/p/ - Photography

Zines

Anonymous Mon 23 Jun 2025 06:01:00 No.4438872 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

How does /p/ feel about zines?

They seem fun. You print your stuff, distribute it however you want, and people look at it. They might toss it in the trash but at least you made an impression.

You can make them for pretty cheap. I made some lo-fi DIY-style ones with my visual art at home using just an inkjet printer, and I've been dropping them in random places for people to find.

Anyone ever make zines?

171 posts and 25 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO PXL_20260119_153015270.jpg, 1MiB, 3072x4080

Anonymous Mon 19 Jan 2026 15:37:48 No.4494459 Report

Quoted By: >>4494460 >>4494461

>>4494458

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Jan 2026 15:41:26 No.4494460 Report

Quoted By: >>4494462 >>4494463

>>4494458
>>4494459
Slick! Lots of white space. That printing looks really crisp for being on regular matte paper. Are you satisfied with how it turned out?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO PXL_20260119_153033666.jpg, 2MiB, 4080x3072

Anonymous Mon 19 Jan 2026 15:41:52 No.4494461 Report

Quoted By:

>>4494459

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO PXL_20260119_153048367.jpg, 2MiB, 4080x3072

Anonymous Mon 19 Jan 2026 15:43:28 No.4494462 Report

Quoted By:

>>4494460
Yes, It's pretty good for the price. Maybe I'd like denser paper for my next project.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Jan 2026 15:44:48 No.4494463 Report

Quoted By:

>>4494460
And thank you!
(Sorry for the faulty orientation, I thought I corrected it).

215KiB, 960x960, filename.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Darktable thread

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 22:30:31 No.4489604 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

5.4 is out, what do we think bros?

145 posts and 10 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 14 Jan 2026 21:17:31 No.4493764 Report

Quoted By:

>>4493698
i own capture one and never cared. it was like $200. AI denoise? tacky and tasteless, just grain vs sharpened inpainted mush. its for birds and weddings yknow. fucking 5dII at ISO 12800 still looks better than 35mm film but maybe LR renders noise worse. ive heard its sharper and more obnoxious instead of soft and creamy like film.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Jan 2026 07:47:49 No.4494131 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489612
>He seeks gainful employment from photography and editing in 2013+13, the year of AI
rofl

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 06:52:04 No.4494236 Report

Quoted By: >>4494312

After playing around with 5.4 today after being on 5.0 for a while, AgX is laid out and works in such a way that the slider controls feel way more intuitive and understandable than s*gmoid's shitshow, and results superior to filmic. I'm able to get to a workable photo much quicker. Neat.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 17:03:39 No.4494312 Report

Quoted By:

>>4493699
>>4493751
>>4494236
Holy shit you're right, this is actually usable.
If the shills could just shift from "the colors aren't shit it's supposed to look like that" to "the colors were shit but we fixed it now" they'd have a lot better success.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO fixt.jpg, 1MiB, 1858x1834

Anonymous Mon 19 Jan 2026 12:23:13 No.4494447 Report

Quoted By:

quick comparison filmic vs AGx, processing is identical except changed filmic to AGx and fiddled the AGx sliders a bit
Kind of subtle side by side but makes a huge difference, the filmic is just generally unpleasant

2MiB, 2997x1987, 000021050010.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Just lost my film virginity

Mirror !8pAWUYKYOo Fri 16 Jan 2026 00:16:23 No.4493929 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By: >>4494086

Rate my snapshits

71 posts and 65 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 16 Jan 2026 23:33:59 No.4494086 Report

Quoted By:

>>4493929
a bit Washed Out.
turn the lighting down and view make slight adjustments until you know what looks closest to the real image

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 19:46:07 No.4494330 Report

Quoted By: >>4494349

Gonna steal some of these photos

Mirror !8pAWUYKYOo

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 000021150034.jpg, 1MiB, 2841x1883

Mirror !8pAWUYKYOo Sun 18 Jan 2026 21:12:07 No.4494349 Report

Quoted By:

>>4494330
Awesome, but let me know what you liked so I know what to shoot more of.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 21:57:10 No.4494359 Report

Quoted By: >>4494431

>>4493988
i keep coming back to this one, composition is unsettling in a good way, like you're looking through the eyes of something in the woods stalking the townsfolk

Mirror !8pAWUYKYOo

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 000021160031.jpg, 4MiB, 3096x2052

Mirror !8pAWUYKYOo Mon 19 Jan 2026 07:34:07 No.4494431 Report

Quoted By:

>>4494359
Thanks anon, appreciate it.

529KiB, 2535x2004, 2kgg80sv4xve1.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 03 Jan 2026 14:56:22 No.4491816 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4494329 >>4494333

Are rangefinders just point-and-shoot snapshitters with slightly more adjustability? I'm entertaining the idea of a smaller film camera but looking at pics taken by them and what they offer they seem like a glorified p&s. Am I missing something here?

21 posts and 4 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 19:46:00 No.4494329 Report

Quoted By:

>>4491816
I recently bought a Canon P because it was really cheap and I already know how to fix them (they're easy to work on). It's such a beautiful camera, both to look at and to work on, but I dunno, I think I just don't like rangefinder cameras. I only got a few shots into a roll and ended up rewinding it and finishing it in another camera. I just find an SLR so much easier to work with.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 20:04:39 No.4494333 Report

Quoted By: >>4494357

>>4491816
Rangefinders are a fucking joke and I laugh hard at boomers who claim it's "real" photography.

Nigga, you can't even SEE THE REAL FRAMING of your shot

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_20260117-172059~2.jpg, 320KiB, 1062x2212

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 21:08:17 No.4494347 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 21:14:59 No.4494350 Report

Quoted By:

I bought a 35SP and the light meter isn't working. I tried to fix it but had no luck. Should I try to get it fixed or should I just go with vibes-based lighting?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 21:50:17 No.4494357 Report

Quoted By:

>>4494333
Who is claiming that only rangefinders are real photography? There are a few benefits of using a rangefinder:
>Shorter flange distance can mean sharper lenses when compared with SLRs, though this also depends on the specific lens.
>Less noise/vibration when taking a shot than some (especially older) SLR's. The vibration from mirror slap can reduce sharpness in photos, especially on older SLRs where dampers for the mirror may not be present or have deteriorated, see Nikon F. This is not an issue rangefinders suffer from. Also a quieter shutter can be useful in some circumstances.
>Being able to see your subject through the viewfinder before they are in frame. Obviously this only applies when using focal lengths narrower than the outer-most frame lines in your finder, so it's not always applicable.
>Generally easier to work on, fewer moving parts than an SLR due to not having the mirror mechanism.
Everything else is either the same or a downside.

101KiB, 500x500, Kodak Charmera.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 23 Sep 2025 23:03:02 No.4470128 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

I am going to buy one as soon as they hit the market in early Novemeber. I hope I get the 1987 edition. It's fire.
Which one are you hoping to score?
You are going to be getting one right /p/?
You aren't gonna be a contrarian try hard no Charmera /p/haggot are you /p/? ISHYDDT

252 posts and 103 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Jan 2026 21:53:15 No.4494182 Report

Quoted By: >>4494299 >>4494300

>>4494158
Interesting, this is good that you can set the date on the camera. I was looking at another keychain camera with the same guts as this one, except mimics the appearance of a Fuji X100. That one had the .txt date file so maybe different firmwares like you said.

How is video on the G6? I saw a video on youtube comparing them, the colors are much nicer than the Charmera's but the G6 sample footage dropped frames every 2 seconds ruining the whole point of video. Does yours drop frames too?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 15:52:55 No.4494299 Report

Quoted By:

>>4494182
I'm no video expert at all but at least in poor indoor light looks pretty jumpy to me to me. Like a lot of frames are doubled.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 16:05:55 No.4494300 Report

Quoted By: >>4494318

>>4494182
I'm no video expert at all but at least in poor indoor light looks pretty jumpy to me. Like a lot of frames are doubled.
The sdhc card I'm using should be fast enough.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 18:40:50 No.4494318 Report

Quoted By:

>>4494300
Damn, that's unfortunate. Probably the chipset is too slow or something wasn't set correctly in firmware.
I have a similar Chinacam that takes 320x240 video and it has the same problem.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 19:19:37 No.4494325 Report

Quoted By:

>>4470155
Fun Fact:
the radioactive fallout From Nevada destroyed the fresh stock long ago. every time they created new stock it found its way into their processing plant.

it was one of the reasons tech lead to digital photography. because of NTS Nevada and 900 tests of nukes that just by chance, the fallout cloud kept making its way to their plant via the jet stream pattern that took it straight there. Dayton Ohio.
Film is Dead for a reason. it also turns orange over time.

34KiB, 673x456, images(220).jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 29 Oct 2025 22:11:53 No.4478830 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By: >>4494321

I'm really lost on how much sensor size matters, because while I read tons of gear stuff here and the most detailed explanations, in reality the photos taken with a small sensor still look good to me because it's about composition, feelings, emotion, subjects and things like that.
So what's the deal with sensor sizes

173 posts and 16 images omitted

Bob Lazarone - UFO Engineer

Bob Lazarone - UFO Engineer Fri 16 Jan 2026 13:16:26 No.4494002 Report

Quoted By:

>>4478850

Any proof?
Take digicam with 1mpix sensor, take photo with DSLR, resize to 1mpix and compare.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Jan 2026 21:12:20 No.4494179 Report

Quoted By:

>>4478844
Unironic techlet.
AI needs good quality input data to work properly. Sensor size affects the quantity and quality of said data (light). How can the AI process an image where half of it is noise and blur?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Jan 2026 22:11:07 No.4494184 Report

Quoted By:

>>/p/4494120
testing

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 19:04:24 No.4494321 Report

Quoted By:

>>4478830
Its the only specification that matters. Everything else only concerns pixel peepers, extreme edits (ie: fixing sony colors), people who expose for lightbulbs and the core of the sun.

Bigger sensor = better tonality and more natural DOF falloff

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 19:06:11 No.4494322 Report

Quoted By:

>>4478850
>all that matters is what bots and browns on social media think
What a sad life you life. Forever servile to people you will never meet.
>you can still take some good photos for instagram
>cant shoot a family portrait indoors without flash
>but you could do a midday building corner and raj and his 100 bot accounts would “like” it!

706KiB, 1728x1296, .jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

/m43/ - Micro Four Thirds General

Anonymous Mon 11 Aug 2025 21:14:47 No.4458547 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

birds edition

310 posts and 65 images omitted

Mirror !8pAWUYKYOo

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P1160120.jpg, 1MiB, 1704x1705

Mirror !8pAWUYKYOo Sun 11 Jan 2026 05:15:46 No.4493328 Report

Quoted By: >>4493361

>>4493108
Looks like a screencap from the terminator.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO maxresdefault (30).jpg, 110KiB, 1280x720

Anonymous Sun 11 Jan 2026 12:26:32 No.4493360 Report

Quoted By:

Damn I bought a new phone and it saddens me than my new phone has better video and even can beat my m43 camera in photo quality in certain areas.
My phone is smaller and I carry it all the time. They say the best camera you have is the one you have with you. Why would I carry additional camera if my phone already beats my m43 camera. Also my smartphone can upload the pics faster not to mention has powerful AI tools which can negate its weakness over m43.

I admit that we have lost /m43/. All this years I'm too stupid to realize it. We have coped hard enough. I'm selling my /m43/ at a lost to some poor schmuck who can fall for om system marketing. Phone + FF camera is the way it is now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Jan 2026 12:31:36 No.4493361 Report

Quoted By:

>>4493328
damn son that looks like it was taken by a $20 digishit. I seriously hope you didn't spend more than $50 on that camera.

>>4492837
>one of them is "going away" which we all hope meant "committing suicide" because his incessant gearfaggotry (over $5000 USD spent, 12+ hrs per day spent between 4chan and taking the same test photo of the same tree over and over) leaked into real life and cost him his home, wife, son, and marriage

KWAB

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Olympus-OM-D-E-M5-III-with-Panas (...).jpg, 56KiB, 500x490

Anonymous Sun 11 Jan 2026 12:36:31 No.4493362 Report

Quoted By: >>4494292

Thoughts on the Lumix 35-100 f/4-5.6 on the EM-5 mk II? Is it bad for the Olympus?

Looking for zoom telephoto lens for travel with my missus.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P1050342 (1) (1) (1).jpg, 58KiB, 1000x750

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 15:36:59 No.4494292 Report

Quoted By:

>>4493362
I only have time with a f/2.8 and an older one at that, but I assume it'd be fine. Minimum focus distance is a kick in the dick sometimes but realistically unless you're in a really tight spot it'd be alright in my experience, even better if yours has one that isnt as far out.

434KiB, 2000x1334, DSCF4045 Kopie.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 10 Jan 2026 18:24:14 No.4493188 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4494221

Here are some shots with people i did.
Posting since i moved those in a folder on my dektop recently..might grab some more..

46 posts and 23 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot 2026-01-14 at 3.09.33 (...).png, 1MiB, 1180x660

Anonymous Wed 14 Jan 2026 11:10:40 No.4493718 Report

Quoted By:

>>4493300
Is that a real job? Maybe have to be a doctor or an engineer or an astronaut if you want to take pictures

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 15 Jan 2026 11:54:31 No.4493851 Report

Quoted By: >>4493894

>>4493652
>clutter
its a plant bro

and of all the things one could with with a plant like that and a person, its one of the more mediocre photos somehow

nice photos, dude.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 15 Jan 2026 16:28:22 No.4493894 Report

Quoted By:

>>4493851
I mean visual clutter. But really happy you chimed in just for this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 04:23:54 No.4494221 Report

Quoted By: >>4494235

>>4493188
>nothing is in focus
Inb4 "that's the point"

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 06:51:45 No.4494235 Report

Quoted By:

>>4494221
Yeah they already jumped me for that saying that

450KiB, 1428x720, Untitled-1.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 16 Jan 2026 04:35:08 No.4493962 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

Both of these images were taken with a Sony Mavica.

10 posts and 3 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Jan 2026 17:20:25 No.4494162 Report

Quoted By:

>>4493966
Scotti made that towel dispenser

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Jan 2026 17:25:15 No.4494163 Report

Quoted By: >>4494167

>>4494045
I wish I could have been in the Woolsworth building that day at the top and had a 4k or 8k Digital Camera with 120 zoom that doesn't exist. Like a Coolpix P1100 or a change out 800mm or higher.
this way you could have seen more details to say whether squibs were truly used or not. but such cameras outside of real film didn't exist.

the other thing is showing up 2 weeks prior where all kinds of funny construction just happened to be going on with floors closed down.

hide a camera and record their conversation. the Art Students from Israel as well

I dont blame Israel but im pretty sure Israeli Secret service and the CIA helped the Sauds pull shit faggot shit off.
You calling me a liar?

PS nice shots for the shit cameras they had back then

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Jan 2026 17:38:13 No.4494167 Report

Quoted By:

>>4494163
I've thought about being there with my camera so many times it's unreasonable. It's the only nearby event worth taking a picture of in my lifetime, and it had to happen while we were in an awkward in-between period for imaging. Some of the only footage from inside the towers was taken on early 0.3mp webcams and abysmal 2001 camera phones. It's priceless but complete shit quality.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 04:17:40 No.4494220 Report

Quoted By: >>4494229

>>4494145
Because its hard to be certain he actually did anything wrong. If he was found guilty, just shoot him. Torture does nothing, and usually leads to them just saying whatever in order to make the pain stop. False confessions, fake info etc.

Basically no one wins and its completely inhumane and regarded.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 05:16:58 No.4494229 Report

Quoted By:

>>4494220
>Basically no one wins
False, lot of the time the guy holding the bucket of water is enjoying it.

3MiB, 1080x2065, horgen_foto.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Instagram thread

Anonymous Mon 12 May 2025 07:58:00 No.4426533 View View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

Insta thread
Will follow anyone

>horgen_foto

Had anyone got tips on how to find less popular content?
The algorithm is just feeding me terrible tiktok reels with millions of views all day long.

223 posts and 42 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 08:25:46 No.4488785 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488603
Zuck will ask you to send him videos of your butthole.
Contact the insta team asap

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Dec 2025 14:30:24 No.4488796 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488784
That's not due to any export setting.
Instagram often just likes to not show the full (Instagram) resolution of images when you view them. Sometimes it "pops in" after a short while, but it has nothing to do with your local connection. It is insta deciding not to give your images bandwidth.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 19:40:29 No.4489129 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488784
I had the same problem. Instagram seems to be optimized for phones (as it was originally designed to be a platform for phone pictures) So if you use high format pictures those appear bigger and in higher resolution on the phone. Anything else will get compressed to shit and only be shown very small naturally.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 24 Dec 2025 20:32:02 No.4490179 Report

Quoted By:

>>4470877
gomoseksualist.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO file.png, 1MiB, 941x836

Anonymous Sun 18 Jan 2026 01:09:49 No.4494205 Report

Quoted By:

https://www.instagram.com/mondatta.photography/

New year, new name. Having random words as my profile wans't working lol.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Threads by latest replies - Page 5

On these archives

Your latest searches

Zines

Darktable thread

Just lost my film virginity

/m43/ - Micro Four Thirds General

Instagram thread