Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Threads by latest replies - Page 5

Send funny, creepy, cursed pics

No.4497485 View ViewReplyOriginalReport

No.4496832 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Frog And Turtle
Photography
18 posts and 16 images omitted

No.4497362 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
>shooting with anything smaller than medium format in 2026
When will sensorlets learn?
3 posts omitted
!8pAWUYKYOo

/rpt/ Recent Photos Thread

!8pAWUYKYOo No.4491869 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Spicy Burt Edition

Previous thread: >>4490096
199 posts and 147 images omitted

/rpt/ - Recent Photo Thread

No.4495770 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
The first month of the year is about to finish. Have you done something notable during this time, anon?

Previously: >>4493179
184 posts and 147 images omitted

No.4496706 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Has anyone tried taking photos of stars from above the mesosphere?
2 posts omitted

/cum/- Cars Und Motorsport

No.4453529 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
192 posts and 146 images omitted

Ladies with cameras

No.4492310 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
68 posts and 34 images omitted

Hippies, cheap prices and negative scanning

No.4496532 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
I found a hippie in the country who would develop and scan my negatives, but here's the thing, I'm very new to analog photography (new to photography in general, actually) and I needed to know if his offer was a load of crap or not.
In this case, he would develop any of my negatives, whether black and white, orthochromatic, c-41 or ecn22, for the price of 5.73 US dollars and would scan them for 2.50 US dollars, that's for each roll, i.e., 36 exposures.
I won't know the real quality of the photos unless I test them, but these prices make me very suspicious of this crazy guy.
I don't know if it's better for me to develop the negatives at home (if that interferes with the quality of the photo or not) or if I should just send everything to him and that's it.
3 posts omitted