Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Any /o/tists here? Car photo tips

No.4413303 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Hey gang, got a new to me car recently and i want to take some nice photos of it, but i've never really shot cars. any of you here do it? is a CPL necessary?
what focal lengths are recommended, certain angles or views of the car, etc?
picrel, last photo i could find of trying to "shoot" a car, its ancient i sold my Contour in like 2011. I can't remember ever being happy with a car photo i took.
43 posts and 18 images omitted

/rpt/ - Recent Photo Thread

No.4427935 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Creepshot edition.

No.4418933 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Can you learn to shoot with your non-preferred eyeball?
18 posts and 3 images omitted

White balance vs color grading

No.4417170 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
What is the difference between "wrong white balance" and color grading?

I'm not picking on this guy or trying to make a point about leaving analog colors untouched. But you can clearly see that him fixing the white balance of 800T ruined all the mood. On the other hand you can clearly see that picleft does not look like one of these insanely well colorgraded pics?

So what gives?
49 posts and 7 images omitted

Nikon lens with unique rendering

No.4417267 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
So I recently swapped from Sony to Nikon for the manual focus features and better weather sealing and I was looking for a 35mm AF lens to compliment my Voigtlander glass. I initially was looking at getting the Nikon 35mm F1.8 S but I found the images to be really flat and clinical in a way that was off putting. After reading some forums people were suggesting that the Nikon 35mm F1.4 had a much more interesting rendering and I was surprised to see that in addition to being faster it was also cheaper. The images had a lot more pop to them as well and I think the focus fall off looked nicer. I have not really found charts that useful for determining what lens I will like and usually I think digital's sharpness is a hindrance for many types of photography. I was considering getting the Nikon 105mm f2.5 but was hoping they would make a native Z mount one eventually. Are there any other lenses with unique rendering or other interesting characteristics that /p/ would recommend for Nikon Z adapted or otherwise?
77 posts and 12 images omitted

No.4424166 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>2025
>still shooting RAW
>spend hours post process editing every single photo on a computer
Why?
154 posts and 14 images omitted

uncanny

No.4427070 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
s p o o k y
21 posts and 8 images omitted

Can someone explain the point of photography as a hobby?

No.4427854 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Genuinely, is it an excuse to “be cognizant of the world” or something? It’s got the shell of an “art hobby” but it’s not so different from saying promoting is an art.
10 posts and 3 images omitted

/dst/ digishit

No.4427898 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Z10 cult edition
1 post and 1 image omitted

Hammond

No.4426905 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Hammond, Indiana
49 posts and 19 images omitted