Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Camera Brands Ranked

No.4497140 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Ones you've actually used.
Give reasons.

1. Panasonic - pleasing JPEG, best QOL - lots of features that work well.
2. Fujifilm - decent but I didn't like the JPEG detail rendering.
3. Olympus / OM system - decent, but I don't didn't like the JPEG colors (tans pushed to red).
4. Sony - lots of features on paper but they're half-baked and riddled with needless incompatibilities.
87 posts and 12 images omitted

/rpt/ - Recent Photo Thread

No.4497687 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Here we go again

Previously: >>4495770
60 posts and 50 images omitted

Why hasn't anybody copied the concept?

No.4496215 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Think about it logically.
The A7C series, despite its warts, is:
>responsible for a massive portion of E-mount adoption
>bestselling
>revealing of an enormous market for compact yet usable full frame stills MILCs
Why hasn't anyone else copied the concept?
inb4:
>A7C bodies are e-waste trash
Yes, that's why I want somebody else to try it.
>Sigma, Panasonic, Nikon
They all pussied out hard and catered too much to videofags. The fp could have been perfectly fine if they had traded the heatsink for IBIS and made the EVF solution less massive (ergo, added a hotshoe and copied Leica's Visoflex). Meanwhile, the bf is the fp but even less functional. The S9 caters to vlogfags above all. Without a viewfinder you're more or less fucked if you want to manual focus. Same for the ZR.
For this to work, these faggot product engineers need to get real. A small body, ideally 61MP, with IBIS, reasonably sized grip to not have to skimp on battery life and SD card(s), and a modular tilting EVF. It's really that fucking simple, and Sony has proved that it's not only technically and economically feasible, but also a very good business move. So why haven't they done it?
225 posts and 30 images omitted

Poor man's Xpan (and 16:9) images.

No.4495236 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Since I'm unlikely to ever get any kind of Xpan camera, I thought it might be interesting to post some wide crops from two cheap digicams and a phone (Fuijfilm J20, JX500 and Nokia Lumia 520) taken over the last few years. The JX500 has a scratched lens but nice colours and I think it does OK.

Some of these I've posted before, some I haven't.
19 posts and 14 images omitted

/Gear/ Discussion General

No.4497651 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>Color Science edition

Previously: >>4495130
227 posts and 34 images omitted

/fgt/ - Film General Thread

No.4497863 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Color Calibration Edition

Please post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.

Also talk about darkroom practices, enlargers, photo paper, techniques like dodging/burning, tools, and equipment related to enlarging, developing, and printing.

Thread Question: How much time do you spend post-processing (or printing) a single photo?

Previous thread: >>4494610
45 posts and 37 images omitted

Darktable thread

No.4489604 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
5.4 is out, what do we think bros?
176 posts and 12 images omitted

Beginner Camera

No.4496972 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Recommend a good camera for a beginner, I've tried a few but they all seem to commonly display interscopic flare and framebleed.
2 posts omitted

Chalco

No.4497025 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Sony cybershot 10MP
really than bad?
2 posts omitted

No.4488583 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
New color film!!!
lucky 200 has finally dropped.
Anybody shot it yet? waiting for my order to arrive.
10 posts and 1 image omitted