive to cloud.

We do this process once a year, around new year's.

If anyone is interested, I'll link the github. What other tools would you suggest that have a high WAF "Wife acceptance factor" for this process?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 22:42:10 No.4489607 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489605
Slave morality, imagine taking photos for the approval of others. You're so henpecked it hurts lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 22:49:12 No.4489609 Report

Quoted By: >>4489611

>>4489605
Interesting you make this post just as I began using FastStone as my image viewer. I edit in RawTherapee but it is so bad for quickly viewing photos and culling. It’s way too slow. FastStone, on the other hand, gives me a full-screen view with click to zoom and I can press a button to tag the photos I want to keep then sort out the untagged photos into a trash folder. It’s so much better than RawTherapee.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 22:53:11 No.4489611 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489609
And interesting you say that, because our previous app was faststone. I just wanted a more couch friendly / dumbed down UX.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Threads by latest replies - Page 3

On these archives

Your latest searches

Local Book Fair

Flower Pic Thread

/gear/ containment

/raw/ - Post Processing & Editing thread

Sarah Bahbah

Astrophotograpgy

I made a dead-simple family photo reviewing app for my wife