Film photography is better due to low sensitivity in dark areas. No one needs to see what is in dark areas most of the time. Just imagine this photo with unnecessary crap in shadows.

Reply if you're a real mf'er

contribute
mostly wanted to experiment with the 'natural' setting on the K10D
I think I used -2 saturation, 0 contrast, +1 sharpening but I adjusted it here and there
I also played with color correction in the WB but it wasn't too great

also, /digishit/ general bread

literally unmogged even to this day

I just got an old digicam and the previous owners didn't delete all the photos. I took a peek and some of the pics are actually kino.

lemme see your shots for the moon!
this is mine btw
captured with canon 2000d 55mm i can not remember my camera settings
i gave it some edit with lightroom this is first time with DSLR

photos of my cat Rupert that i took on my phone which at least trace amounts of thoughtful composition, as per the board rules


I like this shot because it really focuses on his face, which is cute

>wanted to do photography
>third worlder
>the camera i want would take 4 years to save up
Fine, I give up. This hobby isn't for me.

Is the Lumix S9 the first camera aside from Fujifilm's amazing X range where you don't even need to edit your digital photos anymore?

What are the best socials or search engines nowadays to discover relatively good photography?

I've found Pinterest (without the adds) to have the best recommendations by far until now.

What the hell happened to Instagram? Something that was born to be focused on photography in the 2010s became some sort of life people's blogs. Not even that, the recommendations are absolutely horrible, worst than things like Youtube. Sadly, it's one of the only ways for some kind of online social presence, and if you opt out of it, you regress to anonymity.

I remember there were some online Russian sites who used to archive good stuff, like gallery.ru